Oct 18 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn an intuitive, systematic approach that will maximize your success on Fillintheblank GMAT CR Questions. Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss!
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Question Stats:
34% (01:41) correct 66% (02:08) wrong based on 109 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If a price was increased by \(x\)% and then decreased by \(y\)%, is the new price higher than the original? (1) \(x \gt y\) (2) \(x = 1.2y\)
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Re M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:58
Official Solution: Let \(P\) denote the original price. Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is much larger than \(y\), the new price is higher than the original. But if \(x\) is only marginally larger, the new price is lower. For example, if \(x = 20\) and \(y = 19\), the new price is \(P*1.2*0.81 \lt P\). Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Use the same reasoning. If \(y\) is large, the new price is small (if \(y = 100\), the new price is 0). If \(y\) is small, the new price is higher than the original (if \(y = 10\), the new price is \(P*1.12*0.9 = P*1.008 \gt P\)). Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S1 to S2 provides no new information. Answer: E
_________________



Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2013
Posts: 130
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2015, 07:44
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Let \(P\) denote the original price. Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is much larger than \(y\), the new price is higher than the original. But if \(x\) is only marginally larger, the new price is lower. For example, if \(x = 20\) and \(y = 19\), the new price is \(P*1.2*0.81 \lt P\). Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. Use the same reasoning. If \(y\) is large, the new price is small (if \(y = 100\), the new price is 0). If \(y\) is small, the new price is higher than the original (if \(y = 10\), the new price is \(P*1.12*0.9 = P*1.008 \gt P\)). Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Adding S1 to S2 provides no new information.
Answer: E Hi Bunuel ! if x is only marginally larger, the new price is lower. This doesn't hold true for x= 12 and y= 10 if we start with 100, 100 incr by 12% = 112, then decr by 10% = 11211.2 = 100.8 (greater than 100) Regards, SR



Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V28 GMAT 2: 660 Q51 V28

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Sep 2015, 16:25
Well E is correct.
Lets assume principal is P
P(1+x/100)(1y/100) is the final price.
Now if we have x=1.2y
P(1+x/100)(1x/120) To find out if this will be <P
P(1+x/100)(1x/120)<P
or (100+x)(120x)<120*100 or 20xx^2< 0
or x>20
So lets take Y = 30 X =42
So 100 becomes 142 and multiply 142 by 0.7 =99.4
So X=12, Y =10.. The final value is greater than P but in X =42, Y=30.. the final value is less than P



Intern
Status: Mr
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40 GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V46
WE: Business Development (Advertising and PR)

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Feb 2016, 07:06
lastminutemba 1.2x/100 is not equal to x/120



Current Student
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 187
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.88
WE: Business Development (Hospitality and Tourism)

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 08:26
Hi! Is it fair to say that we can never know if the original price will be higher or lower when given only the percents?



Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2016
Posts: 1

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2016, 06:46
There is not enough information to say/answer the question since we don't know x>y or x<y



Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2015
Posts: 1

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2016, 18:34
lastminutembaAs per (2) x=1.2y, If y=30 then x=36 not 42, so P becomes 136 and then 95.2.



Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2016
Posts: 36

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Oct 2016, 12:37
Bunuel wrote: If a price was increased by \(x\)% and then decreased by \(y\)%, is the new price higher than the original?
(1) \(x \gt y\)
(2) \(x = 1.2y\) Lets assume that New price is higher than the old price and see if it always holds true. \(P*\frac{100+X}{100}*\frac{100Y}{100}  P > 0\) Solving, 100*(XY) > XY 1. Given, \(x \gt y\) Now when X is infinitesimally larger then y , then L.H.S of the equality tends to 0 and RHS is X squared or Y squared, which can be large depending on the value of the X When X is much larger than Y, say X = 100000, Y = 0.0001, then LHS is much larger then RHS Hence the inequality flips sign based on the values of X and Y so not sufficient. 2. Putting \(x = 1.2y\) in our derived inequality 20> 1.2 Y hence again whether this always holds true will depend on the value of Y. Not sufficient. The condition given in point 2 also satisfies point 1 hence together also they are not sufficient.



Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 7

LanDrobnackIMO it's not correct to say that one cannot determine whether the new price will be higher/lower than the original price if no percents are given. If the percent change is given one should always be able to determine the relationship between the two prices; the thing is that in this case you are only given the relationship between the two percent changes!



Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 6

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Mar 2017, 11:50
Hi. New to the forum.
I think I must be doing something wrong but I cannot seem to find the answer choices anywhere. For the verbal question of the day the answers were displayed underneath the question but they seem to be absent in this case. What am I missing?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Mar 2017, 11:54
brettbrettbrettcom wrote: Hi. New to the forum.
I think I must be doing something wrong but I cannot seem to find the answer choices anywhere. For the verbal question of the day the answers were displayed underneath the question but they seem to be absent in this case. What am I missing? This is a data sufficiency question. Options for DS questions are always the same. The data sufficiency problem consists of a question and two statements, labeled (1) and (2), in which certain data are given. You have to decide whether the data given in the statements are sufficient for answering the question. Using the data given in the statements, plus your knowledge of mathematics and everyday facts (such as the number of days in July or the meaning of the word counterclockwise), you must indicate whether— A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked. B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked. C. BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked. D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked. E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed. I suggest you to go through the following post ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT. Hope this helps.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 21 May 2018
Posts: 17
Location: Singapore

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jul 2018, 06:22
Great question, almost got tricked into selecting C, but then decided to continue solving and plugging in values to test.
My solution below (a bit too timeconsuming for GMAT, but helps me with understanding). Let P = original price. New price = P(1+ x/100)(1 y/100) = P(1+ x/100  y/100 xy/1000) Test if (1+ x/100  y/100 xy/1000) > 1 xy xy/100 > 0 100x  100y  xy > 0  (1)
Statement (1) gives the same information as statement (2), which has more details.
Sub x = 1.2y into (1), 120y  100y  (1.2y)*y > 0 20y  1.2y^2 > 0 y (20  1.2y) > 0
Since y is a %, it has to be > 0 20  1.2y > 0 1.2y < 20 y < 20/1.2 = 16
The new price is only higher for y < 16



Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2016
Posts: 7

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2018, 20:45
Does question stem means that increase and decrease is on original price..? I did mistake as i did increase on original price and then decrease on the new price.



Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 168
Location: Argentina

Re M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Feb 2019, 11:59
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Would you please reelaborate statement 2 pls ? thank you Bunuel
_________________
The HARDER you work, the LUCKIER you get.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Re: M1612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2019, 01:43
patto wrote: I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Would you please reelaborate statement 2 pls ? thank you BunuelCheck here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/ifapricew ... 88067.html
_________________










