GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Dec 2018, 15:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

December 16, 2018

December 16, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

December 16, 2018

December 16, 2018

03:00 PM EST

04:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics

# For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 188
Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 24 Nov 2012, 02:06
3
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

78% (01:52) correct 22% (02:09) wrong based on 290 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average. However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans. Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) There will be no sizeable decrease in Tyrannia’s aggregate land allocated to growing beans.
B) Since the shootings stopped and incomes grew, Tyrannia’s population has stayed practically unchanged.
C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
D) The price of neither lard nor beans is subject to controls by Tyrannia’s government.
E) Tyrannian people who increase consumption of lard will not drastically reduce consumption of beans.

Source: Grockit

Originally posted by shanmugamgsn on 23 Nov 2012, 18:21.
Last edited by shanmugamgsn on 24 Nov 2012, 02:06, edited 1 time in total.
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1131
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 00:02
shanmugamgsn wrote:
For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average. However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans. Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) There will be no sizeable decrease in Tyrannia’s aggregate land allocated to growing beans.
B) Since the shootings stopped and incomes grew, Tyrannia’s population has stayed practically unchanged.
C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
D) The price of neither lard nor beans is subject to controls by Tyrannia’s government.
E) Tyrannian people who increase consumption of lard will not drastically reduce consumption of beans.
Source: Grockit

I feel the answer must be E.
Conclusion: if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow., Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both
So there is a jump, over an assumption, from Red to blue.
1 pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans.
Consumption of lard is increasing as Tyrannia's income per capita is also increasing.
Upon the flow, Tyrannia will need to import beans only if the people are not growing the beans AND these people have continued the production of lard, without having reduced the consumption of beans.
Considering all this random stuff, I feel that the answer must be E.
Whats the OA?
_________________
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 188
Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 02:09
Marcab wrote:
shanmugamgsn wrote:
For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average. However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans. Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) There will be no sizeable decrease in Tyrannia’s aggregate land allocated to growing beans.
B) Since the shootings stopped and incomes grew, Tyrannia’s population has stayed practically unchanged.
C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
D) The price of neither lard nor beans is subject to controls by Tyrannia’s government.
E) Tyrannian people who increase consumption of lard will not drastically reduce consumption of beans.
Source: Grockit

I feel the answer must be E.
Conclusion: if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow., Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both
So there is a jump, over an assumption, from Red to blue.
1 pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans.
Consumption of lard is increasing as Tyrannia's income per capita is also increasing.
Upon the flow, Tyrannia will need to import beans only if the people are not growing the beans AND these people have continued the production of lard, without having reduced the consumption of beans.
Considering all this random stuff, I feel that the answer must be E.
Whats the OA?

Yes ur correct !!!
OA E

But why not C?
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like

Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 72
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 14:24
C is wrong as it ONLY talks about lard consumption amongst the population. We don't know anything about beans consumption. Thus we can't tell if beans supply will go down ultimately. It could but since this is an assumption question, we need to prove that it MUST and this answer doesn't do that.
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 946
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 21:24
Hi
this is an interpretation of OG 13 question 97 and ditto question from verbal review 2nd edition question 56.
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 946
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2012, 21:42
Conclusion: Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both

Premise 1 : For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average.

Premise 2 : However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans.

An assumption is unstated part of the argument which the author takes for granted. Its already stated in premise1 that they keep the demand low as to meet the consumption.Than its stated that consumption is directly propoetional to per capita income and thus they have to import either or both because they are not able to keep the demand low. Author is adamant about importing the stuff hence i think the conclusion assumes that its not possible to reduce the per capita income or the consumption (which is totally out of scope as the author concludes that either or both needs to be imported). It directly leaves a gap that per capita income will not reduce that implies the consumption will not reduce.

Coming to C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
Try negating it consumption of lard is not equal across all income level, I dont think that it affect the conclusion in any way as the conclusion states about importing either or both.....

Hope that helps>>>>>>>>
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 188
Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2012, 01:37
Archit143 wrote:
Conclusion: Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both

Premise 1 : For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average.

Premise 2 : However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans.

An assumption is unstated part of the argument which the author takes for granted. Its already stated in premise1 that they keep the demand low as to meet the consumption.Than its stated that consumption is directly propoetional to per capita income and thus they have to import either or both because they are not able to keep the demand low. Author is adamant about importing the stuff hence i think the conclusion assumes that its not possible to reduce the per capita income or the consumption (which is totally out of scope as the author concludes that either or both needs to be imported). It directly leaves a gap that per capita income will not reduce that implies the consumption will not reduce.

Coming to C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
Try negating it consumption of lard is not equal across all income level, I dont think that it affect the conclusion in any way as the conclusion states about importing either or both.....

Hope that helps>>>>>>>>

@Archit143
Thanks ya i got it...

@Marcab
Thanks dude
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like

Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2012
Posts: 17
Concentration: Technology, Real Estate
For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2014, 10:27
For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans and lard by keeping demand below average. However, consumption of lard per capita is increasing toward average as Tyrannia’s income per capita is increasing toward average, and producing one pound of lard requires multiple pounds of beans. Therefore, if income per capita keeps increasing while bean production cannot grow, Tyrannia will need to import beans, lard, or both.

Question
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Choices
A
There will be no sizeable decrease in Tyrannia’s aggregate land allocated to growing beans.
B
Since incomes increased, Tyrannia’s population size has stayed practically unchanged.
C
In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
D
The price of neither lard nor beans is subject to controls by Tyrannia’s government.
E
Tyrannian people who increase consumption of lard will not drastically reduce consumption of beans.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2618
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2015, 21:32
only E makes sense...but got it by POE...

A) There will be no sizeable decrease in Tyrannia’s aggregate land allocated to growing beans.
OFS, since we are not discussing the land allocated to growing beans. But if we negate this choice, the argument not only stands, but also becomes more convincing. thus, this cannot be the assumption.
B) Since the shootings stopped and incomes grew, Tyrannia’s population has stayed practically unchanged.
irrelevant
C) In Tyrannia, consumption of lard per capita is practically equal across all income levels.
this is weakening the conclusion, since the argument states that as the income increases, the consumption increases.
thus, it cannot be the assumption.
D) The price of neither lard nor beans is subject to controls by Tyrannia’s government.
even if the prices were controlled, it would not stop people to consume more.

E) Tyrannian people who increase consumption of lard will not drastically reduce consumption of beans.
negate this choice - the conclusion no longer stands. this is the correct answer.
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 08:47
On this topic, there are 2 different questions with 2 different patterns.
B,C,D are out of scope.
E is much better than A b/c A is strengthener.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 33
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 09:11
Why not B?.if population does not remain constant..and decreases then income per capita may become more even if income has not changef

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 09:18
vishwajeet2015 wrote:
Why not B?.if population does not remain constant..and decreases then income per capita may become more even if income has not changef

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

the conclusion here is whether to import bean, or lard or both => B does not help and does not give any new information.

"shootings stopped" and "constant demand" are enough to tell that B is out of scope.

My advice: stop thinking of how verbal in gmat works, just practicing 100 questions in a day, get 70% wrong, and you soon know why.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 33
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 09:28
chesstitans wrote:
vishwajeet2015 wrote:
Why not B?.if population does not remain constant..and decreases then income per capita may become more even if income has not changef

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

the conclusion here is whether to import bean, or lard or both => B does not help and does not give any new information.

"shootings stopped" and "constant demand" are enough to tell that B is out of scope.

My advice: stop thinking of how verbal in gmat works, just practicing 100 questions in a day, get 70% wrong, and you soon know why.

Didnt get you what u mean

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 09:45
Didnt get you what u mean

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app[/quote]

B is out of scope.
Only E sticks with the argument.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2014
Posts: 33
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 09:56
chesstitans wrote:
Didnt get you what u mean

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

B is out of scope.
Only E sticks with the argument.[/quote]

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2017, 11:15
vishwajeet2015 wrote:
chesstitans wrote:
Didnt get you what u mean

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

B is out of scope.
Only E sticks with the argument.

Sent from my SM-A510F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app[/quote]

well, Kaplan, Manhattan, Official guideline, learn idioms by heart, power score gmat bible, arstile role are enough to rock gmat.

Kaplan, manhattan, official guideline and power score gmat bible tells you the rules. To be good at gmat, just do at least 100 verbal questions a day, no more than 2.5 min per question, read the official explanations quickly, then memorize the pattern.
Re: For years, Tyrannia has supplied itself with enough beans &nbs [#permalink] 22 Sep 2017, 11:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by