Recent studies show that despite global efforts to reduce plastic waste by banning single-use plastics, the amount of plastic debris washing up on beaches has not decreased. Evidence of this is the consistent volume of plastic waste found during beach cleanups over the past year compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, environmental scientists have not concluded that these bans are ineffective.
Which of the following would, if true, provide the strongest reason for the scientists' reaction to the findings?
to to prove: these bans are effective,A. The production of single-use plastics has been significantly reduced in most countries over the past decade.
B. The amount of plastic waste produced annually varies significantly from year to year.
C. Many countries have implemented strict regulations against the use of single-use plastics in the past few years.
D. Strong ocean currents this year have carried more debris to coastal areas than usual.
E. Plastic waste can persist in the ocean environment for hundreds of years before decomposing.
Since plastic waste can persist in ocean environment, for hundred of years the impact of the ban may only be visible after a longer period. Hence option E maybe considered.
Option A states that the production has reduced significantly, but still the beaches are not clear of single use plastic. Does not make much of sense, eliminate.
Option B states Production amount is not fixed, hence beaches are not clear. There is no direct correlation between the two, hence eliminate
Option C states many countries have implemented strict regulations Against single use plastics still beaches are not clear again. Does not make much of sense, eliminate
Option D suggest that these states that since there is more amount of depress that has come with ocean currents, hence amount of single use plastic is more which intern suggests that ban is ineffective eliminate