Bunuel
Most kindergarteners appear to have a desire to learn, but kindergarteners with specifically planned diets were determined to have increased abilities for sitting still for extended periods.
(A) were determined to have increased abilities
(B) have been determined to have an increased ability
(C) were determined to have an increasing ability
(D) had been determined to have increased abilities
(E) have been determined to have increasing abilities
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:
(Error in Tense) if there is an error in the underlined part (“were determined to have increased abilities”), it must be either relating to tense in the phrase “were determined,” or relating to number in the phrase “increased abilities.”
A quick look at the answer choice shows the phrases “have been determined,” “were determined,” ” had been determined” and “have been determined,” giving us the hint that we should examinee the given sentence for an error in the use of the correct tense.
There is indeed such an error, because the first part of the sentence (appears to have a desire) is in the present tense, while the second underlined part (were determined to have) is in the past tense. So (A) is wrong.
(C) and (D) also have the same error, and can be rejected for that reason alone.
(B) and (E) both have the correct present perfect tense. But (B) mentions “an increased ability,” while (E) talks of “increasing abilities.”
The first part of the sentence talks of a completed action, “with a specially planned diet” and its effect must also be something completed such as “an increased ability,” and not something incomplete, such as “increasing” so, (B) is a better choice than (E), and is the answer.