Hi Chiranjeev,
Thanks for the clarification and a "BIGER

" thank for pointing these questions.
Now first let me try these questions then I will discuss my takeaway.
Believe it or not, I have not looked the OAs for these questions. I wait for your response.
1)Sviatovin is a medieval Moringian text whose author and exact date of composition are unknown. However, the events in the life of Prince Sviatov that the text describes occurred in 1165, and in the diagram of Sviatov's family that accompanies the text his father, who died in 1167, is identified as still living. Thus Sviatovin must have been written between 1165 and 1167, assuming that.
P1)...events described happened in 1165
p2)...S's father who died in 1167 was alive in the text.
=>Concl: Sviatovin must have been written between 1165 and 1167
My pre-thinking assumption (as I wrote on paper):
-Sviatovin is not a work of fiction...the family diagram is real depiction of events described.Choice C is even more narrow and well defined "to the point" Assumption.(A) the life of Prince Sviatov is not the subject of any other medieval Moringian texts
Even if it is the case how that will say help me find out when S was written ? OFS(B) the author of Sviatovin intended it to provide as accurate a report about Prince Sviatov's exploits as possible
1)What is as accurate a report as possible mean here ? 2) How author's accuracy is going to help me find the time whaen the text was written?(C) the diagram accurately represents the composition of Sviatov's family at the time Sviatovin was written
A narrowed down/in the line (compared to my pre-thought assumption) 'to the point' assumption(D) Sviatovin is the earliest Moringian text whose composition can be dated to within a few years
1)OFS 2) "within a few year" what does that mean? 2, 20, or 50 ???(E) Sviatovin was not written by Sviatov's father himself
Anyone can write the text, why only S's father?--------------------------
2) Although parapsychology is often considered a pseudoscience, it is in fact a genuine scientific enterprise, for it uses scientific methods such as controlled experiments and statistical tests of clearly stated hypotheses to examine the questions it raises.
The conclusion above is properly drawn if which of the following is assumed?
P1)parapsychology is often considered a pseudoscience
P2)for it uses scientific methods such as controlled experiments and statistical tests of clearly stated hypotheses to examine the questions it raises
=>Concl: parapsychology is in fact a genuine scientific enterprise
Pre-thought assumption (as I wrote on paper):
A1):Any field of study that uses scientific methods to examine the questions it raises CAN be a genuine scientific enterprise
(A) If a field of study can conclusively answer the questions it raises, then it is a genuine science.
OFS(B) Since parapsychology uses scientific methods, it will produce credible results.
RESULTS??? iSWAT(C) Any enterprise that does not use controlled experiments and statistical tests is not genuine science.
iSWAT, talks about examples gives in the arguments but not relevant (D) Any field of study that employs scientific methods is a genuine scientific enterprise.
A broader assumption than my pre-thought assumption(E) Since parapsychology raises clearly statable questions, they can be tested in controlled experiments.
OFS--------------------------
3)In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
P1)...cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists
P2)But since furniture must be useful,
P3) cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product (they pay attention to practical utility of their product = they make them useful)
=> Concl: (For this reason; P1+2+3) cabinetmaking is not art
Pre-thought assumption (as I wrote on paper):
A1)Things which are made for practical utility cannot contain art
A2) Any useful article cannot be a piece of art(A) Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
OFS(B) Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
SO WHAT? OFS how it is related with whether Cabinetmakers are artist or not (C) Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
SO WHAT? how it is related with whether Cabinetmakers are artist or not (D) An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object’s practical utility.
Almost paraphrase of my pre-thought assumption(E) Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
OFS--------------------------
Analysis, Conclusion and Takeaway (for me):
1)Rahul is more informed...
a1) Rahul must have read that particular email - the ABSOLUTE minimum, the most narrowed down assumption
a2) Rahul has read every mail that he received - A wider assumption which contain the above assumption
2)Sviatovin is a medieval Moringian....
I came up with just some vague idea... no good assumption phrase.
the ABSOLUTE minimum, the most narrowed down assumption will be:
a1)the diagram accurately represents the composition of Sviatov's
father[/u] at the time Sviatovin was written
A wider assumption would be:
a2)the diagram accurately represents the composition of Sviatov's [u]family at the time Sviatovin was written
* a diagram can have only one time frame, so if his fathers description was right then tah twill apply to the whole diagram and so to his family, i.e. a1) implies a2) and vice versa.
3)Although parapsychology is often considered a pseudoscience
the ABSOLUTE minimum, the most narrowed down assumption will be;
a1) Any field of study that uses scientific methods to examine the questions it raises CAN be a genuine scientific enterprise -
A wider assumption (containing a1) would be:
a2) Any field of study that employs scientific methods is a genuine scientific enterprise.
- a1 is contained in a2
4)In recent years many cabinetmakers have be
here a1 and a2 are essentially same
Conclusion and Takeaway (for me):
1) Sometime (may be many times) a broader assumption which contain the ABSOLUTE narrowed down assumption are the right assumption 2) The pre-thought assumption might be a wider/broader assumption, the choice may give a narrowed down assumption. *some of the choices are so out of context that I have to use wt* in place of OFS
Waiting to see your response,
The Rebellion!