Bunuel
Recent studies show that despite global efforts to reduce plastic waste by banning single-use plastics, the amount of plastic debris washing up on beaches has not decreased. Evidence of this is the consistent volume of plastic waste found during beach cleanups over the past year compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, environmental scientists have not concluded that these bans are ineffective.
Which of the following would, if true, provide the strongest reason for the scientists' reaction to the findings?
A. The production of single-use plastics has been significantly reduced in most countries over the past decade.
B. The amount of plastic waste produced annually varies significantly from year to year.
C. Many countries have implemented strict regulations against the use of single-use plastics in the past few years.
D. Strong ocean currents this year have carried more debris to coastal areas than usual.
E. Plastic waste can persist in the ocean environment for hundreds of years before decomposing.
Analysing every option:
A. The production of single-use plastics has been significantly reduced in most countries over the past decade.
This option suggests that the production of single-use plastics has decreased, which is a positive step towards reducing plastic waste. However, it doesn't directly address why the amount of plastic debris washing up on beaches has not decreased. It doesn't take into account the persistence of plastic waste that is already in the environment.
B. The amount of plastic waste produced annually varies significantly from year to year.
This option implies that the annual production of plastic waste is inconsistent, which might affect the amount of plastic debris found on beaches each year. However, it doesn't directly explain why the bans on single-use plastics have not resulted in a decrease in plastic waste washing up on beaches. Variability in production alone doesn't account for the persistence and accumulation of existing waste.
C. Many countries have implemented strict regulations against the use of single-use plastics in the past few years.
This option highlights the recent implementation of strict regulations, which should theoretically reduce plastic waste in the future. However, like option A, it doesn't address the persistence of existing plastic waste in the environment and why immediate effects of these bans are not observed in the amount of debris washing up on beaches.
D. Strong ocean currents this year have carried more debris to coastal areas than usual.
This option suggests that unusual ocean currents have brought more plastic debris to beaches this year. While this could explain a temporary increase in plastic waste on beaches, it doesn't address the overall persistence of plastic waste in the environment or the long-term effectiveness of single-use plastic bans.
E. Plastic waste can persist in the ocean environment for hundreds of years before decomposing.
This option provides the most comprehensive explanation. It acknowledges that even though efforts to reduce single-use plastics are in place, the plastic waste already present in the ocean can persist for a very long time. This long-term persistence means that the immediate effects of the bans may not be visible because the existing waste continues to wash up on beaches. It aligns with the scientists' reaction, as they recognize that the effectiveness of the bans cannot be judged solely on short-term observations of beach cleanups.
Therefore, E provides the strongest reason for the scientists' reaction to the findings.