Last visit was: 08 Jul 2025, 23:50 It is currently 08 Jul 2025, 23:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Short Passage|   Social Science|                     
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 362
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 279
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,212
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,304
Kudos: 279
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
jabhatta2
Hi VeritasKarishma - while I do agree for question 3 - A/C/D and E are wrong - i also thought B was wrong

Isn't B wrong because the word "people" in option B will also have to reflect males who are the head of the household ?

We do not know what occupation the head of the household (male) is involved in per my understanding.

All we know per the 1840 census is w.r.t to head of the household is
- what is his name is
- whether he is present or absent in the household
- we know the occupation of OTHER household members (we dont know what the head of the household does)

Given we DONT know what the head of the household does (agriculture or enterprise) -- how can we count "PEOPLE" involved in nonfarming occupations as many heads of households could also be involved in nonfarming occupations

Given: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.

The occupation categories included total persons (including head of the household)
But name of only the head of the household was collected.

Hi VeritasKarishma - various categories, including occupational categories. is referring to OTHER household members and NOT to the head of the household per my analyis of the sentence in the image below.

Analogy:
the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by their caste. = In a sentence like this -- the Caste categorization would refer only to OTHER household members and not to the head of the household.

Same logic here

various categories, including occupational categories only refers to OTHER household members.

Thoughts on how to re-concile ?
Attachments

Picture.JPG
Picture.JPG [ 43.87 KiB | Viewed 3835 times ]

User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
VeritasKarishma
jabhatta2
Hi VeritasKarishma - while I do agree for question 3 - A/C/D and E are wrong - i also thought B was wrong

Isn't B wrong because the word "people" in option B will also have to reflect males who are the head of the household ?

We do not know what occupation the head of the household (male) is involved in per my understanding.

All we know per the 1840 census is w.r.t to head of the household is
- what is his name is
- whether he is present or absent in the household
- we know the occupation of OTHER household members (we dont know what the head of the household does)

Given we DONT know what the head of the household does (agriculture or enterprise) -- how can we count "PEOPLE" involved in nonfarming occupations as many heads of households could also be involved in nonfarming occupations

Given: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.

The occupation categories included total persons (including head of the household)
But name of only the head of the household was collected.

Hi VeritasKarishma - various categories, including occupational categories. is referring to OTHER household members and NOT to the head of the household per my analyis of the sentence in the image below.

Analogy:
the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by their caste. = In a sentence like this -- the Caste categorization would refer only to OTHER household members and not to the head of the household.

Same logic here

various categories, including occupational categories only refers to OTHER household members.

Thoughts on how to re-concile ?

That is incorrect comprehension.

"Total number in each category" will include total number. Hence it has to include information about the head too.
The head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories (including occupational categories).

So info on a household could look like this:

Head: Jiminy Cricket
Total members farming: 4
Total members not working: 0
Total members above age 12 yrs: 3


So this means there are 4 people in the family, all of who are farmers (including the head of the household).
This also tells us that there is one child below 12 who is working at the farm.
So other household members are only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories. Their names are not given.

This is what the passage explains.
User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 07 Jun 2025
Posts: 250
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 250
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts, Thanks for always helping me

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal other experts

Please have a look at the below questions-

Que 1)Can someone please help me in understanding below Sentences

"simple enumeration by household mirrored a home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories. Like farms, most enterprises were family-run, so that the census measured economic activity as an attribute of the entire household, rather than of individuals"

My understanding is that - "The listing by household was same as the listing of HBA & HSO. And then it is describing how the listing was done.

What I didn't understood is what was the flaw in this counting census.? Is it that the count was not including each and every member of the family?


Que 2)About Which two groups is it talking about?
"Overlap between the two groups was not calculated until 1890"

Que 3) Don't know why but struggling with this passage and with question number 3.

Que 4) I didn't understood the each and everything of this passage but I knew the gist of the passage.
Because of which I got 4 answers correct.

So understanding each and every details in passage is not so important?
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
1,888
 [4]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 1,888
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794

What I didn't understood is what was the flaw in this counting census.? Is it that the count was not including each and every member of the family?
Vatsal7794 In the very first sentence of the passage, the author sets the scene for us:
occupational information about women that was provided by the United States census became more detailed and precise in response to social changes.
Does that context help you identify the flaw here? the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.

Vatsal7794
Que 2)About Which two groups is it talking about?
"Overlap between the two groups was not calculated until 1890"
the census superintendent reported 1.8 million women employed outside the home in "gainful and reputable occupations." In addition, he arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman "keeping house."
So the overlap is when the woman "keeping house" is also employed outside the home.

Vatsal7794
Que 3) Don't know why but struggling with this passage and with question number 3.
household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.
Process of elimination is generally the way to go with inference questions. You can eliminate ADE based on just the first word: the 1840 census didn't differentiate between men and women. And the correct answer can be inferred thanks to the differentiation among occupational categories (farming is an occupational category).

Vatsal7794
Understanding each and every details in passage is not so important?
Yes, we're better off not understanding any details in our initial read, but rather why those details are there - how they serve the author's purpose. Understanding the author's choice to include some detail does not require us to understand that detail.
Later, once we see what particular detail a question is asking about, we can go study that detail (and ignore all the others).
I demonstrated this in a YouTube Live event which you can view here, and I have another one coming up this Sunday:

User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 07 Jun 2025
Posts: 250
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 250
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks avigutman

For the explanations. Will watch the videos suggested by you.
avatar
Bilderweast
Joined: 01 Sep 2021
Last visit: 06 Dec 2021
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 720 Q42 V48
GMAT 1: 720 Q42 V48
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass
The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) explain and critique the methods used by early statisticians

There is NOTHING that critique the method used for the census. Infact, there is a chronological excursus from X to Y, from a date throughout an evollution to another date. In othe words: a chronological history

(B) compare and contrast a historical situation with a current-day one

No comparison

(C) describe and explain a historical change

Right choice. Look , for instance, at the first phrase of the second paragraph : The 1850 census, partly responding to antislavery and women’s rights movements, initiated the collection of specific information about each individual in a household. Not until 1870 was occupational information analyzed by gender . A clearly indication of a change. Chronologically


(D) discuss historical opposition to an established institution

No opposition

(E) trace the origin of a contemporary controversy

No clues about this controversy

Hope this helps


"In addition, he arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman "keeping house."" sounds like a critique to me...
User avatar
JaxHammer
Joined: 06 Sep 2021
Last visit: 17 May 2023
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 34
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

For Question 5, Although other options dont seem that sound, in option B, I feel like it encompasses too much than what passage says ie., from passage Women statisticians and advocates pressured because they wanted to get accurate data of Women, whereas option B is kinda generalized in saying that
Quote:
They believed that previous census information was inadequate and did not reflect certain economic changes in the United States

here economic changes can be anything, passage gives info related to women but this option could mean anything, although this option is qualified by using word "certain" it still doesnt guarantee that its related to women

So, although our job is not to prove it(as question says "suggests"), should we just go ahead based on others being wrong and option is slightly more better? What do you guys think on this? carcass VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,212
 [1]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JaxHammer
Hi,

For Question 5, Although other options dont seem that sound, in option B, I feel like it encompasses too much than what passage says ie., from passage Women statisticians and advocates pressured because they wanted to get accurate data of Women, whereas option B is kinda generalized in saying that
Quote:
They believed that previous census information was inadequate and did not reflect certain economic changes in the United States

here economic changes can be anything, passage gives info related to women but this option could mean anything, although this option is qualified by using word "certain" it still doesnt guarantee that its related to women

So, although our job is not to prove it(as question says "suggests"), should we just go ahead based on others being wrong and option is slightly more better? What do you guys think on this? carcass VeritasKarishma GMATNinja


It doesn't matter that the option provides the same data in more general terms. As long as it stays true, it is acceptable.

For example, say a passage tells us that the reporter believes that Jack was wronged.
Now a question could ask us this: "What does the passage suggest about the reporter?"
The correct option could be this: The reporter believes that a person was wronged.

If the reporter believes that Jack was wronged, he certainly belies that a person was wronged. Even if we haven't included all the details available, this level of detail is true nevertheless.

In case it were the other way around, then it would not work.
For example, say a passage tells us that the reporter believes that a person was wronged.
Now a question could ask us this: "What does the passage suggest about the reporter?"
An option could be this: The reporter believes that Jack was wronged.
This option would not be correct. It gives more details than the passage. We don't know whether this extra detail is true or not.

Similarly, we know what "certain economic changes" are but that doesn't make using this general term incorrect.
JaxHammer
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,485
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,963
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,485
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 5


JaxHammer
Hi,

For Question 5, Although other options dont seem that sound, in option B, I feel like it encompasses too much than what passage says ie., from passage Women statisticians and advocates pressured because they wanted to get accurate data of Women, whereas option B is kinda generalized in saying that
Quote:
They believed that previous census information was inadequate and did not reflect certain economic changes in the United States

here economic changes can be anything, passage gives info related to women but this option could mean anything, although this option is qualified by using word "certain" it still doesnt guarantee that its related to women

So, although our job is not to prove it(as question says "suggests"), should we just go ahead based on others being wrong and option is slightly more better? What do you guys think on this? carcass VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
The question asks us what the passage suggests about "women's advocates and women statisticians."

In the second paragraph, we learn that "the rapid entry of women into the paid labor force and social issues arising from industrialization" caused these advocates/statisticians to press for better data.

So, the passage suggests that the advocates/statisticians "believed that previous census information was inadequate and did not reflect certain economic changes in the United States," as stated in (B).

There's no requirement for the language in an answer choice to reach a certain degree of specificity. If the passage suggests something, then that's the right answer even if the exact words don't match. And, as you've said, all of the other answer choices are definitely NOT suggested by the passage, so you're left with (B).

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
devil.rocx
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 04 Dec 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 39
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tronghieu1987
Lucky2783
It can be inferred from the passage that the 1840 United States census provided a count of which of the following?

(A) Women who worked exclusively in the home
(B) People engaged in nonfarming occupations
(C) People engaged in social movements
(D) Women engaged in family-run enterprises
(E) Men engaged in agriculture.

How come B , could someone please explain .
i see E as a clear winner .
no ?

I am happy to give my 2 cents on this question. At first I also marked E as the correct answer, but researching more on the 1st paragraph, I found B is the correct answer.



Note that the paragraph says the head of the household (usually male) was specified byname, and other members were indicated by total number of persons counted in occupational categories. Therefore, we could infer 2 points:

- We don't know the total number of men (or women), just the name of the head of household; -> E is incorrect.
- We do know the total number of people in occupational categories (farming, non-farming, etc.) -> B is correct.

Please feel free to correct me!

According to the passage, we know that in 1840 there was no gender wise information available except for the head of the family ( male).
Rest were divided into occupational categories. So, we can safely eliminate A,D and E. Between B and C. C can be eliminated as irrelavant. Thus B is the correct answer.
User avatar
tanvi471
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 21 Jun 2023
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 141
Location: India
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tronghieu1987
Lucky2783
It can be inferred from the passage that the 1840 United States census provided a count of which of the following?

(A) Women who worked exclusively in the home
(B) People engaged in nonfarming occupations
(C) People engaged in social movements
(D) Women engaged in family-run enterprises
(E) Men engaged in agriculture.

How come B , could someone please explain .
i see E as a clear winner .
no ?

I am happy to give my 2 cents on this question. At first I also marked E as the correct answer, but researching more on the 1st paragraph, I found B is the correct answer.

Note that the paragraph says the head of the household (usually male) was specified byname, and other members were indicated by total number of persons counted in occupational categories. Therefore, we could infer 2 points:

- We don't know the total number of men (or women), just the name of the head of household; -> E is incorrect.
- We do know the total number of people in occupational categories (farming, non-farming, etc.) -> B is correct.

Please feel free to correct me!

Hey, but extrapolating names, to know the total number would be a simple Count function. If you know the names, you essentially aslo know the number of people.

Let me know if this understanding is incorrect.
User avatar
Sonia2023
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Nov 2024
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Other
Posts: 61
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My two cents on Question 3:

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the 1840 United States census provided a count of which of the following?

(A) Women who worked exclusively in the home
(B) People engaged in nonfarming occupations
(C) People engaged in social movements
(D) Women engaged in family-run enterprises
(E) Men engaged in agriculture

Relevant excerpt from the passage:

Through 1840, simple enumeration by household mirrored a home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.


For instance, 4 people work under agricultural activities would be mentioned in the census but the individual names or even the gender won't be mentioned.

Further, the following excerpt makes it clear that gender related information started only in 1870s:

Not until 1870 was occupational information analyzed by gender: the census superintendent reported 1.8 million women employed outside the home in "gainful and reputable occupations."

Therefore, E is not the right answer. It is a "shell game" answer.

Men (gender) engaged in agriculture (occupational categories) is not mentioned in the passage.

But B can be inferred as they collection number of people under each occupational category including non-farming.
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 760
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 760
Kudos: 501
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB Q5 why not C

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,439
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,439
Kudos: 952
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15818 posts