Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 08:45 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 08:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guerrero25
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2019
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
5,205
 [18]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Posts: 244
Kudos: 5,205
 [18]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
neha24
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 01 Dec 2014
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
86
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 84
Kudos: 86
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 842
Own Kudos:
5,188
 [3]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 842
Kudos: 5,188
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
coolpintu
Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Last visit: 22 Nov 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 11
Kudos: 18
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion is that the method can be accurately used to estimate the maximum age of the atmosphere

Option A seems good. Keep it.
Option B is irrelevant. All layers having same levels cannot help us determine the levels of methane.
Option C is also irrelevant. Sources of methane will not help us estimate the levels for last decade.
Option D keep it for now.
Option E is also irrelevant with respect to the conclusion as it provides no information about methane levels.


Between A and D, used negation technique.
For D, There is a method superior…….. This does not attacks my conclusion.
For A, The quantities of methane have been usually large during past decade. Means now it can affect the data which is the basis for calculating the age. Attacks the argument and hence the right ans.

IMO A.
User avatar
guerrero25
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2019
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Posts: 244
Kudos: 5,205
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zarrolou
That's a good one, my answer is A.
The text says that "methane is often the final step in the decomposition of biomass" and they want to detemine the age of the earth " by taking the resulting increase in methane levels in the atmosphere over the past decade" and using it as a "scale".

This approch relies, generally speaking, on the uniformity of the methane during the years. If one period has had an unsual high level of methane then all the process will not be significant.
Now, basing my answer on this concept, I pick A:
(A)The quantities of methane release into the atmosphere have not been unusually large during the past decade.
As you can see A relies on the stats of the last decade, and if those are unusually high, the whole process is compromised.

There are also other good option as
(E)None of the methane released into the Earth’s atmosphere is used up by plant activity.
(C)There is methane that is released into the atmosphere from human activity, such as fossil fuel burning.
that could represent a good answer, but since we are talking about "the last decade", A (IMO) is better.

Waiting for OA...


Zarrolou - could I have approached "A" by negating it ?

That means last decade did see an unusually large amount of methane released. If the statement is true then the increase over the last decade would be much larger than the usual increase. But, how is the argument going to fall apart ? Is it because the methane production during the years is going to be uniform ? That's not been stated ... Appreciate if you could shed some light .
User avatar
Archit143
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Last visit: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 720
Own Kudos:
2,115
 [2]
Given Kudos: 70
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer must be A......
E is close...bt its just stregthener nt an assumption.
Its already stated int he argument that we know the total amount of Methane generated. So the methane used up by the plants and other source may also have been taken into consider.

Hence A must be the answer...

Cosnider Kudos If my post helps!!!!!!!!!!

Archit
User avatar
Archit143
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Last visit: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 720
Own Kudos:
2,115
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guerrero25
Zarrolou
That's a good one, my answer is A.
The text says that "methane is often the final step in the decomposition of biomass" and they want to detemine the age of the earth " by taking the resulting increase in methane levels in the atmosphere over the past decade" and using it as a "scale".

This approch relies, generally speaking, on the uniformity of the methane during the years. If one period has had an unsual high level of methane then all the process will not be significant.
Now, basing my answer on this concept, I pick A:
(A)The quantities of methane release into the atmosphere have not been unusually large during the past decade.
As you can see A relies on the stats of the last decade, and if those are unusually high, the whole process is compromised.

There are also other good option as
(E)None of the methane released into the Earth’s atmosphere is used up by plant activity.
(C)There is methane that is released into the atmosphere from human activity, such as fossil fuel burning.
that could represent a good answer, but since we are talking about "the last decade", A (IMO) is better.

Waiting for OA...


Zarrolou - could I have approached "A" by negating it ?

That means last decade did see an unusually large amount of methane released. If the statement is true then the increase over the last decade would be much larger than the usual increase. But, how is the argument going to fall apart ? Is it because the methane production during the years is going to be uniform ? That's not been stated ... Appreciate if you could shed some light .

Hi
I ll b happy if my post helps...
The argument states that u have to calculate a value fr last decade and use the same value fr approximation of the age of the earth. What if the value calculated fr last decade cannot be representative sample....

Hope that make sense
Consider kudos if my post helps!!!!


Archit
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 842
Own Kudos:
5,188
 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 842
Kudos: 5,188
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guerrero25


Zarrolou - could I have approached "A" by negating it ?

That means last decade did see an unusually large amount of methane released. If the statement is true then the increase over the last decade would be much larger than the usual increase. But, how is the argument going to fall apart ? Is it because the methane production during the years is going to be uniform ? That's not been stated ... Appreciate if you could shed some light .

If you negate A

(A)The quantities of methane release into the atmosphere have not been unusually large during the past decade.

The argument falls apart: it's clear that if you base your approach on unusual data, the conclusion will be flawed or weak.

Use a math-approach: if the levels of the last decade are NOT usual (as the case if we negate A), then calculus TOT/LastDecade will NOT give us a good info about the age of the earth. Only if the LastDecade number is correct, then the result will be correct.

Hope it's clear now, if not just send me a PM
User avatar
ashish8814
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Last visit: 28 May 2020
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 184
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i was stuck btw A and C. n got it wrong. but after careful observation and consideration one can find that A is the answer. as if there is some unusual activity during the last decade which has led to increase in methane concentration will lead to wrong estimate of earth's age.
option of plant consuming methane gas-i think if it remains the same will not led to wrong estimation.
same for-if gas is released into atmosphere by human activity. if all these phenomena are usual it will not lead to wrong estimation of earth's age.
hope it clarifies the doubt.
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"final step" is an important word -> lesson: do not ever underestimate any information that backs up the main argument in the passage.
avatar
GmatAssasin24
Joined: 01 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Posts: 15
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i chose 'D' but im still not able to get how can we assume 'A'
can someone please explain again in detail?
avatar
emeraldweapon
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2023
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.58
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatAssasin24
i chose 'D' but im still not able to get how can we assume 'A'
can someone please explain again in detail?

Will try my best.

The first two sentences are purely background information so you could skip them. The important part lies in the final one, which is also the conclusion:

"Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in methane levels in the atmosphere over the past decade and then determining how many decades of such increases it would have taken the atmosphere to reach current methane levels from a hypothetical initial methane-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's atmosphere can be accurately estimated"

The author stated that the maximum age of Earth's atmosphere can be accurately estimated. How? By determining the current level of methane (M) and then, dividing M to the increase in methane level in past decade (V). After all, we will have accurate age of Earth's atmosphere (A). In other words, A = M/T, assuming the starting point is zero.

The key phrases here is "accurately estimated". (A) could be accurately estimated if and only if (M) and (T) are accurately determined and reasonably assumed.

Option A tells us that (M) is not unusual and thus, we could use (M) to determine A. Negating option (A) does shatter the conclusion.
avatar
GmatAssasin24
Joined: 01 Jul 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Posts: 15
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you for this mathematical form of explanation

:)
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 813
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 813
Kudos: 615
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo A
Negating A
If the amount of methane in atmosphere has increased at a greater pace in the last decade we can not therefore estimate earth's atmosphere age .
There it is the necessary assumption.
User avatar
319537AM
Joined: 06 Apr 2016
Last visit: 24 Jun 2021
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 80
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Why is E incorrect? can someone give me solid reason to eliminate it?
User avatar
goaltop30mba
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 182
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 407
Posts: 182
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
319537AM
Hi,

Why is E incorrect? can someone give me solid reason to eliminate it?

The reason option e is incorrect is that it in a away it says that the level of methane wasn’t decreasing( being used by plants) ie. not decreasing means 1)increasing- if this happens, surely there will fluctuations in the level of methane hence the maximum age could probably increase, hence it won’t be possible to accurately determine what we want to

2) remains the same : which means that we will be accurately determine what we want to..

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
dhruvasv5
Joined: 26 Jul 2016
Last visit: 24 Sep 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 20
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Even if some of it is taken up by plant activity, that can happen over decades and the plan to calculate the age of atmosphere may still work out. Hence E is incorrect. Option A/E are the only two contenders here.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts