GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Nov 2018, 10:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • All GMAT Club Tests are Free and open on November 22nd in celebration of Thanksgiving Day!

     November 22, 2018

     November 22, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open November 22nd to celebrate Thanksgiving Day! Access will be available from 0:01 AM to 11:59 PM, Pacific Time (USA)
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     November 24, 2018

     November 24, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1378
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2017, 19:37
3
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:40) correct 54% (01:58) wrong based on 660 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT

_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 21 May 2013
Posts: 653
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2017, 23:08
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2017, 23:49
Imo B as well . Campaign promise is never to provide more assistance

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Posts: 34
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 01:13
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument

I do agree with the reasoning my choice A.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 33
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 01:40
A is correct choice bcz voters vote for those who promise to provide govtt assistance.So they will be the ones who would win and keep their promise

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 371
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2017, 22:43
(C) may sound somehow tangential but it is wrong because argument is saying tax is a form of intrusion, so whether people do have financial problem or not, tax will be an intrusion.

Lets say tax is only 1% , still an intrusion
tax is 30% , still an intrusion.

B is actually strengthening the argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Location: India
Schools: WP Carey" 20
GMAT 1: 540 Q44 V33
GPA: 3.75
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 06:05
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument




Hi, can you please explain how you got option A as answer?
_________________

If you want to shine like a Sun, first burn like a Sun:.... APJ Abdul Kalam

Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 21 May 2013
Posts: 653
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 06:26
1
NEENA SHEREEN wrote:
KS15 wrote:
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises:If this happens>then Govt will provide assistance>more taxes>more intrusion

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


A strengthens the argument



Hi, can you please explain how you got option A as answer?



I have highlighted my explanation in option A for your reference.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 267
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2017, 14:05
1
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


Voters will elect politicians who will provide government assistance to solve pressing problems; government assistance will come at a cost generated from taxes; tax is one kind of intrusion which according to the editor will not substantially be reduced as politicians when elected keep their promise, providing government assistance

A wins
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Apr 2017
Posts: 40
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2017, 02:55
(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises... Defines the causal relationship required to strengthen author claim
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 87
Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3.68
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2017, 23:37
To solve this question, we should focus on the second sentence.
"But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems."

Then everything is clear.

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises
Politicians who win their elections -> Politicians who promise that goverment will provide assisstance -> Keep their promises -> intrusions reraley reduce.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 79
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2018, 07:44
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT


(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises. If politicians keep their campaign promise - that the government will provide assistance to solve people's most pressing problems - then it would be a case of government assistance. Since Government assistance = Government intrusion, this strengthens the argument

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office. If the promise is to provide assistance to solve the most pressing problems but once elected politicians never deliver on their promise, then this actually weakens the argument

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems. This has no impact on the argument

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies. I would consider this to be out of scope as the comparison between democratic & non-democratic countries was never in question

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected. This weakens the argument. If those who deliver on their promise are rarely elected, then governmental intrusion should definitely reduce.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1226
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2018, 08:12
1
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises. --Correct. If they keep their promises then they will solve problems and taxes will never be reduced and thus, government intrusion will never be reduced.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office. --Weakener. If they never do what they promise then they won't solve public's problems and they will not increase taxes and government's intrusion will not increase.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems. --Out of scope

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies. --Wrong comparison (unrelated to the argument)

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected. --This option is similar to option B. Weakener.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!
Preparing for RC my way
RC Summary Activity - New Project to imporve RC Skills
Bloomberg's US Bschool Ranking

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant | 2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation | 3. LSAT RC compilation | 4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal | 5. QOTD RC (Carcass) | 6. Challange OG RC | 7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Posts: 39
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2018, 08:50
GMATNinja can you please explain why A? Here one promise is not to intrude the voters life too. what if politicians keep this promise instead?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 248
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2018, 10:11
aditya201819 wrote:
GMATNinja can you please explain why A? Here one promise is not to intrude the voters life too. what if politicians keep this promise instead?

Take a look at this:
Quote:
Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems


The text marked bold shows that candidates who promise to reduce governmental intrusion usually don't get elected. Hence, if politicians who promise this don't get elected they can't keep that promise.


So if candidates who fight for more intrusion because they want to assists voters get elected and these candidates keep their promises then it appears likely that the governmental intrusion won't be reduced.


Hope that helps :-)
_________________

My goal: 700 GMAT score - REACHED :-) | My debrief - first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)

If I could help you with my answer, consider giving me Kudos

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 463
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2018, 03:43
broall wrote:
Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce governmental intrusion into voters’ lives. But voters actually elect politicians who instead promise that the government will provide assistance to solve their most pressing problems.
Governmental assistance, however, costs money, and money can come only from taxes, which can be considered a form of governmental intrusion. Thus, governmental intrusion into the lives of voters will rarely be substantially reduced over
time in a democracy.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the editor’s argument?

(A) Politicians who win their elections usually keep their campaign promises.

(B) Politicians never promise what they really intend to do once in office.

(C) The most common problems people have are financial problems.

(D) Governmental intrusion into the lives of voters is no more burdensome in nondemocratic countries than it is in democracies.

(E) Politicians who promise to do what they actually believe ought to be done are rarely elected.

Source: LSAT



This is a great example of cycle logic . Tis logic is often tested in GMAT.

X leads to Y
Y leads to Z
Z leads to A
therefore X leads to A.


now the cycle will only complete if all the links follow. All you have to do is find one link which can be broken and hence the following logic wont follow.

the argument :
X: politicians concerned abt public's issue
Y : need money
Z: taxes
A: govt. intrusion

you can join all the links and check if one of the links can be broken !!
for eg : X - what if public no more cares about issues?? logic falls OR whtat if politicians supporting issuesdont get elected or dont keep their words
Z: what if we get money from somewhere else??


Keep this in mind ...there are GMAT Q's in which the conclusion mentions " vicious cycle"
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce &nbs [#permalink] 05 Nov 2018, 03:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editor: Many candidates say that if elected they will reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.