GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 23 May 2018, 00:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1379
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2017, 20:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (01:44) correct 53% (01:56) wrong based on 438 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT

_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 21 May 2013
Posts: 629
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 00:08
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 00:49
Imo B as well . Campaign promise is never to provide more assistance

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Posts: 34
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 02:13
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument

I do agree with the reasoning my choice A.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 30
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 02:40
A is correct choice bcz voters vote for those who promise to provide govtt assistance.So they will be the ones who would win and keep their promise

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 432
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2017, 23:43
(C) may sound somehow tangential but it is wrong because argument is saying tax is a form of intrusion, so whether people do have financial problem or not, tax will be an intrusion.

Lets say tax is only 1% , still an intrusion
tax is 30% , still an intrusion.

B is actually strengthening the argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Aug 2017
Posts: 10
Location: India
Schools: WP Carey" 20
GMAT 1: 540 Q44 V33
GPA: 3.75
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 07:05
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument




Hi, can you please explain how you got option A as answer?
_________________

If you want to shine like a Sun, first burn like a Sun:.... APJ Abdul Kalam

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 21 May 2013
Posts: 629
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 07:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
NEENA SHEREEN wrote:
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument



Hi, can you please explain how you got option A as answer?



I have highlighted my explanation in option A for your reference.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 274
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2017, 15:05
1
This post received
KUDOS
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


Voters will elect politicians who will provide government assistance to solve pressing problems; government assistance will come at a cost generated from taxes; tax is one kind of intrusion which according to the editor will not substantially be reduced as politicians when elected keep their promise, providing government assistance

A wins
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Apr 2017
Posts: 42
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2017, 03:55
(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises... Defines the causal relationship required to strengthen author claim
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 93
Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3.68
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2017, 00:37
To solve this question, we should focus on the second sentence.
"But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems."

Then everything is clear.

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises
Politicians who win their elections -> Politicians who promise that goverment will provide assisstance -> Keep their promises -> intrusions reraley reduce.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 51
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2018, 08:44
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises. If politicians keep their campaign promise - that the government will provide assistance to solve people's most pressing problems - then it would be a case of government assistance. Since Government assistance = Government intrusion, this strengthens the argument

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office. If the promise is to provide assistance to solve the most pressing problems but once elected politicians never deliver on their promise, then this actually weakens the argument

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems. This has no impact on the argument

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies. I would consider this to be out of scope as the comparison between democratic & non-democratic countries was never in question

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected. This weakens the argument. If those who deliver on their promise are rarely elected, then governmental intrusion should definitely reduce.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1002
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2018, 09:12
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises. --Correct. If they keep their promises then they will solve problems and taxes will never be reduced and thus, government intrusion will never be reduced.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office. --Weakener. If they never do what they promise then they won't solve public's problems and they will not increase taxes and government's intrusion will not increase.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems. --Out of scope

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies. --Wrong comparison (unrelated to the argument)

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected. --This option is similar to option B. Weakener.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce   [#permalink] 16 Mar 2018, 09:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.