Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 23:26 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 23:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
810,897
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,868
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,897
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
alexjsfk
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 19 Apr 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
43
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Romania
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 3.84
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
Posts: 39
Kudos: 43
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ArunSharma12
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 512
Own Kudos:
1,037
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 512
Kudos: 1,037
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
800Dreamer
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 04 Feb 2024
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
187
 [1]
Given Kudos: 186
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
Posts: 188
Kudos: 187
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) changes in the traffic light patterns could mitigate the effect of the development : We are we talking about mitigation : Clearly out of scope

(B) the traffic at the time of day Daria sits at the coffee shop represents a typical level : Okay fine.

(C) residents of apartment complexes usually own at least one car per apartment : Even if they dont doesnt impact the reasoning.

(D) Jonathan's understanding of the impact of fumes and congestion on the quality of life downtown is reasonably accurate : We are not concerned about Jonathan.

(E) large numbers are useful talking points for political opponents of development because : Out of scope.
they are easily misinterpreted

Only viable option is (B)
User avatar
Sushil117
Joined: 04 Mar 2020
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
297
 [1]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
GPA: 3.3
Posts: 248
Kudos: 297
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jonathan: Have you heard about this new proposed development project? They want to build a 950-unit apartment complex along the waterfront. That means that over 1,000 additional
vehicles will be passing through the main downtown intersection each day, which will increase fumes and congestion to unacceptable levels.

Daria: Is that really such a large increase? When I'm sitting at the downtown coffee shop, I see at least 50 vehicles go through that intersection every time the light changes. Assuming
the light changes every three minutes, that's 1,000 vehicles passing through every hour.

Daria's argument relies on the assumption that


(A) changes in the traffic light patterns could mitigate the effect of the development
-incorrect as it has no relation with development

(B) the traffic at the time of day Daria sits at the coffee shop represents a typical level
Correct- it represents the the assumption that daria holds the average traffic passing as the sample of whole traffic

(C) residents of apartment complexes usually own at least one car per apartment
incorrect -Irrelevant as nothing is provided like that

(D) Jonathan's understanding of the impact of fumes and congestion on the quality of life downtown is reasonably accurate
- irrelevant to asked question

(E) large numbers are useful talking points for political opponents of development because
they are easily misinterpreted
-Irrelevant
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Jonathan: Have you heard about this new proposed development project? They want to build a 950-unit apartment complex along the waterfront. That means that over 1,000 additional vehicles will be passing through the main downtown intersection each day, which will increase fumes and congestion to unacceptable levels.

Daria: Is that really such a large increase? When I'm sitting at the downtown coffee shop, I see at least 50 vehicles go through that intersection every time the light changes. Assuming the light changes every three minutes, that's 1,000 vehicles passing through every hour.

In my opinion, the conclusion is that 1000 cars per hour are represented in this intersection instead of 1000 cars per day.

So the Pre thinking process is this change of pattern of Daria is the normal pattern throughout the day.

Process of Eliminate:
Quote:
(A) changes in the traffic light patterns could mitigate the effect of the development
Out of scope.

Quote:
(B) the traffic at the time of day Daria sits at the coffee shop represents a typical level
Look good, Keep it.

Quote:
(C) residents of apartment complexes usually own at least one car per apartment
Not related

Quote:
(D) Jonathan's understanding of the impact of fumes and congestion on the quality of life downtown is reasonably accurate
Nearly but it isn't the conclusion.

Quote:
(E) large numbers are useful talking points for political opponents of development because they are easily misinterpreted

Out of scope.

Hope it correct and help.
avatar
Danis73
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is B, Because if we negate this answer choice then the argument breaks down.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,868
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,897
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Competition Mode Question



Jonathan: Have you heard about this new proposed development project? They want to build a 950-unit apartment complex along the waterfront. That means that over 1,000 additional
vehicles will be passing through the main downtown intersection each day, which will increase fumes and congestion to unacceptable levels.

Daria: Is that really such a large increase? When I'm sitting at the downtown coffee shop, I see at least 50 vehicles go through that intersection every time the light changes. Assuming
the light changes every three minutes, that's 1,000 vehicles passing through every hour.

Daria's argument relies on the assumption that


(A) changes in the traffic light patterns could mitigate the effect of the development

(B) the traffic at the time of day Daria sits at the coffee shop represents a typical level

(C) residents of apartment complexes usually own at least one car per apartment

(D) Jonathan's understanding of the impact of fumes and congestion on the quality of life downtown is reasonably accurate

(E) large numbers are useful talking points for political opponents of development because they are easily misinterpreted

Official Explanation



Answer: B

This is an assumption question. Jonathan points out an increase in traffic through a major intersection and complains about a likely increase in fumes and congestion. Daria's response, though it isn't stated explicitly, is that 1,000 vehicles per day isn't that much of an increase. Her evidence: She sees enough vehicles go through the intersection to suggest that 1,000 is a typical hour. The underlying assumption is that her experience is, in fact, typical--that 1,000 cars usually go through the intersection per hour. That may suggest that the increase in congestion and fumes is slight, on a percent increase basis.

(A) Daria isn't considering the pattern of the traffic light, just the vehicle volume.

(B) This is correct.
This is her assumption – that 50 vehicles per three minutes is typical. If it is, she's right to question Jonathan's concern. If it is unusually high, her argument is weak.

(C) This is something like an assumption of Jonathan's argument, not of Daria's.

(D) Daria is questioning Jonathan's assessment, not agreeing with it, as this choice would suggest.

(E) This is far outside of the scope, which is specific to the number of cars passing through the intersection over various periods of time.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts