Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 07:14 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 07:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions
avatar
FocussedScorpion
Joined: 03 May 2018
Last visit: 22 May 2021
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
27
 [16]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 27
 [16]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
surendrasaini1
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Jan 2026
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Schools: Stern '26
Schools: Stern '26
Posts: 242
Kudos: 126
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Akash720
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Last visit: 05 Jun 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
273
 [1]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 216
Kudos: 273
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
militarytocorp
Joined: 24 Feb 2018
Last visit: 15 Nov 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GPA: 3.35
WE:Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Posts: 26
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO E
More monthly Mass Transit Metrocards are sold in the City X than are sold in City Y. It follows that City X citizens spend more time travelling by mass transit on a per capita basis than do City Y citizens.

All of the following, if true, weaken the argument except.

A. City Y has smaller population than City X.......obviously then the percapita basis calculation will not stand..therefore it weakens the argument...
B. Most City Y citizens work in City X and purchase City X metrocards......again wrt the no of citizens who are working in city X......no concern over the spending on percapita basis/population.....weaken
C. The number of working commuters as a percentage of the overall population is higher in City Y than in City X....same aspect as that of B....weaken
D. Most City X citizens use the mass transit system primarily during the work week only........not on the percapita/population basis. Therefore it weakens the argument.

E. The price of a City X Metrocard is 20% lower than a City Y Metrocard....Tricky option.....The price of a city X metrocard is less than that of City Y metrocard and therefore the comparison is based on something else which has little effect on the solution.
User avatar
4d
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Last visit: 25 Oct 2022
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
Posts: 119
Kudos: 411
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I think this question has many loopholes . Can experts clarify .

VeritasKarishma , GMATNinja
User avatar
Timebomb
Joined: 29 Nov 2016
Last visit: 07 Oct 2020
Posts: 179
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the question is flawed. Here is my analysis.

More monthly Mass Transit Metrocards are sold in the City X than are sold in City Y. It follows that City X citizens spend more time travelling by mass transit on a per capita basis than do City Y citizens.

All of the following, if true, weaken the argument except.

A. City Y has smaller population than City X. - argument talks about per capita time spent on travel, if population is high in X with higher number of cards sold in X, per capita amount could be the same. This statement weakens .

B. Most City Y citizens work in City X and purchase City X metrocards. this definitely weakens as citizens of Y buying cards from X falsely implies that citizen of X are travelling more .

C The number of working commuters as a percentage of the overall population is higher in City Y than in City X. this mildly weakens it as the big underlying assumption is that only working people commute through mass transit. But still it weakens it
D. Most City X citizens use the mass transit system primarily during the work week only. will not say it's a weakner per say, to me it has no impact. Saying that people commute over on weekdays and without having any reference or comparison to commuters of city Y, I would keep it since it has no impact.
E. The price of a City X Metrocard is 20% lower than a City Y Metrocard. - this Def is stenghtner, however it mildly strengthens , but this Def would make me beleive more in conclusion that people buy cheaper tickets in X and spend more time travelling using mass transit
Between D and E I will choose E. But I doubt if it's a very good quality question.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
PSP92
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2024
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 300
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 96
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't think Option D weakens the argument. Can somebody please clarify?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,421
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,421
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts