It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 08:25

Live Now:

GMAT Verbal Live on YouTube: Join Now!


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1398 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2008, 19:28
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (00:45) correct 19% (00:38) wrong based on 172 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

102. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.

A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1398 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Mumbai
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2008, 19:50
The answer would be D - and compared is right.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Mumbai
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2008, 21:14
I see your point - B seems more appropriate.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Stanford GSB
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 14:06
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves

Last edited by JarvisR on 10 Apr 2016, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.
Moved to correct forum and added OA

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 540

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 14:52
IMO B

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 960

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 5

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 15:24
Interested in why C would be wrong...

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 5

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 540

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 15:36
In C IMO you are comparing running vs those....i.e. verb vs noun...which is wrong
bigfernhead wrote:
Interested in why C would be wrong...

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 17:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Ans B. Use 'compare with' when comparing similar things and 'compare to' for dissimilar things. e.g. Compare my signature with your signature (signatures are two similar things). I compared her smile to the sun (person and sun and dissimilar)

Even if I didn't know the difference btn compare to and compare with, the other answers have issues as shown below

Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
those should be compared to people not the verb running.
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
Correctly compares nonrunners to people
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
Same as A, comparing verb running to 'those'
D. When compared with those who do not ??, people running three days a week save
When is unnecessary here. Secondly, when compared with those who do not do what? Sentence shouldn't leave you hanging
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves
Same as A, cannot compare nonrunners to a verb.

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 20:11
I too think its B.Only B has the correct comparison comparing those who do not run with people who run.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Stanford GSB
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2009, 22:58
Good explanation leswm. :-D
I kudo to you.

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2009, 02:07
compare with is used for similar things while compare to is used for dissimilar things. So, A,C and E are out. now b/w B and D, D is unnecessarily wordy. B uses correct comparison, correct idiom and is most precise. so ans B.
sandipchowdhury wrote:
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 459

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2009, 10:06
sandipchowdhury wrote:
Good explanation leswm. :-D
I kudo to you.

Is the OA B?
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 4

Intern
Intern
avatar
Affiliations: USGBC
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Texas
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2010, 13:24
Compared with -- emphasizes differences
Compared to-- emphasizes similarities.

OA is B

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 75

Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2014, 02:39
I think everybody has given correct answer , but not a good explanation.

This question is dealing with two issues

a) Comparisons b) Subject Verb Agreement (People --->save)

Now let's analyze the choices

a) Comparing People with running ---------------- wrong choice.
c) Compares not running with People.---------------- wrong choice.
d) Comparison is correct , but the use of when is ambiguous. ---------------- wrong choice.
e) Comparing Non-runners to running.---------------- wrong choice.

The only obvious choice is B.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 75

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2014, 06:25
Compared to OR
Compared with.

Logic: We use 'Compared to' when we compare 'Similarities' and we use 'Compared with' when we compare the 'Differences'.

Here we are comparing nonrunners with people who do not run.
A,C and E are out.

B. 'Nonrunners' parallel to 'People' (Noun // Noun)- Correct answer
D. 'Those who do not run' not parallel to 'people running' (Pronoun // Gerund or ING Verb)

Hope it helps!

Ray

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 137

Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2015, 03:00
sandipchowdhury wrote:
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves


The issue at hand is not with the usage of compared to and compared with. Their usage is a debatable topic and has been inconclusive.
Refer to this link, where Ron admits that the usage is uncertain.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t2071.html

If you see this on your exam, be assured that the GMAC guys are not testing you for this. Coming back to the original question - you cannot compare apples to oranges.
You want to compare non runners to runners!
A. You are comparing non runners to running. OUT
B. Comparing non runners to runners. CORRECT
C. Comparing not running to runners. OUT
D. Awkward sentence. B is clearer. OUT
E. Comparing non runners to running. OUT

B is the only answer choice free of logical and grammatical problems.

+Kudos, if this helped! :lol:
_________________

Its not over..

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 137

SVP
SVP
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2138

Kudos [?]: 1599 [0], given: 8

Location: New York, NY
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2015, 11:12
sandipchowdhury wrote:
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves


This question is not testing the difference between "compared to" vs "compared with" -- either approach could potentially be fine.

But what this question is testing you on is apples vs oranges -- what we refer to as framework #2.

The left side needs to match the right side.

For (A) -- you'd have to say "Compared to those who do not run, those who DO run blah blah blah" -- that's how you maintain consistency. The "running three days a week" is not consistent with "those who do not"..

Same thing with (C) ----and really all the choices except (B). With (B) - you are comparing "nonrunners" with "people who run 3 days a week" -- so you are comparing people with people -- so that matches.

Make sure you know what is being tested -- because if you think you are being tested on something else, you can waste a lot of time -- and on a test like this, every second counts.

Kudos [?]: 1599 [0], given: 8

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 116

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 317

Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '18 (S)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q44 V41
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Reviews Badge
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2016, 23:09
sandipchowdhury wrote:
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves



Mirror mirror on the wall.. who's the fairest of them all.. :idea:

A--Well ofcourse you cant compare humans to an activity---ELIMINATE
B--A PROMISING OPTION
C-- Reason of elimination is same as that of A.
D--In my opinion, the sentence is wrong as the words 'those who do not' just dangle in between creating confusion.
E--Reason of elimination is same as that of A.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 317

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 109

GPA: 3.92
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2016, 14:53
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.

A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves

B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save

C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save

D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save

E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves

================================================================================================


Good luck! +1 kudos if you like the post!

Last edited by StoicBread on 31 Dec 2016, 10:17, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 109

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 16

Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2016, 03:56
to me its B.
correct comparison , rest it either lengthy or doesn't make sense
_________________


+1 kudos, if you like the post :wink:

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 16

Re: Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves   [#permalink] 31 Dec 2016, 03:56

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.