GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Apr 2019, 21:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 119
Location: Banaglore
Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 06:51
1
3
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:59) correct 40% (02:13) wrong based on 319 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the ancients lined up the pyramids with two stars whose alignment was only true around 4,500 years ago,which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start of construction of Khufu's Great Pyramid at Giza to around the year 2467 BC.

A) which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start

B) which makes it impossible to stick to the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, which was plus or minus 100 years in favor of one which is only five years, pinpointing the probable start

C) suggesting that the margin of error for the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt is no longer plus or minus 100 years, but rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing the probable start

D) making improvements in the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start

Source: 800score.com
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 137
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 09:19
4
= E

Option A and B has modifier "Which". which modifies the noun just before "which". Hence in this case which is modifying "4500 years ago" hence wrong

In Option C "margin of error for the archaeological chronology " is wrongly worded .... instead of for there must be "in"
Also, "rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing".....which is modifying five years, that is sense less

Option D is changing the meaning of the original sentence. According to the sentence it is possible to improve the margin in chronology, .... possible but not definite
by removing the word POSSIBLE in option D ..it suggests that it definite to improve .... hence alter intent and wrong

Option E .... both the clauses are starting with -ing ..hence correctly modifying previous clause .... correct FROM X TO Y idiom ....also shows possibility of the event ....hence correct.
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 148
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 20:20
I wonder what is the source. I was lost half way reading the question, let alone making a grammatically correct choice.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 268
Location: India
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 20:56
E. was confused between C & E . eliminated all the others because which after 4500yrs was not appropriate (reasons stated in previous posts). In C again the usage of which was not appropriate. As a general rule which must modify the noun immediately preceding it and the whole clause.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 268
Location: India
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 20:57
must say was a long question stem, took an insane 4.5mins to mark my ans!
Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 135
Location: New Delhi, India
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2012, 05:20
vyassaptarashi wrote:
= E

Option A and B has modifier "Which". which modifies the noun just before "which". Hence in this case which is modifying "4500 years ago" hence wrong

In Option C "margin of error for the archaeological chronology " is wrongly worded .... instead of for there must be "in"
Also, "rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing".....which is modifying five years, that is sense less

Option D is changing the meaning of the original sentence. According to the sentence it is possible to improve the margin in chronology, .... possible but not definite
by removing the word POSSIBLE in option D ..it suggests that it definite to improve .... hence alter intent and wrong

Option E .... both the clauses are starting with -ing ..hence correctly modifying previous clause .... correct FROM X TO Y idiom ....also shows possibility of the event ....hence correct.

Thanks Nice explanation.. really helps
_________________
Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 24
Location: India
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2012, 21:12
Nice explanation...
could eliminate easily a,b ...took time for c and guessed with e.....

vyassaptarashi wrote:
= E

Option A and B has modifier "Which". which modifies the noun just before "which". Hence in this case which is modifying "4500 years ago" hence wrong

In Option C "margin of error for the archaeological chronology " is wrongly worded .... instead of for there must be "in"
Also, "rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing".....which is modifying five years, that is sense less

Option D is changing the meaning of the original sentence. According to the sentence it is possible to improve the margin in chronology, .... possible but not definite
by removing the word POSSIBLE in option D ..it suggests that it definite to improve .... hence alter intent and wrong

Option E .... both the clauses are starting with -ing ..hence correctly modifying previous clause .... correct FROM X TO Y idiom ....also shows possibility of the event ....hence correct.

_________________
Kudos if you like the post!!!
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 102
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2012, 09:01
Got confused between C and E. Finally eliminated C because of the present tense present.
_________________
FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!
Intern
Status: Trying to crack GMAT
Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 29
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT Date: 07-11-2012
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2012, 10:13
Wow, this one was pretty long.

Drilled it down to C and E. Then just gave up at 2 min and selected C.

I understood the explanation mentioned above. But, can't we just simply say that using the word "suggesting" changed the meaning of the sentence and hence, we should discard C?

Edit: Sorry, my bad. devpanda already said that. This question really exhausted me
_________________
“When I was young I observed that nine out of ten things I did were failures, so I did ten times more work.” ~ Bernard Shaw

Kudos me if I helped you in any way.
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 92
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2012, 01:31
1
I get confused with the options when option mentions .. "it"..what does it refer to in statement E?
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 196
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2012, 03:19
+1 for E.

"Which" cannot entire modify clauses. But present particles aka Verb-ing can.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________
+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.
Senior Manager
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 425
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2012, 06:37
+1 for (E)
The original sentence is incorrect because WHICH after 4500 YEARS is not modifying the STUDY.
POE works,(C) has ...BUT RATHER.. which looked awkward.
(D)vs(E), WHICH in the second sentence is the determining factors, so (E) wins.
_________________
" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 76
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2012, 05:27
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?
_________________
if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 478
Schools: Johnson '16 (M)
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V40
WE: Asset Management (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2012, 05:42
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Long sentences can be challenging. One trick to help eliminate answers is to go through the possible answers noting the differences (splits). This will help you eliminate a few of the answers, leaving (usually) 2 or 3 potential solutions.

Check out this post from MGMAT's blog: http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... n-problem/
_________________
My Applicant Blog: http://hamm0.wordpress.com/
Senior Manager
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 425
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2012, 05:43
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Break them into fragments, look for SV pairs, Modifiers, check out ICs. etc... e-gmat methods will suit you.
_________________
" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 196
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2012, 07:47
thevenus wrote:
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Break them into fragments, look for SV pairs, Modifiers, check out ICs. etc... e-gmat methods will suit you.

I agree! The longer sentences are, the better the odds of finding something (grammar, syntax, modifier) wrong with them. I say, the longer they come, the more easily they fall...
_________________
+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.
Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 23
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15, NUS '16
GMAT Date: 08-27-2013
GPA: 3.46
WE: Project Management (Other)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2013, 08:34
Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the ancients lined up the pyramids with two stars whose alignment was only true around 4,500 years ago,which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start of construction of Khufu's Great Pyramid at Giza to around the year 2467 BC.

A) which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start First "which" modifying 4500 years instead of alignment

B) which makes it impossible to stick to the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, which was plus or minus 100 years in favor of one which is only five years, pinpointing the probable start same error as "A" and distorted meaning

C) suggesting that the margin of error for the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt is no longer plus or minus 100 years, but rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing the probable start usage of rather is wrong it should be "rather than" and tense "suggesting" is incorrect it should be suggested

D) making improvements in the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start "making improvements " wrongly suggesting that that study itself making improvements which distorts the meaning of the sentence

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start clarity in meaning and parallelism in maintained

_________________
.........................................................................................
Please give me kudos if my posts help.
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2017, 01:11
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 256
Location: India
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2017, 01:43
katelyntanglu wrote:
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

hey , happy to respond

see first thing you when you comma+and then the sentence must be IC after comma+and ,means you can only join two ICs with comma+and , so there will be not and before 2nd modifier .

hope its clear . hit kudos if you liked it .
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2017, 02:17
nks2611 wrote:
katelyntanglu wrote:
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

hey , happy to respond

see first thing you when you comma+and then the sentence must be IC after comma+and ,means you can only join two ICs with comma+and , so there will be not and before 2nd modifier .

hope its clear . hit kudos if you liked it .

Ummmm, yep, these two sentences starting with "ing" are both IC and they are both modifying the main clause, and that's why I think we need a "AND" here.

Hope I don't miss sth. And I still dont understand why E is correct. Can someone explain it?
Thx.
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the   [#permalink] 29 Jul 2017, 02:17

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by