Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join a FREE 1-day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today!
Join a FREE live webinar with examPAL and Admissionado and learn how to master GMAT Critical Reasoning questions and the 6-pointed star of MBA application essay glory. Save your spot today!
We'll be posting questions in DS/PS/SC/CR in competition mode. Detailed and quickest solution will get kudos. Will be collecting new links to all questions in this topic. Here you can also check links to fresh questions posted.
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2013, 02:25
2
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.
a + b + c =180°
(1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° --> a + c =120° --> b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient.
(2) a = 2b − c --> a + c =2b --> 2b + b = 180° --> b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient.
Answer: E.
Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
_________________
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 06:08
Bunuel wrote:
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.
a + b + c =180°
(1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° --> a + c =120° --> b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient.
(2) a = 2b − c --> a + c =2b --> 2b + b = 180° --> b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient.
Answer: E.
Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions....
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 06:13
avaneeshvyas wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.
a + b + c =180°
(1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° --> a + c =120° --> b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient.
(2) a = 2b − c --> a + c =2b --> 2b + b = 180° --> b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient.
Answer: E.
Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions....
Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question.
_________________
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 11:21
Bunuel wrote:
avaneeshvyas wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.
a + b + c =180°
(1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° --> a + c =120° --> b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient.
(2) a = 2b − c --> a + c =2b --> 2b + b = 180° --> b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient.
Answer: E.
Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions....
Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question.
I am sorry but I seem to miss something here.....to identify a triangle as an isosceles one, we either need to prove two sides equal or the opposite angles equal.....if yes then we do need the measure of individual angles
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 11:25
Bunuel wrote:
avaneeshvyas wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length.
a + b + c =180°
(1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° --> a + c =120° --> b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient.
(2) a = 2b − c --> a + c =2b --> 2b + b = 180° --> b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient.
Answer: E.
Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions....
Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question.
I am sorry but I seem to miss something here.....to identify a triangle as an isosceles one, we either need to prove two sides equal or the opposite angles equal.....if yes then we do need the measure of individual angles
If we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D, because from a + c =120° (b = 60°) we cannot have only two angles equal to each other, so the answer is NO the triangle is NOT isosceles.
_________________
Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2014, 12:30
Bunuel wrote:
If we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D, because from a + c =120° (b = 60°) we cannot have only two angles equal to each other, so the answer is NO the triangle is NOT isosceles.
Right: The possibilities are either that 1) all the angles are 60 degrees, in which case the triangle is equilateral (which, according to the GMAT is also isosceles), or 2) all the angles are different, which is definitely not isosceles. With the GMAT definition, the OA should be E, but if we use the definition that isosceles triangles have EXACTLY TWO congruent sides, then either answer is sufficient to say NO.
close
71% (01:43) correct 
