Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss! Oct 26 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to prethink assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes. Oct 27 07:00 AM EDT  09:00 AM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58434

For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2014, 03:38
Question Stats:
66% (01:46) correct 34% (01:48) wrong based on 1217 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x] = 0 ? (1) 1< x < 0.1 (2) [x + 0.5] = 1 Data Sufficiency Question: 96 Category: Algebra Operations with real numbers Page: 160 Difficulty: 650 The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58434

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2014, 03:38




Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Location: India

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2014, 04:07
Option A.
From S1:x=any value greater than 1 but less than 0.1.For every value of x, [x]=0 only.Sufficient.
From S2:x=0.1,0.2,0.3,...,0.5 OR x=0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4. Therefore,[x]=0 or 1.Not sufficient.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58434

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2014, 06:42



Manager
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 54
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Other
GMAT Date: 07312014
GPA: 3.99
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 May 2014, 10:33
et us do [2.4] What are the integers greater than or equal to 2.4? 3,4,5... What is the least among them? 3 So [2.4] = 3
What is [5]? Integers greater than or equal to 5 are 5,6,7,... Leats among them is 5. so [5] = 5
[] is called a step function. because, the graph looks like steps.
Hope this helps!!



Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 465
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2015, 04:48
(1) 1 < x < 0.1. It'S Sufficient, as it's within the range  IXI = 0 (2) [x + 0.5] = 1 > 0<x+0.5≤1 > −0.5<x≤0.5 Not sufficient, if x=0,2 > IXI = 0, if x=0,3 > IXI = 1
_________________
When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.
Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !
800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50 GMAT PREP 670 MGMAT CAT 630 KAPLAN CAT 660



Senior Manager
Status: Always try to face your worst fear because nothing GOOD comes easy. You must be UNCOMFORTABLE to get to your COMFORT ZONE
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 269
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25 GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 May 2016, 05:09
Bunuel wrote: Please advise how below statement can be formed : (2) [x + 0.5] = 1 > 0<x+0.5≤1
_________________
"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.”  Eric Thomas
I need to work on timing badly!!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7987

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 May 2016, 07:40
sairam95 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Please advise how below statement can be formed : (2) [x + 0.5] = 1 > 0<x+0.5≤1 hi [b]For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. so if [x+0.5] =1, x+0.5 has to be between 0 and 1 including 1.. if x+0.5 is between 0.999999 and 0, inclusive, then [x+0.5] =0.. basically what ever is betwen [] takes the higher integer value or same value if it is integer...
_________________



Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2014
Posts: 4

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2016, 08:09
Could you please explain the logic for the statement 2 .I understood [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z is meant by −1<x≤0.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9704
Location: Pune, India

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Sep 2016, 02:34
Ishanvs wrote: Could you please explain the logic for the statement 2 .I understood [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z is meant by −1<x≤0. "Least integer greater than or equal to z implies that [z] >= z but [z] takes the least value that it can. So if z = 0.3, [z] = 1 If z = 1.98, [z] = 2 Ques: Is [x] = 0? When will [x] be 0? When 1 < x <= 0 So we need to know whether 1 < x <= 0? Stmnt 2: [x + 0.5] = 1 Say, x + 0.5 = z Given: [z] = 1 If [z] = 1, then we know that 0 < z <= 1. Note that if z is 0, [z] = 0. If z > 1, then [z] > 1 too. This implies that 0 < x + 0.5 <= 1 Subtracting 0.5 from the inequality, we get 0.5 < x <= 0.5 We know that x lies between 0.5 and 0.5. Some of these values lie in the 1 to 0 range and some do not. Hence we can't say whether x will lie in the 1 to 0 range. Not sufficient alone.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 699
Location: United States
GPA: 2.66

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2017, 15:37
Okay has anyone actually seen a question like this on the actual GMAT? Maybe I'm crazy, but with Kaplan for example, there were lots of practice questions that did not prepare me for the actual GMAT. On the QA of the actual GMAT I took, there were much more questions like those on Veritas' prep CAT's lots of exponents, lots of algebra, lots of functions



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9704
Location: Pune, India

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2017, 20:40
Nunuboy1994 wrote: Okay has anyone actually seen a question like this on the actual GMAT? Maybe I'm crazy, but with Kaplan for example, there were lots of practice questions that did not prepare me for the actual GMAT. On the QA of the actual GMAT I took, there were much more questions like those on Veritas' prep CAT's lots of exponents, lots of algebra, lots of functions This question is from the Official Quant guide. So you could definitely see something like this in the actual GMAT.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 187
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2017, 00:18
Sorry does this 2nd statement show modulus??



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58434

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2017, 00:24
longhaul123 wrote: Sorry does this 2nd statement show modulus?? No. The stem introduces a function [], which rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ... The second statement also has the same function.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 20 May 2018
Posts: 5

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2018, 13:40
Bunuel  For statement 1, do we not consider 0.05? Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58434

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2018, 23:48
eishan123 wrote: Bunuel  For statement 1, do we not consider 0.05? Thanks (1) says: 1 < x < 0.1. Is 0.05 in that range?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 20 May 2018
Posts: 5

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jul 2018, 05:29
My mistake, I did not see the minus. Sorry about that.



Senior Manager
Status: Gathering chakra
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 434

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 May 2019, 16:10
1) 1 < x < 0.1 [x] = 0 when 1 < x ≤ 0 Sufficient.
(2) [x+0.5] = 1 Range of x is 0.5 < x < 0.5 If x is 0.4 then it rounds up to 0 If x is 0.4 then it rounds up to 1 Not sufficient.
A number line can be helpful to visualize.



Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 420
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jun 2019, 22:49
[x] = 0 iff 1<x<=0 Statement 1  Falls in the above range. Hence, Sufficient. Get rid of B,C,EStatement 2 says [x+0.5]=1. Now here x may be 0.1 i.e [x]=0 or x may be +0.1 i.e. [x]=1. Hence this is clearly insufficient. Get rid of option B too Clearly, A is the winner
_________________



Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Posts: 167
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31 GMAT 2: 640 Q45 V32

Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jul 2019, 09:36
Bunuel wrote: SOLUTION
For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x] = 0 ?
Some function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=2, [2]=2, [1.5]=1, ...
Question: is \([x]=0\)? > is \(1<x\leq{0}\)?
(1) 1 < x < 0.1. Sufficient.
(2) [x + 0.5] = 1 > \(0<x+0.5\leq{1}\) > \(0.5<x\leq{0.5}\). Not sufficient.
Bunuel, I read all the explanations in this post but still unable to understand how [x + 0.5] transforms into an inequality... Can you please elaborate? Thank you.




Re: For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[#permalink]
05 Jul 2019, 09:36






