EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi azoz7,
You've done enough studying to know that you need to work on your CR skills, which is good. However, there might actually be BIGGER issues that you should focus on first.
Since you've been studying for a month, you really MUST plan to take FULL-LENGTH CATs at regular intervals. This is the only way to truly track your progress. As such, you should plan to take one soon. Make sure to take the FULL CAT (with the Essay and IR sections) in a realistic fashion. Once you have that score result, you should post back here. Until we have that information, we have no way of knowing whether your studies are properly focused or not - and we don't know if you should be focused on some other category before you do additional work on CR.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
I took the CAT exam from MBA com. I am very disappointed in my score
Quant 8th percentile
Verbal 7th percentile
IR 37th percentile
AWA
"Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers-some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."
My analysis The author argues that the loud noise is not the explination why the company, which copied the motorcycle X design, has failed to attract the motercycle customers, he provides two evidance why the loud noise is not the reason for failing to attract X's customers. The two reasons are foreing cars are quieter than American-made car and the advertisments for the motorcycle do not promote the noisiness.
The author is assuming in the first evidance that the car customers and motorcycle customers are similar in their preferences, because car customers do not look for the noisiness as a feature of the car, maybe they are concern about the maintinance costs, which could be similar between the foreing cars and the American-made cars. Therefore, the author evidance does not explain why the noise is not the reason why customers by motorcycle X.
The second assumption is that the company does not promote the noise of engine in its TV advertisments for motorcycle X, but this does not mean the TV ads are the only mean of promotion for the motorcycle. The company might promote the motorcycle engine noisiness in other ad means, such as motorcycle conventions, which could attract more customers to the motorcycle.
Finally, the author did not support the provided evidance to strenghten his argument, and other interpetations of the same evidance could explain why the foreign company failed to attract motorcycle X customers.
End