Bunuel
Essayist: Every contract negotiator has been lied to by someone or other, and whoever lies to anyone is practicing deception. But, of course, anyone who has been lied to has also lied to someone or other.
If the essayist’s statements are true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) Every contract negotiator has practiced deception.
(B) Not everyone who practices deception is lying to someone.
(C) Not everyone who lies to someone is practicing deception.
(D) Whoever lies to a contract negotiator has been lied to by a contract negotiator.
(E) Whoever lies to anyone is lied to by someone.
This is a question which can be done even with Venn diagram testing Set and sub-set concept. Or we can also use IF -THEN concept.
There are 3 sets..
Set A- Those who have been lied to....Mr D is a part of it.
Set B - Practicing deception
Set C - Those who have lied to someone...
Every contract negotiator(D) has been
lied to by someone or other(A), and whoever lies to anyone(C) is practicing deception.(B).........If C, then B
But, of course, anyone who has been lied to (A) has also lied to someone or other. (C).........If A, then C
Or we can say A>>> C>>>B
Let us see the choices...
(A) Every contract negotiator has practiced deception.
We know D is part of A, so he is also C. And we know C is also B.So, D is B, that is Every contract negotiator(D) has practiced deception(B)...TRUE
(B) Not everyone who practices deception(B) is lying to someone(C).
We can say that C>>>B, but we cannot say
If B then C or All B not equal to C..It may be that B and C are overlapping sets.
(C) Not everyone who lies to someone(C) is practicing deception(B).
This is clearly not true. We know that - If C, then B.
(D) Whoever lies to a contract negotiator has been lied to by a contract negotiator.
D is not a part of both A and B. Out of context
(E) Whoever lies to anyone(C) is lied to by someone(A).
Very likely to be picked up as the answer.
But If A, then C does not mean If C, then A.We can just say that If NOT C, then NOT A.
A.