vineethk929
Sobby has explained these options. I will repeat in a similar way.
----------------
During the summer of 1998,
the reason for virtually every unusual weather condition, from droughts and heat waves to floods and storms
, was said to be caused by El Nino.
A. said to be caused by - when you have "reason" and "caused by" - it is redundancy. You need only
one "reason"
B. blamed on - "reason" is independent individual part, how can it be blamed on?
C. attributed to - the same as in B - how can be the "reason" attributed to?
D. supposed to be due to - "due to" repeats the "reason" - redundancy
E. said to be - perfectEl Nino is the reason for droughts and so on - sounds good, logical, right.
--------------
2 main parts here are:
1. "the reason"
2. our underlined part
Nightmare, about your question.
-------
There is an error in the question on punctuation. Please correct it.
If there is no error, Please do advice me.
if there were a comma before was: i would definitely agree that
In statement 'The reason for Y was attributed to X '
Is redundant as reason itself says attributing.
However,
The reason for X was said to be Y is a bit more causal than formal
Hi daagh Sir,
May i know whether the sentence:
The reason for X was said to be Y is correct in GMAT ?
---------------
You are right, there is a comma before "was", thank you.
About other nuances I would like to say that maybe it is not a typical GMAT question, but it illustrates very well the question of redundancy. And this is tha most important issue here. But of course would like to hear from experts too.