fireagablast
I mean..i get the -100 is less than 9, and therefore less than x, but how are we going to have x^2 be negative?
Just seems like a silly question to ask if the answer is basically a non-answer..
I mean the "solution" says less about the problem than what's actually given in the problem..
Hello fireagablast,
Sometimes, I think you should not look at things in their literal sense. You need to scratch beneath the surface to understand the hidden meaning.
The range here takes care of values smaller than 9.0001 which option C doesn’t.
In fact I would argue that this is brilliant question with exceptional answer options. There are a couple of options which you know are certainly not the answers. But, it’s the sliver of a difference between options C and D that make this a challenging one. However, option C actually provides a subtle clue that there CAN be values smaller than 9.0001. Students who take this clue end up escaping from the trap answer, others don’t.
Come to think of this, the answer options actually tell a lot about the given range i.e. 3<x<7.
And many time, this is what GMAT does on difficult questions. It tests your biases and very often, students are sub-consciously biased to take easy values (that smacks of a comfort zone). The clock ticking at the back of their brains also contributes to their making such errors of judgement.
Therefore, when a range like 3<x<7 is given, it’s important to try a value which you would otherwise not try – i.e. get out of your comfort zone and try values like 3.0000000001, because that’s certainly in the given range. A range/inequality given in a question is an open invitation for you to try extreme values (pun not intended).
Hope that helps!