Last visit was: 15 Dec 2024, 03:34 It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 03:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,247
Own Kudos:
5,769
 []
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,247
Kudos: 5,769
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,247
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,247
Kudos: 5,769
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Reema18
Joined: 04 Aug 2017
Last visit: 02 Oct 2018
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sidvarma
Joined: 03 Feb 2018
Last visit: 31 Oct 2021
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 27
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Many zoologists have taken to studying the DNA of American coyote populations in an attempt to learn more about ancient canid populations, the ancestors of modern dogs. One problem with this pursuit is that American coyote populations have interbred heavily with feral dog populations. Thus, any group of coyotes zoologists decide to study will have significant amounts of dog DNA in its communal genome.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the zoologists' pursuit?

Conclusion: Any American coyotes that the zoologists choose to study wil have a dog's DNA in its genome.

A. All coyote populations have significant amounts of coyote DNA that can be easily distinguished from any dog DNA that might exist alongside it. This weakens the argument by stating that both these DNAs will exist separately still allowing the scientists to study American coyotes separately and de-coupled with dogs.
B. Most coyote populations have taken to foraging in the outskirts of human settlement. The conclusion does not mention anything about the whereabouts, so this is out of scope.
C. Many zoologists study more than one species of canid. So what? They can study as many as they like but it doesn't show how the conclusion is flawed
D. Many zoologists who study coyote DNA do not infer anything about ancient canids from the research they conduct. This comes a close second, but again, this is outside the purview of the conclusion because what the scientists choose to do with the research is another matter altogether. Does not weaken the conclusion identified above.
E. Even coyotes without any dog admixture differ substantially from ancient canids.
User avatar
kapstone1996
Joined: 12 Apr 2017
Last visit: 24 May 2022
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 3.1
Posts: 107
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Would this be an actual GMAT question for the strong wording, ALL?

I do get that negating the best choice is A, because you can differ the DNA
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts