Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included. Class starts Saturdays Sept. 26, 2026 - Dec. 19, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm ES
Hello guys. I've completed my second practice test. I was using Princeton review practice. I've scored Quantitative 44, though I've made 4 mistakes (1 in experimental problem). is it possible to get such a low score for this number of incorrect answers on real test?! I know that it matters on which questions you've made mistakes (on easy ones or difficult ones), but still ?! What is the maximum number of incorrect answers to score above 49?! Can algorithm be way too conservative or is it realistic?!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
There's no real way to know, specifically, whether PR's algorithm is correct. The GMAC tells test prep companies very little about its scoring algorithm - we know the basic math behind it (Google 'item response theory' if you want a taste of what's going on behind the scenes!), but very few of the actual numbers. The best you can do is to take one or more official GMAC GMATPrep practice tests and go from there - for obvious reasons, their algorithm is the most accurate, although their practice tests aren't as good in other ways (for instance, the explanations are bad to nonexistent.)
There's no real way to know, specifically, whether PR's algorithm is correct. The GMAC tells test prep companies very little about its scoring algorithm - we know the basic math behind it (Google 'item response theory' if you want a taste of what's going on behind the scenes!), but very few of the actual numbers. The best you can do is to take one or more official GMAC GMATPrep practice tests and go from there - for obvious reasons, their algorithm is the most accurate, although their practice tests aren't as good in other ways (for instance, the explanations are bad to nonexistent.)
Show more
Thanks, I've purchased Navigator from Manhattan and 6 practice tests, hope it will enhance my skills, particularly in verbal secton. But overall, i think that 44 score in quant for 4 mistakes is unfair :D
I'll be blunter: PR's algorithm is wrong. There's no way you can possibly get a 44 on quant while missing just 4 questions -- that's not ever going to happen to you on a real GMAT exam. In fact, it's actually possible to miss more than 4 questions on a GMATPrep test (and presumably on a real GMAT) and still get a 51. Here, enjoy some weirdness: https://www.gmatninja.com/2013/01/25/gma ... algorithm/
Of course, the number of questions you miss will never, by itself, determine your GMAT score. You probably already know this, but which questions you miss matters more than how many you miss. So you could miss the name number of questions as your neighbor, and get a wildly different score.
And ccooley is, as usual, absolutely right: the exact GMAT algorithm is a closely guarded secret. But your result on the PR exam would never happen on a GMATPrep, for whatever it's worth.
I'll be blunter: PR's algorithm is wrong. There's no way you can possibly get a 44 on quant while missing just 4 questions -- that's not ever going to happen to you on a real GMAT exam. In fact, it's actually possible to miss more than 4 questions on a GMATPrep test (and presumably on a real GMAT) and still get a 51. Here, enjoy some weirdness: https://www.gmatninja.com/2013/01/25/gm ... algorithm/
Of course, the number of questions you miss will never, by itself, determine your GMAT score. You probably already know this, but which questions you miss matters more than how many you miss. So you could miss the name number of questions as your neighbor, and get a wildly different score.
And ccooley is, as usual, absolutely right: the exact GMAT algorithm is a closely guarded secret. But your result on the PR exam would never happen on a GMATPrep, for whatever it's worth.
Show more
Thanks GMATNinja. I'm going to finish all PR practices, just to enhance my stamina and concentration. Next I'll probably do Kaplan and Manhattan Practices. Hope their Algorithms are less weirder. Low scores lets me down
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.