Rahuka
Hi,
I am a candidate from India with 15 years of experience. Currently I am working in global finance team of a British company and intend to work in the UK in a similar role after graduation. I have an offer from Cranfield (no scholarship) . I had an interview with Lancaster
I did not apply to Bayes/ Warwick / Imperial/ Manchester because financially they were out of my reach without a scholarship and since I only got my application essays right in Feb/March (which is pretty late for top schools) and got rejections prior to that
After receiving Cranfield offer, I put my resume in the CV review section of Bayes/ Warwick/ Imperial and Manchester selecting 2023 intake so that I do not face any FOMO after accepting the Cranfield offer
I received a very positive response from Bayes so far for 2023 intake. So my question is should i go ahead with Cranfield this year or apply to Bayes next year. I know i have made few mistakes in my application process but that is the way things stand now
My other details are" GMAT 680, I am a Chartered Accountant from India and did MBA from SP Jain center of management in 2009
Hello
Rahuka,
It is tough to recommend that you give up on the Cranfield offer in light of a positive response from Bayes; truly, despite the response it could go either way considering your years of experience are way higher than the average at any of these schools.
We feel you should go ahead with Cranfield.
All the best!