Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 512
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)

In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 28 Jan 2018, 00:03
Question Stats:
32% (02:05) correct 68% (02:19) wrong based on 402 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Attachment:
5033f36b5ff1481cbda271f312ce5212.jpg [ 73.52 KiB  Viewed 4985 times ]
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
If my Post helps you in Gaining Knowledge, Help me with KUDOS.. !!
Originally posted by rahul16singh28 on 27 Jan 2018, 21:07.
Last edited by Bunuel on 28 Jan 2018, 00:03, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8138

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jan 2018, 21:48
rahul16singh28 wrote: Please give Kudos, if it helps you in Preparing for GMAT. An immediate observation... 16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12 Only 8 and 10 are possible.. x=10 can be found from 2nd line and 5th line. B Let's check all.. Let number lines 1, 2,3,4,5 from left.. 1) let's see 1 PARALLEL to others. 1 ll 2.... x+2x=180...x=60... Not given 1 ll 3.....x=4x....not possible 1 ll 4....x+8x=180...x=20..E 1 ll 5...x=16x...not possible 2) 2 2 ll 3...2x+4x=180...x=30.. not given 2 ll 4 ...2x=8x...not possible 2 ll 5 ...2x+16x=180..x=10..B 3) 3rd 3 ll 4..4x+8x=180....x=15..C 3 ll 5...4x=16x ...not possible 4) 4th 4 ll 5..16x+8x=180... Not possible as X will not be an integer So possible values of x are 10,15 and 20 But possible is only 10.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 8

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2018, 10:22
chetan2u wrote: rahul16singh28 wrote: Please give Kudos, if it helps you in Preparing for GMAT. An immediate observation... 16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12 Only 8 and 10 are possible.. x=10 can be found from 2nd line and 5th line. B Let's check all.. Let number lines 1, 2,3,4,5 from left.. 1) let's see 1 PARALLEL to others. 1 ll 2.... x+2x=180...x=60... Not given 1 ll 3.....x=4x....not possible 1 ll 4....x+8x=180...x=20..E 1 ll 5...x=16x...not possible 2) 2 2 ll 3...2x+4x=180...x=30.. not given 2 ll 4 ...2x=8x...not possible 2 ll 5 ...2x+16x=180..x=10..B 3) 3rd 3 ll 4..4x+8x=180....x=15..C 3 ll 5...4x=16x ...not possible 4) 4th 4 ll 5..16x+8x=180... Not possible as X will not be an integer So possible values of x are 10,15 and 20 But possible is only 10. How did you know that 16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12 What is the reasoning behind your solution? Your help is much appreciated



Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Posts: 44

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2018, 20:41
Quote: How did you know that 16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12
What is the reasoning behind your solution?
Your help is much appreciated Hi, Because the greatest angle is 180 (a line) => 16x is an angel (which is obviously shown in the figure) => 16x must be < 180 Hope it's clear



Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2017
Posts: 19

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Feb 2018, 04:19
Hello, why 15 and 20 are not possible? Thanks



Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2017
Posts: 22

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2018, 10:07
I am getting confused here. With x=15, the lines with 4x and 8x will also be parallel.
So, why are we bothered about any other line?



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 465
Location: India
GPA: 3.5

In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2018, 05:21
I did this,
for lines with angles 4x and 8x to be parallel => 4x + 8x = 12x = 180, x = 15 for lines with angles 2x and 16x to be parallel => 2x + 16x = 18x = 180, x = 10 (minimum so far) tried with x = 8, found none to be parallel.
So answer (B)



Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2017
Posts: 51
Concentration: Strategy, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.71

In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 30 Aug 2018, 18:58
Corrected: I made table for all values of x and tried searching for equal values in columns A,C and D or in columns B, and E; or Supplementary angles one from either columns A,C, and D; and one from either B, and E.
Attachments
1535680630937403145196769194509.jpg [ 1.97 MiB  Viewed 2958 times ]
_________________
Everything is in flux, nothing stays still
MGMAT1 :590 Q42 V30 (07/07/18) VERITAS :660 Q48 V33 (16/07/18) GMATPREP1 :690 Q46 V36 (22/07/18) GMATPREP2 :740 Q51 V39 (06/08/18) ECONOMIST :740 Q49 V44 (11/08/18) KAPLAN :690 Q49 V36 (17/08/18) PRINCETON :690 Q48 V38 (26/08/18) MGMAT2 :720 Q43 V45 (02/09/18)
Originally posted by Blackishmamba on 23 Aug 2018, 18:23.
Last edited by Blackishmamba on 30 Aug 2018, 18:58, edited 1 time in total.



BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 508
Location: India
GPA: 4

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2018, 18:41
hey adkikani Bunuel chetan2uCan you tell why x = 15, 18 or 20 not possible? Technically all of them can form an angle with the line (x  axis). Any angle greater than 180 will change the quadrant. Let me know what is incorrect with my understanding here
_________________



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9764
Location: Pune, India

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2018, 22:46
rahul16singh28 wrote: Attachment: The attachment 5033f36b5ff1481cbda271f312ce5212.jpg is no longer available Tricky question and here is why  shown angles are angles between two lines (not line segments). So think about this  how will you show a 320 degrees angle? Attachment:
angle320degrees.png [ 3.66 KiB  Viewed 3181 times ]
Note that two intersecting lines make 4 angles around the point of intersection such that vertically opposite angles are equal. Can one of the angles be 320 degrees? The other needs to be 320 degrees too. If a is 320, c needs to be 320 too! Attachment:
images13.png [ 1.56 KiB  Viewed 3195 times ]
Hence, the options (C), (D) and (E) are not possible. Now it is just about looking for a pair of supplementary angles. If x = 10, 2x + 16x = 18x = 180 So 2x = 20 degrees and the angle supplementary to 16x would be 20 degrees too making these two lines parallel. Answer (B)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 929

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Sep 2018, 09:24
IS THIS from gmatprep? pls, shot the screen



Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2017
Posts: 44
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)

In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Dec 2018, 01:42
Hmmn my approach was to not be distracted by the picture and was similar to what was discussed above.
1) Look at the properties of parallel lines  for 2 lines to be parallel, there must be a perpendicular line joining these two lines (whether it's  or crossing both lines i.e. ).
2) Any angle subtended by the perpendicular line, would have be 90 degrees.
3) With this, I tried adding the different x's together with the following: a) x + 2x = 180, x = 60 (not in answer choice, immediately calibrate approach by trying combination of x's that can give me 180 degrees) b) 2x + 16x = 180 > x = 10
Answer: B.



Manager
Joined: 27 Nov 2015
Posts: 120

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2019, 04:15
16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12
I do not understand this statement. my assumption would have been that 16x<=90 not 180



Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2017
Posts: 44
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)

Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Feb 2019, 02:16
nausherwan wrote: 16x is an angle, so 16x<180.... x<12
I do not understand this statement. my assumption would have been that 16x<=90 not 180 Hi nausherwan, I think the key is not to be distracted by how the initial diagram is being drawn (definitely not to scale). The key principle to follow here is that opposite complementary angles split by a straight line (or lines) should add up to be 180 degrees. There are different combinations that can be explored in the diagram above, so it's about finding one that works AND that is stated in the answer choice. Hope this clarifies. tinytiger




Re: In the figure above, all the marked angles are some multiple of x
[#permalink]
16 Feb 2019, 02:16






