Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific

Question

Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments. They help prevent the misinterpretations that often arise due to expectations and opinions that scientists already hold, and clearly scientists should be extremely diligent in trying to avoid such misinterpretations.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

A) Scientists' objectivity may be impeded by interpreting experimental evidence on the basis of expectations and opinions that they already hold.

B) It is advisable for scientists to use double-blind techniques in as high a proportion of their experiments as they can.

C) Scientists sometimes neglect to adequately consider the risk of misinterpreting evidence on the basis of prior expectations and opinions.

D) Whenever possible, scientists should refrain from interpreting evidence on the basis of previously formed expectations and convictions.

E) Double-blind experimental techniques are often an effective way of ensuring scientific objectivity.

Source: LSAT

adkikani · Answer

GMATNinja   mikemcgarry

I was able to narrow it down to C,B and D.

(D) Incorrect because of phrase - whenever possible

Similarly is (C) out due to phrase - sometimes ?

Let me know if my understanding is correct.

pra1785 · Answer

This doesn't seem like a legit GMAT question. What is the source of the question?

adkikani · Answer

Hi  pra1785

Yes, this is a Q from LSAT, practice this only after you have good (>70%) accuracy in 
difficult OG Qs and need additional practice on 'super' difficult Qs. You may read 
 this  post for details.
 
Happy studying!
WR,
Arpit

Takdir · Answer

need explanation. i'm really confuse

hotshot02 · Answer

Good question. You will get it right if you go by the basics. It asks for the MAIN conclusion which is the main sentence of the statement i.e. "Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments." All other options except B doesn't point to the main conclusion. Hence option B is thecorrect choice.

GMATNinja · Answer

As stated by  hotshot02 , the first sentence represents the conclusion of the passage: "Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments." But why?

{Double-blind techniques} help prevent the misinterpretations that often arise due to expectations and opinions that scientists already hold. 
 Scientists should be extremely diligent in trying to avoid such misinterpretations. 
 Therefore, if scientists should try to  avoid  such misinterpretations and double-blind techniques help to  prevent  such misinterpretations, "double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments."

In other words, the author starts with the conclusion and then presents the reasoning to support that conclusion.

The author simply claims that double-blind techniques help prevent the misinterpretations that often arise due to expectations and opinions that scientists already hold. The author does not, however, suggest that scientists should  refrain  from interpreting evidence on the basis of previously formed expectations and convictions  whenever possible . Perhaps the author would agree that scientists  should  sometimes do so and simply advocates using double-blind techniques to avoid the misinterpretations that can result from this approach.

Based on the information in the passage, we have no idea whether scientists neglect to adequately consider the risk. Even if they fully consider and understand the risk, there still might be misinterpretations. This choice does not represent the conclusion of the author's argument and should be eliminated.

sananoor · Answer

Hi GMATNinja!
I was able to rule out A, c and D but between B and E i select E..can you help me rule out option E?

GMATNinja · Answer

Again, refer to the first sentence: "Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments."

Does the author simply want you to believe that double-blind techniques are OFTEN an effective way of ensuring scientific objectivity? This would imply that the author believes that such techniques are sometimes NOT effective. The author doesn't just say, "Yea, double-blind techniques are OFTEN a good choice." Instead, the author says, "Double-blind experimental techniques should be used WHENEVER possible!". That is a much stronger opinion than the one suggested in choice (D).

Choice (B) is more in line with the first sentence.

I hope that helps!

chesstitans · Answer

this question type is actually an inference question. The stem is what can be inferred from the passage.
Also, this is a LSAT question, and the question surely is much different from a normal gmat question even though the deduction method is same.
A is out b/c of "impeded" -> nothing is sure about how scientists' objectivity may be impeded
E is incorrect b/c of "effective way"
D is absurd b/c of "refrain"
C has many flaws. First, "we have no idea whether scientists neglect to adequately consider the risk. Even if they fully consider and understand the risk, there still might be misinterpretations. This choice does not represent the conclusion of the author's argument and should be eliminated." Secondly, "sometimes" does not sound good. Lastly, C changes the original meaning.

Manimoneyy · Answer

In conclusion, in general we have something confident or something concluded from the premises.

Here the main conclusion is - scientists has to use double-blinded experiments to prevent any mis-interpretations

So when you get conclusion questions, first step find the conclusion in one line and then remove options - which are likely or should be or it might happen.

Because conclusion here is a suggestion based on some premises so

A - "impeded" -> Check verb impeded. so just rule out
B - Says as per our pre-thinking here. 
C - Sometimes - Not sure 
D - Is one of the closest one, I was about to mark it firstly without applying this method, but refrain and doesn't have the main subject of the passage
E - "effective way" - always look out for something extreme words - won't make the answer mostly

So how do you approach conclusion question?

1. Gather the logic 
2. Look for conclusion 
3. Pre-think both 
4. Eliminate all options which are suggesting something or not sure options 
5. Choose which has both logic and conclusion in it

nurba92 · Answer

Mates, please

I chose E, but now I will try to say why every incorrect answer is so (I am not saying I am right, I am checking whether I am).
I want you to tell me, please, if I am right

A is out because, as of "may", we don't know the chance of occurrence and, moreover, the answer has nothing to do by what the objectivity may be impeded
C is out because it considers only the second sentence
D is out as is C
E is out because effective is not to the extreme extent an indicator of helping to prevent, and "often" is reversed (it is misinterpretations that often arise, not techniques are often an effective way (but can we imply here, that as misinterpretations often arise and the techniques help prevent them, the techniques are often helpful in ensuring scientific objectivity?)

sssanskaar · Answer

I was torn between A and B. After reading the above answers, still I am unable to rule out A completely.

Anshuman0902 · Answer

hi gmatninja !
option B says " as high a proportion" whereas there we cannot conclude from the passage that in which proportion scientist should use it only says should be used
please tell me where im getting wrong

GMATNinja · Answer

The question asks us not to identify an answer choice that we can conclude on the basis of what is given in the passage but to identify an answer choice that accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument. So, remember argument’s conclusion: “double-blind techniques should be used WHENEVER possible in scientific experiments.”

Now, here’s (B): 
 
The passage does not tell us in what proportion of experiments double-blind techniques should be used. Rather, it concludes that these techniques should be used WHENEVER possible. This means that if we have the opportunity to use double-blind techniques, we should use them. In other words, if we are able to use double-blind techniques in 90 out of 100 experiments, then we should use the techniques in all 90 of those experiments. Practically speaking, this translates to using double-blind techniques in as high a proportion of experiments as possible. This is exactly what (B) says, so (B) is correct.

I hope that helps!

vv65 · Answer

First understand the question.
"Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?"

This means we have to find the answer choice that re-states the conclusion in different words.
In other words, the question is "Which of the following is the argument's conclusion?"

Next analyse the given argument.

The conclusion is a recommendation
"Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific experiments."

These are the premises (justification) for the conclusion:
"They help prevent the misinterpretations that often arise due to expectations and opinions that scientists already hold, and clearly scientists should be extremely diligent in trying to avoid such misinterpretations"

Now look at the answer choices

Answer choice A gives us a reason why double-blind techniques should be used.
So A is a premise, not a paraphrase of the Conclusion.

Answer choice B is a paraphrase of the conclusion and just what we need.

Hope this helps

Posted from my mobile device

CEdward · Answer

If I am not mistaken, conclusion questions in GMAT have choices that are not merely restatements of the conclusion in the passage, but choices that represents more of an inference correct?

e.g. What would you logically conclude from the passage?

LSATs seem to ask what was the conclusion that was already stated (and the choice is a slight tweak of the wording).

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Double-blind techniques should be used whenever possible in scientific

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards