Last visit was: 12 Jul 2024, 19:50 It is currently 12 Jul 2024, 19:50
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 296 [7]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Banaglore
Q49  V29 GMAT 2: 700  Q49  V35
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 102
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [5]
Given Kudos: 10
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Status:Bunuel's fan!
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
Concentration: Non-profit
Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 215
Own Kudos [?]: 781 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
E. was confused between C & E . eliminated all the others because which after 4500yrs was not appropriate (reasons stated in previous posts). In C again the usage of which was not appropriate. As a general rule which must modify the noun immediately preceding it and the whole clause.
Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 215
Own Kudos [?]: 781 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
must say was a long question stem, took an insane 4.5mins to mark my ans!
Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 155 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: New Delhi, India
Concentration: Marketing
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
vyassaptarashi wrote:
= E

Option A and B has modifier "Which". which modifies the noun just before "which". Hence in this case which is modifying "4500 years ago" hence wrong

In Option C "margin of error for the archaeological chronology " is wrongly worded .... instead of for there must be "in"
Also, "rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing".....which is modifying five years, that is sense less

Option D is changing the meaning of the original sentence. According to the sentence it is possible to improve the margin in chronology, .... possible but not definite
by removing the word POSSIBLE in option D ..it suggests that it definite to improve .... hence alter intent and wrong

Option E .... both the clauses are starting with -ing ..hence correctly modifying previous clause .... correct FROM X TO Y idiom ....also shows possibility of the event ....hence correct.

Thanks Nice explanation.. really helps
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
Nice explanation...
could eliminate easily a,b ...took time for c and guessed with e.....

vyassaptarashi wrote:
= E

Option A and B has modifier "Which". which modifies the noun just before "which". Hence in this case which is modifying "4500 years ago" hence wrong

In Option C "margin of error for the archaeological chronology " is wrongly worded .... instead of for there must be "in"
Also, "rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing".....which is modifying five years, that is sense less

Option D is changing the meaning of the original sentence. According to the sentence it is possible to improve the margin in chronology, .... possible but not definite
by removing the word POSSIBLE in option D ..it suggests that it definite to improve .... hence alter intent and wrong

Option E .... both the clauses are starting with -ing ..hence correctly modifying previous clause .... correct FROM X TO Y idiom ....also shows possibility of the event ....hence correct.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 105 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE:Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
Got confused between C and E. Finally eliminated C because of the present tense present.
Intern
Joined: 17 May 2012
Status:Trying to crack GMAT
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT Date: 07-11-2012
GPA: 3.82
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
Wow, this one was pretty long.

Drilled it down to C and E. Then just gave up at 2 min and selected C.

I understood the explanation mentioned above. But, can't we just simply say that using the word "suggesting" changed the meaning of the sentence and hence, we should discard C?

Edit: Sorry, my bad. devpanda already said that. This question really exhausted me
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 139 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
I get confused with the options when option mentions .. "it"..what does it refer to in statement E?
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
+1 for E.

"Which" cannot entire modify clauses. But present particles aka Verb-ing can.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Status:Final Countdown
Posts: 319
Own Kudos [?]: 1329 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE:Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
+1 for (E)
The original sentence is incorrect because WHICH after 4500 YEARS is not modifying the STUDY.
POE works,(C) has ...BUT RATHER.. which looked awkward.
(D)vs(E), WHICH in the second sentence is the determining factors, so (E) wins.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 385 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 278 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V40
WE:Asset Management (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Long sentences can be challenging. One trick to help eliminate answers is to go through the possible answers noting the differences (splits). This will help you eliminate a few of the answers, leaving (usually) 2 or 3 potential solutions.

Check out this post from MGMAT's blog: https://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... n-problem/
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Status:Final Countdown
Posts: 319
Own Kudos [?]: 1329 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE:Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Break them into fragments, look for SV pairs, Modifiers, check out ICs. etc... e-gmat methods will suit you.
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
thevenus wrote:
I have seen lots of such long SC questions appearing in Real GMAT exam and they are
1) really very time consuming
2) difficult to interpret the meaning
3) force to re-read the original sentence (with different options) again and again.

Is there a quick way/Trick to solve such long questions ?

Break them into fragments, look for SV pairs, Modifiers, check out ICs. etc... e-gmat methods will suit you.

I agree! The longer sentences are, the better the odds of finding something (grammar, syntax, modifier) wrong with them. I say, the longer they come, the more easily they fall...
Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 68 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 NUS '16
GMAT Date: 08-27-2013
GPA: 3.46
WE:Project Management (Other)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the ancients lined up the pyramids with two stars whose alignment was only true around 4,500 years ago,which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start of construction of Khufu's Great Pyramid at Giza to around the year 2467 BC.

A) which makes it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, which makes it possible to pinpoint what people probably think was the start First "which" modifying 4500 years instead of alignment

B) which makes it impossible to stick to the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, which was plus or minus 100 years in favor of one which is only five years, pinpointing the probable start same error as "A" and distorted meaning

C) suggesting that the margin of error for the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt is no longer plus or minus 100 years, but rather only five years, which suggests the possibility of pinpointing the probable start usage of rather is wrong it should be "rather than" and tense "suggesting" is incorrect it should be suggested

D) making improvements in the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start "making improvements " wrongly suggesting that that study itself making improvements which distorts the meaning of the sentence

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, pinpointing the probable start clarity in meaning and parallelism in maintained

Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 196
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE:Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
katelyntanglu wrote:
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

hey , happy to respond

see first thing you when you comma+and then the sentence must be IC after comma+and ,means you can only join two ICs with comma+and , so there will be not and before 2nd modifier .

hope its clear . hit kudos if you liked it .
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
nks2611 wrote:
katelyntanglu wrote:
Can someone please provide the SOURCE or a screenshot of the question?

E) making it possible to improve the margin of error in the archaeological chronology of ancient Egypt, from plus or minus 100 years to only five years, (AND?) pinpointing the probable start

I don't quite understand why there is no AND between these two "comma +doing" sentences?
Is that allowed in Gmat exam?

hey , happy to respond

see first thing you when you comma+and then the sentence must be IC after comma+and ,means you can only join two ICs with comma+and , so there will be not and before 2nd modifier .

hope its clear . hit kudos if you liked it .

Ummmm, yep, these two sentences starting with "ing" are both IC and they are both modifying the main clause, and that's why I think we need a "AND" here.

Hope I don't miss sth. And I still dont understand why E is correct. Can someone explain it?
Thx.
Re: Kate San's study, published in Nature, shows that the [#permalink]
1   2
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6979 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts