GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Aug 2018, 08:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 326
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Sep 2017, 05:12
16
12
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

73% (01:49) correct 27% (01:48) wrong based on 988

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

73% (00:37) correct 27% (00:32) wrong based on 988

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

59% (01:12) correct 41% (00:59) wrong based on 956

HideShow timer Statistics

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.


1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated

(B) propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

(C) present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

(D) make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

(E) suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy



2. The passage mentions which of the following as a possible consequence of companies’ realization of greater profits through ecoefficiency?

(A) The companies may be able to sell a greater number of products by lowering prices.

(B) The companies may be better able to attract investment capital in the global market.

(C) The profits may be reinvested to increase economic growth through ecoefficiency.

(D) The profits may be used as investment capital for industries that are not ecoefficient.

(E) The profits may encourage companies to make further innovations in reducing production waste.



3. The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?

(A) Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency.

(B) Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations may allow that company to manufacture a greater number of products that will be used and discarded, thus worsening environmental stress.

(C) A company that fails to realize significant cost savings from such innovations may have little incentive to continue to minimize the environmental impact of its production processes.

(D) A company that comes to depend on such innovations to increase its profits and growth may be vulnerable in the global market to competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.

(E) A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals is unlikely to invest its increased profits in the development of new and innovative ecoefficiency measures.


Originally posted by vksunder on 16 Jul 2008, 07:51.
Last edited by hazelnut on 10 Sep 2017, 05:12, edited 2 times in total.
Question 2 removed since it is unavailable in OG 13th Edition.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2222
Location: New York, NY
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2011, 10:09
4
The answer to Q4 is C and you can get that when you outline the passage on your first read - connecting the dots.

As you read the answer choices, it's important that you make clear what "a particular business strategy" refers to.

Answer choice D states this:
D. make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is
currently practiced

Key Points
1. What is this "particular business strategy"?
2. Is there a case for applying it on a larger scale than currently practiced?


1. After your first read of the passage, you should be able to break down the following:

First sentence is an introduction of what ecoefficiency is: that it's a goal!
Second sentence provides the PERSPECTIVE: provides peter and goran's perspective. What is this perspective? That ADOPTING ecoefficiency innovations WORSEN the environment!
Next 3 points of the passage help support this perspective: that THIS BUSINESS STRATEGY is bad for the environment for 3 reasons.
Lastly, Peter/Goran encourage folks to focus on ALTERNATIVES, not what they are currently doing which is focusing on ecoefficiency innovations.

The question is a "PRIMARY PURPOSE" - type question. We know it MUST connect the dots throughout the passage in order to qualify as being a correct answer.

So.....applying a business strategy on larger scale....?


Hmmm.....actually, no!. The perspective in this passage is that the current business strategy is BAD. They should be focusing on ALTERNATIVES, not making that strategy even bigger than it is!

So if you used sentence structure to help you breakdown and figure out the author's PERSPECTIVE, you should be able to see that D is COMPLETELY WRONG!


When it comes to reading comprehension passages, you really need to use sentence structure to help you figure out what PERSPECTIVE the author is taking.

THis question is actually from the Official Guide and as such, I did a video tutorial explaining my thought process as I read this passage for the first time. It's only available for my members but if you want to browse the other demos, you'll start seeing that piecing together sentence structure is going to be the key to DOMINATING the RC Section of the GMAT Exam.

Video Explanation
http://www.gmatpill.com/special/verbal- ... iency.html
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 22
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2012, 21:49
"Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models."

The last 3 sentences(above) talk about Senge and Carstedt making a point that businesses MUST develop...blah blah.. approach... which offers BUSINESS CASE...

Thats why I chose D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2012, 05:33
I have a question on #7.. Majority is going for answer B. But I am not understanding why that is a viable answer because. The passage suggests that the reduction in costs will not alter the total number of products being manufactured.

The last sentence says that Focusing
exclusively on ecoefficiency,
(50) which offers a compelling
business case according
to established thinking, may
distract companies from
pursuing radically different
(55) products and business
models.

That is the case unless the authors suggestions is adopted, correct. So I am getting the answer as E.

they will stops innovations.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1358
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2012, 16:15
I don't understand why the answer in Q7 cannot be choice A.

The text says:
"Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries".

And that's what choice A says!. Check it out:
"Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that
company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further
improvements in ecoefficiency.
"

IMO, they both say the same. Please, your help. :s
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 342
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2012, 04:26
2
I had exactly the same doubt metallicafan.
The explanation for this question suck in OG.

Quote:
The text says:
"Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries".

And that's what choice A says!. Check it out:
"Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that
company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further
improvements in ecoefficiency."


This is how I convinced myself that B is better than A.

Text : No guarantee of future effeciency. profits --> old style INEFFICIENT companies
Answer choice : Profits --> ECOFFICIENT companies. No guarantee of future effeciency.

I think the difference lies in the companies where the profits are invested.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 164
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2012, 22:58
1
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today's global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.


The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company's adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?

A) Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency. Wrong: author does not tell if they r going to improve further or not ..but he tells they might invest in eco in-efficient industries

B) Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations may allow that company to manufacture a greater number of products that will be used and discarded, thus worsening environmental stress.
Correct : Clearly mentioned in the passage


C) A company that fails to realize significant cost savings from such innovations may have little incentive to continue to minimize the environmental impact of its production processes.
Wrong: we are not discussing about losses the company will bear if not adopting these innvoations

D) A company that comes to depend on such innovations to increase its profits and growth may be vulnerable in the global market to competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.
Wrong: Shell game ...few words make the whole sentence wrong...no where written they will be vulnerable to old style industries


E) A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals is unlikely to invest its increased profits in the development of new and innovative ecoefficiency measures.
Nothing is said about further development, only written they are likely to invest in in-efficient indutsies
_________________

If u can't jump the 700 wall , drill a big hole and cross it .. I can and I WILL DO IT ...need some encouragement and inspirations from U ALL

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1153
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2012, 19:55
very hard question.
no-clue question gives us no relevant place in the passage.

from understanding the passage, find the most likely correct choices and return to the passage to confirm this choice.

I choose A.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 394
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2013, 06:18
1
Complete discussion is given at the below mentioned link
ecoefficiency-measures-to-minimize-environmental-impact-67255.html


Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated
B. propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage
C. present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy
D. make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced
E. suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

Need to know any approach(POE/OCTAVE) to get the answer.

Edit: by carcass

_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2013, 19:01
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

Highlighted text is the key point for this passage.
So in short "Senge says an issue in companies for which he didnt even state solution"

Lets go to POE

The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated
--- Author does not explain any business strategy -- Incorrect
B. propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage
--- He does not provide alternative even. Just stated a proble -- Incorrect
C. present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy
--- Yes he presents a concern caused by simply implemeting Ecoefficiency -- Correct
D. make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced
--- No he does not make any case -- Incorrect
E. suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy
--- No suggestion here -- Incorrect

Tip:
Primary purpose of passage/ Main idea are simple question moreover you just want to understand the gist of passage.
For POE use initial words for each choice such as in this case "explain , purpose an alternative , present a concern, make a case, suggest "
Simply on the fly u can eliminate A,C,E because author does any.
You just really wanna do POE for B and C.
Finally C will be winner :)
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 394
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2013, 08:05
shanmugamgsn wrote:
Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

Highlighted text is the key point for this passage.
So in short "Senge says an issue in companies for which he didnt even state solution"

Lets go to POE

The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated
--- Author does not explain any business strategy -- Incorrect
B. propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage
--- He does not provide alternative even. Just stated a proble -- Incorrect
C. present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy
--- Yes he presents a concern caused by simply implemeting Ecoefficiency -- Correct
D. make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced
--- No he does not make any case -- Incorrect
E. suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy
--- No suggestion here -- Incorrect

Tip:
Primary purpose of passage/ Main idea are simple question moreover you just want to understand the gist of passage.
For POE use initial words for each choice such as in this case "explain , propose an alternative , present a concern, make a case, suggest "
Simply on the fly u can eliminate A,C,E because author does any.
You just really wanna do POE for B and C.
Finally C will be winner :)
Thanks, C is indeed winner. Though, I am slightly confused why did you say we can eliminate C just for having "present a concern". Also, A also seems to have same "business strategy" as it is in C. I think author is trying to present a case against "Ecoefficiency" as "business strategy".
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 09-21-2013
GPA: 3.94
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2013, 23:13
Can anybody please help with Q5..lot of confusion between A and B..:(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Training
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 90
Location: Canada
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2013, 17:24
3
aankittcoolest wrote:
Can anybody please help with Q5..lot of confusion between A and B..:(


Q5:According to the passage, an exclusive pursuit of ecoefficiency may cause companies to

Upon a quick scan of the passage, or recalling from our first reading, we can see that the answer is given in the last sentence of the passage:

"Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers... thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models"

A. neglect the development of alternative business models and products
- this is essentially an exact rephrasing of our desired answer

B. keep the number of products that they manufacture unchanged
- this refers to the NUMBER of products, as opposed to the type
- we are concerned that companies will not pursue different products; we don't care about the number of them
_________________

KUDOS please if my post was useful!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2013, 23:20
manishgeorge wrote:
I have a question on #7.. Majority is going for answer B. But I am not understanding why that is a viable answer because. The passage suggests that the reduction in costs will not alter the total number of products being manufactured.

The last sentence says that Focusing
exclusively on ecoefficiency,
(50) which offers a compelling
business case according
to established thinking, may
distract companies from
pursuing radically different
(55) products and business
models.

That is the case unless the authors suggestions is adopted, correct. So I am getting the answer as E.

they will stops innovations.


Hi,

Even i chose E instead of B for the same reason. In option E, there is no content that goes against what is mentioned in the passage. But option B clearly mentions "manufacture greater number of products" which goes against the line " do not alter the number of products manufactured" in the passage. Can someone clarify?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2013, 21:24
I am confused with Q 4. Why not the answer is option B. Senge and Carstedt propose an alternative.

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 286
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.6
WE: Brand Management (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2013, 02:13
I got everything write but i took more than 9 minutes tor 3 questions, anyone interested in discussing the timing strategies, i read the whole passage and understood, made notes, so i didnt go back to the passage for any question, but i believe there is too much reading in these questions as well as the passage. Big sentences in question 7, any advice on how to tackle this passage for timing?

Image Posted from GMAT ToolKit
_________________

Cheers
Farhan

My Blog - Student for Life ( Oxford MBA)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2013
Posts: 26
Schools: Mannheim"17
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2013, 22:59
rajechP wrote:
I am confused with Q 4. Why not the answer is option B. Senge and Carstedt propose an alternative.

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.


Hi,

The question 4 asks "what is the primary purpose"?
if you notice carefully there are 2 questions which are based on the Main Line of the passage.
and that line is" but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future."

The passage further explains this line in detail.
It explains the concerns of the particular "ecoefficiency" strategy.

Thus the passage does not primarily suggest any alternative strategy.


Thanks,
Aniket
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 147
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2013, 21:58
Why isnt (B) the answer of question 5..Can someone explain?
_________________

Preparing for another shot...

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 806
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2013, 22:15
akankshasoneja wrote:
Why isnt (B) the answer of question 5..Can someone explain?


hi,

Q5:According to the passage, an exclusive pursuit of ecoefficiency may cause companies to
A. neglect the development of alternative business models and products
B. keep the number of products that they manufacture unchanged
C. invest capital from increased profits primarily in inefficient and outmoded industries that may prove unprofitable
D. overemphasize the production process as the key to increasing profits and growth
E. focus more on reducing costs than on reducing the environmental impact of production processes

see passage last line:
Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

clearly this is what A says.

B is nowhere written.

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

NUS Thread Master
User avatar
Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 93
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2015, 02:42
farhanc85 wrote:
I got everything write but i took more than 9 minutes tor 3 questions, anyone interested in discussing the timing strategies, i read the whole passage and understood, made notes, so i didnt go back to the passage for any question, but i believe there is too much reading in these questions as well as the passage. Big sentences in question 7, any advice on how to tackle this passage for timing?

Image Posted from GMAT ToolKit


Well you need to shorten your notes because if you are making too detailed notes you are wasting precious time.
Your notes should give you an idea where the answer is , so that you can always go back for 5 seconds and answer the question
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Re: Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact &nbs [#permalink] 05 Feb 2015, 02:42

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 39 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.