Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1806:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join Piyush Beriwala in this webinar as he guides you through a smart study plan to achieve the 99th %ile on the GMAT Focus. Learn the best strategies and tips to master the test and boost your score.
May 1706:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
We know Strengthen and Weaken questions account for more than 50% of the CR questions on the GMAT. With CR becoming even more important on GMAT Focus, it's time you strengthen your weaknesses with an approach that improves your solving time and accuracy!
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-05:30 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight fair, the biggest MBA fair of the year. You will have a chance to hear Admissions directors from almost every Top 20 program speak, network with peers, and conveniently attend morning or afternoon sessions.
11 Jul 2013, 02:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
76% (01:42) correct
24%
(01:55)
wrong
based on 7754
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are strikingly similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year. Based on these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film. The accusation is clearly without merit. All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?
(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.
ID - CR05077
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?
(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.
ID - CR05077
I did pick B but with hesitation can someone provide a detailed analysis on this question. Thanks!
20 Jul 2018, 13:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
NOTE: This prompt appears in the OG 2019; however, note that option E is different!
Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year. Pointing to these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film. The accusation is clearly without merit. All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director’s position?
A. Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
B. The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
C. The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
D. The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
E. Production work on Thieves began before production work on The Big Heist was started.
BID (Boil It Down): Big Heist Before Thieves -> Big Heist didn’t copy Thieves
Conclusion: The director did not copy characters and plot from Thieves when making The Big Heist.
Proof: Production work on The Big Heist was completed before the release of Thieves.
Big 3 GMAT Assumptions:
The Goal: We are asked for support of the position/conclusion that the director did not copy from Thieves. We need to reinforce the notion that the time frame of the finished production of The Big Heist is relevant to issue of stealing from Thieves.
Choice B is correct. If the characters and plot used in The Big Heist that most resemble those of Thieves have been used in many films, this suggests strongly that the director is correct: There was no copying from Thieves. The ideas are common to the genre. This helps to point to an exonerating factor, although it is no slam dunk reinforcement of his assumption. B doesn’t prove the director is right, but it does lend support, which is what the question is asking for.
Choice A is a smoking gun, 180. It actually opens an avenue to make the director’s assumption that the time frame exonerates him totally irrelevant. In other words, this option could be used to say that the director DID have access to the script of Thieves before making The Big Heist, thus supporting the idea that copying did take place.
Choice C is an irrelevant comparison: The relation of Thieves to other films made by the studio does diddly to support the director’s claim, or even the studio’s argument for that matter. This is a complete left-field option.
Choice D does not have any kind of known impact on the argument by itself. For this option to be relevant, we’d have to lend the option the unwarranted assumption that the directors shared ideas, and even then, it would WEAKEN the director’s claim rather than support it.
Choice E would require us to make the unwarranted assumption that the director learned something about Thieves before making The Big Heist.
The Bigger Picture
There's an important lesson in this question: the assignment we're actually asked to complete.
Option B is not a slam dunk case for the director, but we're not actually asked to find a slam dunk case. What is this question asking us to do?
"Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director’s position?"
In that light, although B provides some support for the director, the other 4 options provide none, so B is 100% the answer to the assigned task even the it merely provides a shade of support.
Remember this lesson! The GMAT lavishly rewards those who actually follow instructions.
Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year. Pointing to these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film. The accusation is clearly without merit. All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director’s position?
A. Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
B. The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
C. The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
D. The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
E. Production work on Thieves began before production work on The Big Heist was started.
BID (Boil It Down): Big Heist Before Thieves -> Big Heist didn’t copy Thieves
Conclusion: The director did not copy characters and plot from Thieves when making The Big Heist.
Proof: Production work on The Big Heist was completed before the release of Thieves.
Big 3 GMAT Assumptions:
- 1. Success - N/A
2. Relevance - Relevance of time frame: time frame of finished production relevant to issue of stealing (what if the director had a copy of the Thieves script before production)
3. No Other Factors - N/A
The Goal: We are asked for support of the position/conclusion that the director did not copy from Thieves. We need to reinforce the notion that the time frame of the finished production of The Big Heist is relevant to issue of stealing from Thieves.
Choice B is correct. If the characters and plot used in The Big Heist that most resemble those of Thieves have been used in many films, this suggests strongly that the director is correct: There was no copying from Thieves. The ideas are common to the genre. This helps to point to an exonerating factor, although it is no slam dunk reinforcement of his assumption. B doesn’t prove the director is right, but it does lend support, which is what the question is asking for.
Choice A is a smoking gun, 180. It actually opens an avenue to make the director’s assumption that the time frame exonerates him totally irrelevant. In other words, this option could be used to say that the director DID have access to the script of Thieves before making The Big Heist, thus supporting the idea that copying did take place.
Choice C is an irrelevant comparison: The relation of Thieves to other films made by the studio does diddly to support the director’s claim, or even the studio’s argument for that matter. This is a complete left-field option.
Choice D does not have any kind of known impact on the argument by itself. For this option to be relevant, we’d have to lend the option the unwarranted assumption that the directors shared ideas, and even then, it would WEAKEN the director’s claim rather than support it.
Choice E would require us to make the unwarranted assumption that the director learned something about Thieves before making The Big Heist.
The Bigger Picture
There's an important lesson in this question: the assignment we're actually asked to complete.
Option B is not a slam dunk case for the director, but we're not actually asked to find a slam dunk case. What is this question asking us to do?
"Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director’s position?"
In that light, although B provides some support for the director, the other 4 options provide none, so B is 100% the answer to the assigned task even the it merely provides a shade of support.
Remember this lesson! The GMAT lavishly rewards those who actually follow instructions.
06 Aug 2018, 02:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
adkikani
generis KarishmaB pikolo2510 nightblade354 ammuseeru PKN
I fall time and again into classic trap of proving an argument and am unable
to reject incorrect choices with confidence because of this.
D: Film director
FS: Film studio
TBH: The Big Heist
T: Thieves
Main Conclusion of D: the accusation by FS does not have any sound evidence.
Context of argument:
On a time frame:
< - - - Present - - - ->
T came earlier - - - TBH is released in present.
There is a similarity in characters played in both films.
Hence FS claim D has stolen ideas for TBH from T
Supporting premise by D to counter FS : All prod work on TBH was completed long back before T was released.
So how could I have stolen ideas for my present film TBH?
I have a small query before moving to PoE:
How valid is the assumption that same director also directed T?
Can FS be falsely accusing D to negatively market TBH?
of scope choice.
Rejected the choice based on above grounds.
I fall time and again into classic trap of proving an argument and am unable
to reject incorrect choices with confidence because of this.
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?
Let us start with question stem: I need to strengthen D' claim. Let us know the claim and how D arrives at by reading the argument now.Quote:
Film Director: It is true that certain characters and plot twists in my newly released film The Big Heist are strikingly similar to characters and plot twists in Thieves, a movie that came out last year. Based on these similarities, the film studio that produced Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film. The accusation is clearly without merit. All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
D: Film director
FS: Film studio
TBH: The Big Heist
T: Thieves
Main Conclusion of D: the accusation by FS does not have any sound evidence.
Context of argument:
On a time frame:
< - - - Present - - - ->
T came earlier - - - TBH is released in present.
There is a similarity in characters played in both films.
Hence FS claim D has stolen ideas for TBH from T
Supporting premise by D to counter FS : All prod work on TBH was completed long back before T was released.
So how could I have stolen ideas for my present film TBH?
I have a small query before moving to PoE:
How valid is the assumption that same director also directed T?
Can FS be falsely accusing D to negatively market TBH?
Quote:
(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
Yes, but what are the chances the D getting hold of script of T? Does this choice necessarily weaken or is it neutral? Quote:
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
The highlighted text blew me off. In entire argument, all I am talking about is D, FD, T and TBH. I thought this as outof scope choice.
Quote:
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
How crucial is seldom ? I rejected this choice based on this keyword.Quote:
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
Here is where my relevant question before PoE matters. Can you explain if this choice is relevant?Quote:
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.
Hmm, timing <<--->> stealing / production. Could not see any connection with the argument. Rejected the choice based on above grounds.
Premises:
Some characters and plot twists in The Big Heist are strikingly similar to those in Thieves
Studio that produced Thieves is now accusing of taking ideas from that film.
All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
Conclusion: The accusation is clearly without merit.
We need to strengthen the conclusion that the accusation has no merit.
(A) Before Thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studios, including the studio that produced The Big Heist.
If the script had been circulating for a long time, it is possible that the Big Heist director saw it and got "inspired" by it. It does not strengthen our conclusion. If anything, it might weaken it.
(B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
This makes it likely that both Big Heist and Thieves are inspired by earlier films and hence they have characters and plot twists that are similar. This increases the possibility that the accusation is false and that Big Heist is not inspired by Thieves. This is the answer.
(C) The film studio that produced Thieves seldom produces films in this genre.
Irrelevant. Doesn't matter how many films the studio produces in this genre.
(D) The director of Thieves worked with the director of The Big Heist on several earlier projects.
If the two directors have worked together in the past, they could share a common style but it is very far fetched to assume that they will come up with same characters and plot lines. Option (B) is certainly much more specific since it says that there are past characters and plot lines from which both could have got inspired.
(E) The time it took to produce The Big Heist was considerably shorter than the time it took to produce Thieves.
Irrelevant. Just because Big Heist took less time, it doesn't mean it was inspired from another movie.
Answer (B)
