insightia
Hi bb, Ulviya,
the raw scores are Quant: 39, Verbal: 29. Analyzing things, I think I did far worse on the verbal than I had ever done in my practice tests. I am not a native speaker, but almost a native speaker(exposure to English from very early on). My verbal skills in general are pretty good(I write articles for magazines etc.). I did not have time to attempt the questions at the end, but I had time just to click them and go ahead. Also, the funny thing is in the quantitative section, I felt the questions were easy for me till the 20th and then it started getting a little more complicated after 21(This does not match, the curve depicted on this web site on the complexity of math questions on the test). I am wondering whether this is because I screwed up on the early questions or what?
I am definitely going to re-take the text(As I have said, I have put in a lot and I am too unhappy with the results).
Could timing be the issue here, I dont know how good a job I did during the test, as far as time management goes. Also, I did not see any probability questions on the test(though I did see combinations) - and I think I did pretty well on that.
Could you please give me your perspective as to my raw scores. Also on the score report, do they break down how one did in each section(eg SC, RC , CR etc.).
Do you think, if I improve my score significantly, I still have a good chance at the top schools. THe rest of my app should be pretty good.
Thanks a bunch
Hey, Insightia,
Well, I am not sure what you mean perspective on the Raw Score, but I guess you know from your unofficial report, that those are 59% and 55% respectively, contributing to 61 percentile overall...
Well, the question I have is Do you feel comfortable with any of the sections, question types? (Reason I am asking is I felt very secure on math, and was not too careful with it, and as the result got 92 percentile on it, while being more careful wiht verbal, got 96th).
I knew a person who had your situation. He went through all possible books and materials but had 550. His problem was that he never followed a strategy but one - RUNAWAY. When he would get a test, he would try to run through it as fast as he could, as a person running through the forest for life. His eyes were filled with fear of anohter failure and his hands shaking due to the ticking of the clock.
Do you have a strategy that you follow for math/verbal section?
If so, can you tell me how you deal with CR questions.
Also, from on top of your head how much is 1/8?
Part II
I would say that's one of the main reasons people don't score high enough - time pressure. You have mentioned that you have not finished either of the sections, which is a hit to your score, whether you ran through the problmes and randomly plugged answers or just left it there.
What was the reason you did not finish on time? you spent too much time in the middle?
(one of the answers why the mid quant was difficult is that you may have had only fairly easy questions in the beginning. Your story sounds very contrary to the usual layout. On the other hand, ETS might have had an experiment, who knows)
Part III
Here is the situation you face.... not a very comfortable one: you have worked through all the possible materials and you have answered all the possible questions out there, so, in reality none of the tests you do from now on, will be representative of your score, this makes practice complicated.
I think I will stop here and will wait for your replies to the above questions...
P.S. in the score report they don't break down much. The only additional useful information you get is the AWA score. It is only one sheet of paper that has your name/address/other info, date and gmat score, and schools you sent the report to, if any.
Bogdan.
P.P.S. Your chances to enter a school should be pretty good. Often the admissions can tell you, if they are nice enough, whether your scores are too low and you need to retake the GMAT, but that depends on what school you pick. Some are extremely arrogant and don't want to have anything to do with applicants, which I think is scornful.