It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 15:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42571

Kudos [?]: 135392 [0], given: 12691

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2017, 00:11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

47% (01:07) correct 53% (01:16) wrong based on 16 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Kudos [?]: 135392 [0], given: 12691

VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 1117

Kudos [?]: 397 [0], given: 640

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2017, 14:03
Bunuel wrote:
Image

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5% between 1940 and 1972?

(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4

Stacked column charts are hard. Each vertical bar typically, as here, contains numbers that must be calculated by chopping the bar into segments and subtracting height values to get amounts.

Despite my familiarity with graphs, and despite believing that the answer was "zero," I was not certain. These numbers can be hard to eyeball.

All numbers discussed are in millions.

So I solved by:
1) finding the population number in 1940
2) calculating what would = 5 percent growth, and
3) without being exact, seeing whether or not the 1972 figure was greater than my calculated growth figure.

If so, growth was greater than 5 percent.

The numbers as I measured them:

NORTHEAST
1940 = 40. Add 5 percent, = 42. 1972 figure (difference between top and bottom lines of solid dark gray part) is greater than 42

NORTH CENTRAL
1940 = 30. Add 5 percent = 31.5. 1972 figure (difference between top and bottom lines of cross-hatched gray part) is greater than 31.5

SOUTH
1940 = 40. Same as Northeast. 1972 figure (difference between top and bottom lines of light gray part) is greater than 42

WEST
1940 = 20. Add 5 percent = 21. 1972 figure (difference between top and bottom lines of solid white part) is greater than 21

ANSWER A

Peanut gallery: you do not have to look at the chart.

I have experience with graphs.
In case reading this kind of graph is not familiar, I have attached the way I measured each region.
I would not replicate this detail on test day.
But you do have to be able to ballpark it. These annotations show how to calculate fairly accurate figures.
Finding the numbers on the annotated graph took me about 2.5 minutes. The method I used to answer the question took one minute.

Notice that the top of one region constitutes the bottom of another. Beginning numbers in the same color as previous region indicate as much.
Finally, circled numbers are totals from 1940 and 1972; they are what need to be compared.

To measure growth:
1) find 1940 lower end value, from where the line on the bottom of the segment that corresponds with the region "hits" on the left side of graph (e.g. North Central is hatched crosswise)
2) subtract from 1940 higher end value, found by seeing where the top line from that segment hits on the left side of graph - that is the 1940 population number
3) do the same for 1972 - that is the 1972 population number
4) divide 1972 by 1940 - you will get a 1.xx figure. The .xx is the percentage growth in decimal form

How the numbers fell out as I read them:

NORTHEAST:
1940 = 40
1972 = 50
50/40 = 1.25 = 25 percent growth

NORTH CENTRAL
1940 = 30
1972 = 55
55/30 = 1.83 = 83 percent growth

SOUTH
1940 = 40
1972 = 70
70/40 = 1.75 = 75 percent growth

WEST
1940 = 20
1972 = 30
30/20 = 1.5 = 50 percent growth

None of the regions experienced less than 5 percent growth - Answer A
Attachment:
popchart.png
popchart.png [ 74.39 KiB | Viewed 182 times ]

Kudos [?]: 397 [0], given: 640

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5   [#permalink] 29 Oct 2017, 14:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

How many of the regions shown had a population increase of less than 5

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.