It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 05:21

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

European Convention on Human Rights

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 May 2013
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 49 [4], given: 13

European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2013, 00:53
4
This post received
KUDOS
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (00:50) correct 57% (00:58) wrong based on 404 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.

A. no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts
B. British courts did not acknowledge a law of privacy
C. the courts in Britain had not acknowledged a law of privacy
D. a law of privacy was not acknowledged by the courts in Britain
E. there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 49 [4], given: 13

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1120

Kudos [?]: 2405 [1], given: 219

Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2013, 01:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.

We know that an unstated rule of the GMAT is "avoid passive"(if possible).
A, D use a passive form.
The past perfect is used to clarify a sequence of events, the latter should be expressed in PP form and the most recent is simple past.

In this sentence the "timing" is already clear, since the sentence begins with "until"; we already know what happened first, so the use of the Past Perfect is not necessary, hence we should go for the most concise answer. All this leaves us with B, that is the best option

B. British courts did not acknowledge a law of privacy
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Kudos [?]: 2405 [1], given: 219

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 84

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 15

Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2013, 04:29
Hi zarralou i believe that option a is wrong because it is a sentence fragment
_________________

Kudos always encourages me

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 15

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1120

Kudos [?]: 2405 [0], given: 219

Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2013, 04:44
swati007 wrote:
Hi zarralou i believe that option a is wrong because it is a sentence fragment


A clause is called a fragment if is a dependent clause without subject / verb, or is not connected to an IC (or a combination of those).

"A. no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts " this clearly has both a subject and a verb, so you're saying that is dependent clause... yes, I can agree with that, mostly because the sentence states "... yet ..." (when?) so its meaning is not complete on its own (hence is a DC).
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Kudos [?]: 2405 [0], given: 219

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2013
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 42

GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
Reviews Badge
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2013, 08:06
Between B and D, B is better because first clause is in active so it make sense to go with active in 2nd clause...

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 42

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2013, 00:32
Hi All,

What is wrong in (E)? The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?



Regards

Argha

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 832

Kudos [?]: 1645 [0], given: 197

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2013, 03:01
argha wrote:
Hi All,

What is wrong in (E)? The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?



Regards

Argha


hi argha,

option E is wrong because itcompletely changes the intended meaningof the original question.

Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.
intended meaning:==until 2000,british courts dindnt pass any law of privacy

opton E:
E. there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain===>UNTIL 2000 THERE WAS NO LAW IN BRITAIN ON PRIVACY.
USE OF HAD IS ALSO WRONG HERE.YOU CAN EXPRESS WITH SIMPLE PAST ALSO
...

I didnt understand what you meant to say with this:

The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?


hope it helps.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Kudos [?]: 1645 [0], given: 197

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1

GMAT Date: 03-16-2013
GPA: 3
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2013, 21:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
hi dears
in (B)....>british court=may be consume as a type of court
in (c)......>the court in britain is clear than another

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 1

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2013, 22:32
Hi Shailesh,

If option (E) is plugged into the original question:

Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain

Between the two highlighted verbs above, the second one precedes the first. Hence the tense of the second should be PP.

But I presume, when the sequence of events is clear by the usage of "until", then both the verbs should be simple past.

My bad, as I was not aware of this.

Thanks for the explanation anyways.



Regards

Argha

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10200

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2015, 02:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1387

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 916

Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2015, 05:44
main error with a is
as yet, redundant

the correct answer must
logic
not ambiguous'
not redundant

all 3 aspects is in meaning point.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 916

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2698

Kudos [?]: 450 [0], given: 207

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2016, 15:54
agree...b seems the best...C is a nice trap though...

Kudos [?]: 450 [0], given: 207

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Oct 2016
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2017, 12:00
Hi,

Since you are using two simple past tenses because of the presence of "Until", shouldn't we use two simple past tenses when "before/after is used" as before/ater also clarifies what happened first?

For Example : I had eaten before I went to office

Shouldn't it be "I ate before I went to office" as "before" suggests the sequence of events?

Please let me know.

Regards,
Rohit

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 542

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 98

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2017, 08:54
koolgmat wrote:
Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.

A. no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts
B. British courts did not acknowledge a law of privacy
C. the courts in Britain had not acknowledged a law of privacy
D. a law of privacy was not acknowledged by the courts in Britain
E. there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain


very close between B and C...

yes past perfect is optional.. but eventhough PP is there,,nothing rong..

to me,,"the courts in britain" sounds better than british courts...

any expert opinion please,,,

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 98

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 14

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: European Convention on Human Rights [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 02:31
Why is option D incorrect?? Since the Sentence talks about the past action , using the verb DID which is in present context is incorrect . Am I right??

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 14

Re: European Convention on Human Rights   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2017, 02:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

European Convention on Human Rights

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.