Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 1207:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Join the conversation to learn more about INSEAD vs LBS
Dec 1310:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.
Dec 1410:00 AM EST
-12:00 PM EST
Think a 100% GMAT Verbal score is out of your reach? Target Test Prep will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Dec 1411:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test.- Dec 15
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. - Dec 16
08:00 AM PST
-11:59 PM PST
GMAT Club 12 Days of Christmas is a 4th Annual GMAT Club Winter Competition based on solving questions. This is the Winter GMAT competition on GMAT Club with an amazing opportunity to win over $40,000 worth of prizes! - Dec 17
09:00 AM PST
-10:00 AM PST
Join Manhattan Prep instructor Whitney Garner for a fun—and thorough—review of logic-based (non-math) problems, with a particular emphasis on Data Sufficiency and Two-Parts. - Dec 18
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
Here is the essential guide to securing scholarships as an MBA student! In this video, we explore the various types of scholarships available, including need-based and merit-based options.
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,185
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
21 Apr 2019, 03:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
83% (02:06) correct
17%
(02:14)
wrong
based on 274
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Each child in a group of children of various ages was put in a room to play with a small teddy bear and a large toy model of a mountain with various geographic features such as a town and a forest. After the children had played with the toys for a while, a researcher would enter the room, place the bear on the model and then ask the child what the bear could see. Most older children would describe the landscape directly in front of the bear; most younger children would describe what was directly in front of the child. Therefore, researchers concluded, younger children lack the ability to see what another being's perspective is.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
a) Children of all ages that are affected by autism also describe what is directly in front of them when asked what the bear sees.
b) Researchers ran another experiment where they took a tall narrow glass and a short wide glass and poured an equal amount of liquid back and forth between them. Older children would say that the amount of liquid stayed the same. Younger children would say that there was more in the tall narrow glass.
c) Younger children often did not understand the question being asked; when they were asked the more simple question "what is in front of the bear?", they would answer the same as the older children.
d) Male and female children that were older would answer the question in generally the same manner.
e) Older children are less likely to play with teddy bears every day than are younger children.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
a) Children of all ages that are affected by autism also describe what is directly in front of them when asked what the bear sees.
b) Researchers ran another experiment where they took a tall narrow glass and a short wide glass and poured an equal amount of liquid back and forth between them. Older children would say that the amount of liquid stayed the same. Younger children would say that there was more in the tall narrow glass.
c) Younger children often did not understand the question being asked; when they were asked the more simple question "what is in front of the bear?", they would answer the same as the older children.
d) Male and female children that were older would answer the question in generally the same manner.
e) Older children are less likely to play with teddy bears every day than are younger children.
21 Apr 2019, 13:51
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think this question is not really GMAT-style and the answer choices are...weird. IMO you'll not see something like that on the actual test.
But that's OK, let's take a look.
Conclusion: Younger children lack the ability to see what another being's perspective is.
The winner is C!
But that's OK, let's take a look.
Conclusion: Younger children lack the ability to see what another being's perspective is.
Quote:
a) Children of all ages that are affected by autism also describe what is directly in front of them when asked what the bear sees.
It doesn't affect the conclusion. The author is concerned with an ability to see from someone else's perspective in two different age groups: young children and older children. Children with autism are a special case and form another group that we're not interested in. It can be true, that autistic kids AND younger children (without autism) lack this ability, and the argument wouldn't be affected. Quote:
b) Researchers ran another experiment where they took a tall narrow glass and a short wide glass and poured an equal amount of liquid back and forth between them. Older children would say that the amount of liquid stayed the same. Younger children would say that there was more in the tall narrow glass.
The "glass experiment" doesn't include "seeing from someone else's perspective" thing and tests different abilities. Hence, we can't use it to weaken author's conclusion.Quote:
c) Younger children often did not understand the question being asked; when they were asked the more simple question "what is in front of the bear?", they would answer the same as the older children.
Choice C suggests that there is another factor that may have caused the differences between younger and older children. If younger children simply didn't understand the question, we can't conclude that they gave the wrong answer because they "lack the ability to see what another being's perspective is". This definitely weakens author's conclusion. Quote:
d) Male and female children that were older would answer the question in generally the same manner.
Unnecessary differentiation in the older group. We are concerned with younger vs older children differences, not with male vs female. Quote:
e) Older children are less likely to play with teddy bears every day than are younger children.
I can't tell how experience in playing with teddy bears would affect one's ability to put oneself in someone else's shoes. Irrelevant. The winner is C!
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
22 Apr 2019, 05:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
Kaplan official answer:
Identify the Question Type:
Since it asks for something to weaken the conclusion, this is a Weaken question.
Untangle the Stimulus:
A study showed that when asked what a stuffed bear would be able to see, older children answered accurately, while younger children answered with what they themselves could see. From this evidence, scientists concluded that young children could not understand another being's perspective.
Predict the Answer:
The central assumption of the argument is that there is not some other explanation for why younger children did not describe the landscape in front of the bear. To weaken this argument, the correct answer should show there is another reason for the younger children's answers and that they can, in fact, recognize another perspective.
Evaluate the Choices:
(C) matches the prediction. If it's true, then the children might be able to see from someone else's perspective – they simply could not understand the question being asked.
(A) is irrelevant to the conclusion; it simply describes another class of children that may not be able to understand another being's perspective, but that doesn't have any effect on the scientists' conclusion.
(B) has nothing to do with the ability to see what someone else's perspective is; it simply shows another issue young children may have with perception.
A distinction between male and female children has no effect on the conclusion, which rests on age, so (D) is incorrect.
(E) does not weaken the conclusion, as the amount of time children play with teddy bears has no bearing on whether they understand the bears' perspective.
TAKEAWAY: When the evidence is a scientific study, think about whether the results might actually support a different conclusion than the one made.
Identify the Question Type:
Since it asks for something to weaken the conclusion, this is a Weaken question.
Untangle the Stimulus:
A study showed that when asked what a stuffed bear would be able to see, older children answered accurately, while younger children answered with what they themselves could see. From this evidence, scientists concluded that young children could not understand another being's perspective.
Predict the Answer:
The central assumption of the argument is that there is not some other explanation for why younger children did not describe the landscape in front of the bear. To weaken this argument, the correct answer should show there is another reason for the younger children's answers and that they can, in fact, recognize another perspective.
Evaluate the Choices:
(C) matches the prediction. If it's true, then the children might be able to see from someone else's perspective – they simply could not understand the question being asked.
(A) is irrelevant to the conclusion; it simply describes another class of children that may not be able to understand another being's perspective, but that doesn't have any effect on the scientists' conclusion.
(B) has nothing to do with the ability to see what someone else's perspective is; it simply shows another issue young children may have with perception.
A distinction between male and female children has no effect on the conclusion, which rests on age, so (D) is incorrect.
(E) does not weaken the conclusion, as the amount of time children play with teddy bears has no bearing on whether they understand the bears' perspective.
TAKEAWAY: When the evidence is a scientific study, think about whether the results might actually support a different conclusion than the one made.
