gmatg01
Studying for CFA or CAIA was pretty straight forward... get some review course like Kaplan and just hammer through the books a few times and do practice tests online. Primary course of action though was getting through the material, studying formulas, etc. It made self study pretty easy, regardless of the tests being difficult. (the CFA was tough, not CAIA) Anyways my question is -- am I correct in that the idea behind the GMAT exam is just practice exams? All the guides are just massive bunches of questions. Which is fine, I am just new to this and was curious if I am reading the study process the right way in that cranking through as many questions as possible to cover as many different types of questions at different complexities is the idea here. Sorry I didn't see a direct answer to that question soon enough, I am sure its been covered before, but found it easier to just ask and get input. Thanks.
Hi Mate,
welcome to GMAT Club. As practice has demonstrated, quantity doesn't beat quality on GMAT. To excel at a specific type of questions, you need to know how to approach the question. Majority of questions, by the way, do not test knowledge of the formulas. GMAT rather tests your logic; how you can eliminate the wrong answers by applying it. As a person who took way too many practice questions, I strongly advise that you first try to look at the type of questions you would see on GMAT. There are a lot of guides on how to approach each type of questions. By mastering the fundamentals, you sure have a good chance to score in the highest percentiles.
Good luck with your studies!