GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 06:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 78
Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 06 Oct 2019, 23:50
1
2
Question 1
00:00

based on 54 sessions

58% (03:13) correct 42% (02:06) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 54 sessions

65% (01:14) correct 35% (01:21) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 52 sessions

50% (01:57) correct 50% (01:40) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 51 sessions

88% (00:42) correct 13% (01:23) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

based on 53 sessions

77% (00:53) correct 23% (00:47) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

based on 50 sessions

82% (00:54) correct 18% (01:25) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

based on 49 sessions

92% (00:38) correct 8% (00:49) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00

based on 49 sessions

62% (01:09) correct 38% (01:07) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of
manufacturing efficiency in the world automobile
industry. Some observers of Japan have assumed that
Japanese firms use the same manufacturing equipment
(5) and techniques as United States firms but have bene-
fited from the unique characteristics of Japanese
employees and the Japanese culture. However, if this
were true, then one would expect Japanese auto plants
in the United States to perform no better than factories
(10) run by United States companies. This is not the case,
Japanese-run automobile plants located in the United
States and staffed by local workers have demonstrated
higher levels of productivity when compared with facto-
ries owned by United States companies.

(15) Other observers link high Japanese productivity to
higher levels of capital investment per worker. But a
historical perspective leads to a different conclusion.
When the two top Japanese automobile makers
matched and then doubled United States productivity
(20) levels in the mid-sixties, capital investment per
employee was comparable to that of United States
firms. Furthermore, by the late seventies, the amount of
fixed assets required to produce one vehicle was
roughly equivalent in Japan and in the United States.
(25) Since capital investment was not higher in Japan, it had
to be other factors that led to higher productivity.

A more fruitful explanation may lie with Japanese
production techniques. Japanese automobile producers
did not simply implement conventional processes more
(30) effectively: they made critical changes in United States
procedures. For instance, the mass-production philos-
ophy of United States automakers encouraged the
production of huge lots of cars in order to utilize fully
expensive, component-specific equipment and to
(35) occupy fully workers who have been trained to execute
one operation efficiently. Japanese automakers chose to
make small-lot production feasible by introducing
several departures from United States practices,
including the use of flexible equipment that could be
(40) altered easily to do several different production tasks
and the training of workers in multiple jobs.
Automakers could schedule the production of different
components or models on single machines, thereby
eliminating the need to store the buffer stocks of extra
(45) components that result when specialized equipment
and workers are kept constantly active.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) present the major steps of a process
(B) clarify an ambiguity
(C) chronicle a dispute
(D) correct misconceptions
(E) defend an accepted approach

2. The author suggests that if the observers of Japan mentioned in line 3 were correct, which of the following would be the case?

(A) The equipment used in Japanese automobile plants would be different from the equipment used in United States plants.
(B) Japanese workers would be trained to do several different production jobs.
(C) Culture would not have an influence on the productivity levels of workers.
(D) The workers in Japanese-run plants would have higher productivity levels regardless of where they were located.
(E) The production levels of Japanese-run plants located in the United States would be equal to those of plants run by United States companies.

3. Which of the following statements concerning the productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from the passage?

(A) Prior to the 1960’s, the productivity levels of the top Japanese automakers were exceeded by those of United States automakers.

(B) The culture of a country has a large effect on the productivity levels of its automakers.

(C) During the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, productivity levels were comparable in Japan and the United States.

(D) The greater the number of cars that are produced in a single lot, the higher a plant’s productivity level.

(E) The amount of capital investment made by automobile manufacturers in their factories determines the level of productivity.

4. According to the passage, which of the following statements is true of Japanese automobile workers?

(A) Their productivity levels did not equal those of United States automobile workers until the late seventies.
(B) Their high efficiency levels are a direct result of cultural influences.
(C) They operate component-specific machinery.
(D) They are trained to do more than one job.
(E) They produce larger lots of cars than do workers in United States factories.

5. Which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph?

(A) A thesis is presented and supporting examples are provided.
(B) Opposing views are presented, classified, and then reconciled.
(C) A fact is stated, and an explanation is advanced and then refuted.
(D) A theory is proposed, considered, and then amended.
(E) An opinion is presented, qualified, and then reaffirmed.

6. It can be inferred from the passage that one problem associated with the production of huge lots of cars is which of the following?

(A) The need to manufacture flexible machinery and equipment
(B) The need to store extra components not required for immediate use
(C) The need for expensive training programs for workers, which emphasize the development of facility in several production jobs
(D) The need to alter conventional mass-production processes
(E) The need to increase the investment per vehicle in order to achieve high productivity levels

7. Which of the following statements is supported by information stated in the passage?

(A) Japanese and United States automakers differ in their approach to production processes.
(B) Japanese automakers have perfected the use of single-function equipment.
(C) Japanese automakers invest more capital per employee than do United States automakers.
(D) United States-owned factories abroad have higher production levels than do Japanese owned plants in the United States.
(E) Japanese automakers have benefited from the cultural heritage of their workers.

8. With which of the following predictive statement regarding Japanese automakers would the author most likely agree?

(A) The efficiency levels of the Japanese automakers will decline if they become less flexible in their approach to production.
(B) Japanese automakers productivity levels double during the late 1990’s.
(C) United States automakers will originate new production processes before Japanese automakers do.
(D) Japanese automakers will hire fewer workers than will United States automakers because each worker is required to perform several jobs.
(E) Japanese automakers will spend less on equipment repairs than will United States automakers because Japanese equipment can be easily altered.

Originally posted by OptimusPrimea1 on 19 Sep 2011, 00:06.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 06 Oct 2019, 23:50, edited 3 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (838).
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 13
Location: India
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2011, 02:31
1,

Nothing is clarified here and I don't think we can call this ambiguity, whereas 2 misconceptions are corrected
So opted for D

4,

"Japanese automakers chose to make small-lot production feasible by introducing several departures from United States practices, including the use of flexible equipment that could be (40) altered easily to do several different production tasks and the training of workers in multiple jobs."

The above sentence shows that Japanese automobile workers are trained to do more than one job

"For instance, the mass-production philosophy of United States automakers encouraged the production of huge lots of cars in order to utilize fully expensive, component-specific equipment and to (35) occupy fully workers who have been trained to execute one operation efficiently."

This shows that component-specific equipment is associated with United States automakers and not Japanese automakers

3,

"When the two top Japanese automobile makers matched and then doubled United States productivity (20) levels in the mid-sixties...."

Dunno how I missed this
_________________
Regards,
Archana
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2011, 08:32
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) present the major steps of a process
(B) clarify an ambiguity
(C) chronicle a dispute
(D) correct misconceptions (Correct, it was a misconception that Japanese car makers are better because of the cultural advantage. Author proved it wrong)
(E) defend an accepted approach

2. The author suggests that if the observers of Japan
mentioned in line 3 were correct, which of the following
would be the case?
(A) The equipment used in Japanese automobile plants
would be different from the equipment used in
United States plants.
(B) Japanese workers would be trained to do several
different production jobs.
(C) Culture would not have an influence on the
productivity levels of workers.
(D) The workers in Japanese-run plants would have
higher productivity levels regardless of where they
were located. (Correct,"Some observers of Japan have assumed that
Japanese firms use the same manufacturing equipment
and techniques as United States firms but have bene-
fited from the unique characteristics of Japanese
employees and the Japanese culture"---so it they were right then D would be right)

(E) The production levels of Japanese-run plants located
in the United States would be equal to those of
plants run by United States companies.

3. Which of the following statements concerning the
productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from
the passage?
(A) Prior to the 1960’s, the productivity levels of the top
Japanese automakers were exceeded by those of
United States automakers. (Correct, "When the two top Japanese automobile makers matched and then doubled United States productivity
(20) levels in the mid-sixties"----- that means Japanese were lower in productivity in 60 than US Car maker)

(B) The culture of a country has a large effect on the
productivity levels of its automakers.
(C) During the late 1970’s and early 1980’s,
productivity levels were comparable in Japan and
the United States.
(D) The greater the number of cars that are produced in
a single lot, the higher a plant’s productivity level.
(E) The amount of capital investment made by
automobile manufacturers in their factories
determines the level of productivity.

4. According to the passage, which of the following
statements is true of Japanese automobile workers?
(A) Their productivity levels did not equal those of
United States automobile workers until the late
seventies.
(B) Their high efficiency levels are a direct result of
cultural influences.
(C) They operate component-specific machinery.
(D) They are trained to do more than one job. (Correct," Japanese automakers chose to make small-lot production feasible by introducing several departures from United States practices, including the use of flexible equipment that could be (40) altered easily to do several different production tasks and the training of workers in multiple jobs."-----Means worker are able to do several jobs)
(E) They produce larger lots of cars than do workers in
United States factories.

5. Which of the following best describes the organization
of the first paragraph?
(A) A thesis is presented and supporting examples are
provided.
(B) Opposing views are presented, classified, and then
reconciled. I will go with this
(C) A fact is stated, and an explanation is advanced and
then refuted.
(D) A theory is proposed, considered, and then
amended.
(E) An opinion is presented, qualified, and then
reaffirmed.

Manager
Status: A mind once opened never loses..!
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 189
Location: India
MISSION : 800
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2015, 00:03
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) present the major steps of a process
(B) clarify an ambiguity
(C) Chronicle a dispute
(D) correct misconceptions
(E) defend an accepted approach

2. The author suggests that if the observers of Japan mentioned in line 3 were correct, which of the following would be the case?
(A) The equipment used in Japanese automobile plants would be different from the equipment used in United States plants.
(B) Japanese workers would be trained to do several different production jobs.
(C) Culture would not have an influence on the productivity levels of workers.
(D) The workers in Japanese-run plants would have higher productivity levels regardless of where they were located.
(E) The production levels of Japanese-run plants located in the United States would be equal to those of plants run by United States companies.

3. Which of the following statements concerning the productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from the passage?
(A) Prior to the 1960’s, the productivity levels of the top Japanese automakers were exceeded by those of United States automakers.
(B) The culture of a country has a large effect on the productivity levels of its automakers.
(C) During the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, productivity levels were comparable in Japan and the United States.
(D) The greater the number of cars that are produced in a single lot, the higher a plant’s productivity level.
(E) The amount of capital investment made by automobile manufacturers in their factories determines the level of productivity.

4. According to the passage, which of the following statements is true of Japanese automobile workers?
(A) Their productivity levels did not equal those of United States automobile workers until the late seventies.
(B) Their high efficiency levels are a direct result of cultural influences.
(C) They operate component-specific machinery.
(D) They are trained to do more than one job.
(E) They produce larger lots of cars than do workers in United States factories.

5. Which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph?
(A) A thesis is presented and supporting examples are provided.
(B) Opposing views are presented, classified, and then reconciled.
(C) A fact is stated, and an explanation is advanced and then refuted.
(D) A theory is proposed, considered, and then amended.
(E) An opinion is presented, qualified, and then reaffirmed.

6. It can be inferred from the passage that one problem associated with the production of huge lots of cars is which of the following?
(A) The need to manufacture flexible machinery and equipment
(B) The need to store extra components not required for immediate use
(C) The need for expensive training programs for workers, which emphasize the development of facility in several production jobs
(D) The need to alter conventional mass-production processes
(E) The need to increase the investment per vehicle in order to achieve high productivity levels

7. Which of the following statements is supported by information stated in the passage?
(A) Japanese and United States automakers differ in their approach to production processes.
(B) Japanese automakers have perfected the use of single-function equipment.
(C) Japanese automakers invest more capital per employee than do United States automakers.
(D) United States-owned factories abroad have higher production levels than do Japanese owned plants in the United States.
(E) Japanese automakers have benefited from the cultural heritage of their workers.

8. With which of the following predictive statement regarding Japanese automakers would the author most likely agree?
(A) The efficiency levels of the Japanese automakers will decline if they become less flexible in their approach to production.
(B) Japanese automakers productivity levels double during the late 1990’s.
(C) United States automakers will originate new production processes before Japanese automakers do.
(D) Japanese automakers will hire fewer workers than will United States automakers because each worker is required to perform several jobs.
(E) Japanese automakers will spend less on equipment repairs than will United States automakers because Japanese equipment can be easily altered
Attachments

ans.docx [12.77 KiB]

_________________
Thank you

+KUDOS

> I CAN, I WILL <
Retired Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1333
Location: Viet Nam
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 05:33
_________________
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 21:58
broall wrote:

hi Broall,
can u kindly explain the answer to question no-3. We know that in the mid sixties, the production level of japanese farms doubled. But, prior to 1960's we have no information whether the production level of japanese farms exceed or was equal to american farms. Kindly help
Retired Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1333
Location: Viet Nam
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2017, 22:11
1
sunny91 wrote:
broall wrote:

hi Broall,
can u kindly explain the answer to question no-3. We know that in the mid sixties, the production level of japanese farms doubled. But, prior to 1960's we have no information whether the production level of japanese farms exceed or was equal to american farms. Kindly help

That's the trick of this question. The information is in here

Quote:
When the two top Japanese automobile makers matched and then doubled United States productivity levels in the mid-sixties, capital investment per employee was comparable to that of United States firms.

The sentence means that in the mid-sixties, the two top Japanese companies matched the United States companies in productivity levels. After that, the two top Japanese companies doubled the United States companies in productivity levels. This is a continuous trend.

Thus, we cound infer that before the mid-sixties, or early sixties, the productivity level in Japanese companies were lower than that in United States companies.
_________________
Re: Japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of manufacturing effic   [#permalink] 18 Nov 2017, 22:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by