GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2018, 18:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 199
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 09:05
7
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:04) correct 39% (02:13) wrong based on 400 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?


A. Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time.

B. Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment.

C. There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it.

D. Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions.

E. Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling.


This is from KAPLAN CAT.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesMath Revolution Discount CodesJamboree Discount Codes
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1856
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 09:17
2
Gambling experts say:

Provided there's advanced enough technology: Skilled technician will win almost every time.

hemanthp wrote:
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

-Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time. This would support the gambling expert's view point. We are asked to find something that would render the proposition useless
-Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment. This is a tricky one. It might appear right at first glance, but think about it - the gambling expert says "IF you have the tech, you can win almost every time" and this one says, "The tech is not available yet" so this indirectly alludes to a possible scenario that it WOULD be possible if only the tech had been available. Doesn't weaken the expert's argument. Hence incorrect
-There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it. This is correct. So if the computer technology is not as advanced, then even a skilled technician won't be able to bet on the right one every time/win. Directly contradicts his reasoning, hence correct
-Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions. Supports the argument!
-Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling. We don't care about this as it doesn't relate to the proposition at all

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT. - I notice that it's already there in your signature, please don't post questions simply for the purpose of attaining kudos. Make your contributions valuable instead and users will automatically feel inclined to give you kudos :)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1856
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 09:43
I think for CR you need to look at the nitty-gritty details. The second choice in this question for instance - that would be mildly tricky and I am hazarding a guess that it's an answer that most people would choose but get wrong.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 80
Schools: Wharton..:)
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2010, 03:56
conclusion :: such a claim could never be evaluated,
ask urself ? wht is " such a claim"..?
ans- such a claim is tht thr is no technology tht can help u in assessing the correct performance of the gambler BECAUSE evn the losses would be tempered..

so anything tht helps u in assessing the performance of a gambler is ur ans ..

go ahead ans solve ans should be B..:)
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2010, 05:14
1
Option C is correct.
In my opinion, C tells us that there is a logical link between the technology available and the success rate achievable. Thus, at least in future, such evaluation could be possible when such advanced technology is available.

HTH
--
Aman
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Schools: UNC Kenan-Flagler, IU Kelley, Emory GSB
WE 1: 5 yrs
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Nov 2010, 08:38
1
hemanthp wrote:
Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

-Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time.
-Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment.
-There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it.
-Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions.
-Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.


Hi Whiplash... I don't think I understood your explanation of the correct answer.

I get really lost it in such timekiller CRs :(. Though I got it correct, my reasoning isn't in line with the others.

My take on this is:
We have to prove that author is wrong - i.e. gambling experts' claim can be evaluated. i.e. there is no scope of blame game when there is a loss. i.e. the output is measurable.

C states that there is a direct correlation between technology and the level of success achieved by a technician. Hence, proficiency can be measured. This is sufficient to prove the author wrong.

Thats why i thought its the correct answer. Am i missing something??
_________________

The night is at its darkest just before the dawn... never, ever give up!


Originally posted by yossarian84 on 09 Nov 2010, 03:27.
Last edited by yossarian84 on 09 Nov 2010, 08:38, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 72
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2010, 08:31
argmnt :

advcd tech -> gmblr wins gamblng
But this can not be evaluted
If relation b\w 2 items establishes then this activity can be evaluated

ans = C that establishes relation b\w 2 items so one can be evaluated wrt to other
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 136
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2011, 19:51
B is not the answer because - we don't have gambling experts opinion if the equipment will be produced later on.
C is the answer.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 23
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2011, 00:05
what does the last sentence of the argument mean:
Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

cant get how the clause after 'for' is related to 'Yet such a claim could never be evaluated'

plz help
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 131
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2013, 07:56
Premise:
With advanced computer technology = success for skilled T
Author Disagrees, as losses can be bcoz immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.
How can this be untrue? If there is a known correlation between technology & success

C. There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it. ---> Talks about correlation. If you know x advance = x success. you cant blame technology.
D. Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions. --> Only Certain rare configurations of computer data = success Not necessary computer technology or skill
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3177
Premium Member
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2018, 04:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te &nbs [#permalink] 20 Sep 2018, 04:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer te

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.