sandipchowdhury
Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves an average of 14.1 percent on health-care costs each year in the United States.
A. Compared to those who do not, running three days a week saves
B. Compared with nonrunners, people who run three days a week save
C. Compared to not running, those running for three days a week save
D. When compared with those who do not, people running three days a week save
E. When compared to nonrunners, running three days a week saves
The issue at hand is not with the usage of
compared to and
compared with. Their usage is a debatable topic and has been inconclusive.
Refer to this link, where Ron admits that the usage is uncertain.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t2071.htmlIf you see this on your exam, be assured that the GMAC guys are not testing you for this. Coming back to the original question - you cannot compare apples to oranges.
You want to compare non runners to runners!
A. You are comparing non runners to running. OUT
B. Comparing non runners to runners. CORRECT
C. Comparing not running to runners. OUT
D. Awkward sentence. B is clearer. OUT
E. Comparing non runners to running. OUT
B is the only answer choice free of logical and grammatical problems.
+Kudos, if this helped!