GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Feb 2019, 03:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Valentine's day SALE is on! 25% off.

February 18, 2019

February 18, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

We don’t care what your relationship status this year - we love you just the way you are. AND we want you to crush the GMAT!
• ### Get FREE Daily Quiz for 2 months

February 18, 2019

February 18, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Buy "All-In-One Standard (\$149)", get free Daily quiz (2 mon). Coupon code : SPECIAL

# M16-12

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52921

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 23:58
1
22
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

36% (01:43) correct 64% (02:08) wrong based on 100 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If a price was increased by $$x$$% and then decreased by $$y$$%, is the new price higher than the original?

(1) $$x \gt y$$

(2) $$x = 1.2y$$

_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52921

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 23:58
2
4
Official Solution:

Let $$P$$ denote the original price.

Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If $$x$$ is much larger than $$y$$, the new price is higher than the original. But if $$x$$ is only marginally larger, the new price is lower. For example, if $$x = 20$$ and $$y = 19$$, the new price is $$P*1.2*0.81 \lt P$$.

Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Use the same reasoning. If $$y$$ is large, the new price is small (if $$y = 100$$, the new price is 0). If $$y$$ is small, the new price is higher than the original (if $$y = 10$$, the new price is $$P*1.12*0.9 = P*1.008 \gt P$$).

Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S1 to S2 provides no new information.

_________________
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2013
Posts: 134
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2015, 06:44
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:

Let $$P$$ denote the original price.

Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If $$x$$ is much larger than $$y$$, the new price is higher than the original. But if $$x$$ is only marginally larger, the new price is lower. For example, if $$x = 20$$ and $$y = 19$$, the new price is $$P*1.2*0.81 \lt P$$.

Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Use the same reasoning. If $$y$$ is large, the new price is small (if $$y = 100$$, the new price is 0). If $$y$$ is small, the new price is higher than the original (if $$y = 10$$, the new price is $$P*1.12*0.9 = P*1.008 \gt P$$).

Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S1 to S2 provides no new information.

Hi Bunuel !

if x is only marginally larger, the new price is lower.
This doesn't hold true for x= 12 and y= 10

100 incr by 12% = 112, then decr by 10% = 112-11.2 = 100.8 (greater than 100)

Regards,
SR
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q51 V28

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2015, 15:25
Well E is correct.

Lets assume principal is P

P(1+x/100)(1-y/100) is the final price.

Now if we have x=1.2y

P(1+x/100)(1-x/120)
To find out if this will be <P

P(1+x/100)(1-x/120)<P

or (100+x)(120-x)<120*100
or 20x-x^2< 0

or x>20

So lets take Y = 30
X =42

So 100 becomes 142 and multiply 142 by 0.7 =99.4

So X=12, Y =10.. The final value is greater than P
but in X =42, Y=30.. the final value is less than P
Intern
Status: Mr
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V46

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2016, 06:06
lastminutemba 1.2x/100 is not equal to x/120
Current Student
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 187
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.88
WE: Business Development (Hospitality and Tourism)

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2016, 07:26
Hi! Is it fair to say that we can never know if the original price will be higher or lower when given only the percents?
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2016
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2016, 05:46
There is not enough information to say/answer the question since we don't know x>y or x<y
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2015
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2016, 17:34
lastminutemba
As per (2) x=1.2y, If y=30 then x=36 not 42, so P becomes 136 and then 95.2.
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2016, 11:37
1
Bunuel wrote:
If a price was increased by $$x$$% and then decreased by $$y$$%, is the new price higher than the original?

(1) $$x \gt y$$

(2) $$x = 1.2y$$

Lets assume that New price is higher than the old price and see if it always holds true.

$$P*\frac{100+X}{100}*\frac{100-Y}{100} - P > 0$$

Solving, 100*(X-Y) > XY

1. Given, $$x \gt y$$
Now when X is infinitesimally larger then y , then L.H.S of the equality tends to 0 and RHS is X squared or Y squared, which can be large depending on the value of the X
When X is much larger than Y, say X = 100000, Y = 0.0001, then LHS is much larger then RHS
Hence the inequality flips sign based on the values of X and Y so not sufficient.

2. Putting $$x = 1.2y$$ in our derived inequality
20> 1.2 Y
hence again whether this always holds true will depend on the value of Y. Not sufficient.

The condition given in point 2 also satisfies point 1 hence together also they are not sufficient.
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Posts: 7

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2017, 08:48
LanDrobnack
IMO it's not correct to say that one cannot determine whether the new price will be higher/lower than the original price if no percents are given.
If the percent change is given one should always be able to determine the relationship between the two prices; the thing is that in this case you are only given the relationship between the two percent changes!
Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 6

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2017, 10:50
Hi. New to the forum.

I think I must be doing something wrong but I cannot seem to find the answer choices anywhere. For the verbal question of the day the answers were displayed underneath the question but they seem to be absent in this case. What am I missing?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52921

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2017, 10:54
1
brettbrettbrettcom wrote:
Hi. New to the forum.

I think I must be doing something wrong but I cannot seem to find the answer choices anywhere. For the verbal question of the day the answers were displayed underneath the question but they seem to be absent in this case. What am I missing?

This is a data sufficiency question. Options for DS questions are always the same.

The data sufficiency problem consists of a question and two statements, labeled (1) and (2), in which certain data are given. You have to decide whether the data given in the statements are sufficient for answering the question. Using the data given in the statements, plus your knowledge of mathematics and everyday facts (such as the number of days in July or the meaning of the word counterclockwise), you must indicate whether—

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
C. BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.

I suggest you to go through the following post ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT.

Hope this helps.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 21 May 2018
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2018, 05:22
Great question, almost got tricked into selecting C, but then decided to continue solving and plugging in values to test.

My solution below (a bit too time-consuming for GMAT, but helps me with understanding).
Let P = original price.
New price = P(1+ x/100)(1- y/100) = P(1+ x/100 - y/100 -xy/1000)
Test if (1+ x/100 - y/100 -xy/1000) > 1
x-y- xy/100 > 0
100x - 100y - xy > 0 --- (1)

Statement (1) gives the same information as statement (2), which has more details.

Sub x = 1.2y into (1),
120y - 100y - (1.2y)*y > 0
20y - 1.2y^2 > 0
y (20 - 1.2y) > 0

Since y is a %, it has to be > 0
20 - 1.2y > 0
1.2y < 20
y < 20/1.2 = 16

The new price is only higher for y < 16
Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2016
Posts: 6
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2018, 19:45
Does question stem means that increase and decrease is on original price..? I did mistake as i did increase on original price and then decrease on the new price.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 81
Location: Argentina
Schools: HBS, Stanford, Wharton

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2019, 10:59
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Would you please reelaborate statement 2 pls ? thank you Bunuel
_________________

The HARDER you work, the LUCKIER you get.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52921

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2019, 00:43
patto wrote:
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Would you please reelaborate statement 2 pls ? thank you Bunuel

Check here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-a-price-w ... 88067.html
_________________
Re: M16-12   [#permalink] 10 Feb 2019, 00:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# M16-12

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.