Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 18:49 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 18:49
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   
User avatar
MofeBhatia
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 May 2020
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
135
 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 60
Kudos: 135
 [2]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 12 May 2019, 01:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
Show more

Premise - Motorcycle safety course teach important techniques for safe driving and 92% of all motorcyclists are involved in accidents had never taken a safety course.

Pre-thinking - I would like to know how the likelihood of the 8% motorcyclists who took the course to be involved in the accident.

Quote:

(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
Show more

Matches with pre-thinking. Correct.

Quote:

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone
Show more
Out of scope. The stem doesn't talk about the passenger behind the rider.

Quote:

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer
Show more
Contents of the motorcycle-safety course is not the focus of the stem. Number of motorcyclists who have taken is the course is the primary focus.

Quote:

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.
Show more
Whether accidents involve were collisions btw motocycle and another vehicle or motorcycle and car or motocycle and space shuttle is not important.
Motorcyclist is involve in a accident is enough to be considerd.

Quote:

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.
Show more
Again size and potential speed are not important.

Answer A.
avatar
ManjotSaini
avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2019
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
12
 [12]
Given Kudos: 104
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 12
 [12]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 17 Jun 2019, 04:21
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,

Look at the following situation:
Say 100 people are involved in serious motorcycle accident:

According to the stimulus we know that 92 people did not take the course and 8 people took the course.
Now assume that the overall number of motorcyclists is 1000:
And out of these 920 did not attend the course and 80 attended the course.
So this means that out of 920 people who did not attend the course 92 got involved in accident – 10%

Also 8 people out of 80 who did attend the course got into accident – again 10%

Therefore to confirm that taking the course prevents accidents we need to know whether more than 8% of people take the course.
User avatar
sayan640
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,179
Own Kudos:
813
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,179
Kudos: 813
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 05 Jan 2020, 13:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
GPEP1.png
Show more

VeritasKarishma Can you please explain this question ?
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [9]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [9]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 05 Jan 2020, 23:36
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
GPEP1.png
Show more

92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.
These courses teach important safety techniques.

Conclusion: If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents.

This is a useful to evaluate question - what would help us figure out whether the data cited supports our conclusion.
The data cited just tells us that 92% of motorcyclists who were in serious accidents had not taken the course. Using this, it is urging us that all motorcyclists should take the course. What we need to know is how many of those who are not in an accident took the course.

Say 1000 people ride motorcycles.
Say there were 100 serious accidents in the year. We know that of these 100, 92 have not taken the course and 8 have.
So 900 people did not have any serious accident.

Now what if we find out that out of the remaining 900 people, none had taken the course? It seems that the course teaches something that is causing accidents!! Does it support our conclusion of taking the course - NO

What if we were to find out that of the remaining 900 people, 400 had taken the course? Now it seems that the course did make people follow safety rules. Among non-accident people, a large number had taken the course while among the accident-people, very few had taken the course.

This is what option (A) says.

(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
If overall, much higher percentage of the people take the course then it makes sense that the course helps. If overall only 8% people (or even lower) take the course, the number of 92 is what we would expect anyway so taking the course would not have helped.

All other options are irrelevant.

Answer (A)
avatar
KarishmaChauhan
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2019
Last visit: 29 Feb 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 27 Jan 2020, 07:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
GPEP1.png
Show more

Can someone help me explain why A is correct, I have seen expert's replies but I am having a hard time to correlate the two proportion: 1) Proportion of total motocyclists who have taken motocycle-safety-course and 2) Proportion of people involved in Accident who have taken motorcycle-safety-course.

As per my understanding even if 8% of people involved in accident have taken safety course and 4% of the total population have taken a safety course there is a good chance that 8% is only 0.2% of the total population we don't know what proportion of total population of motorcyclists was involved in accident and which will mean we can still prove that motorcyclist lessons were effective even if the proportion is below 8% of the total population. According to me the argument will be strengthened if choice A mentioned that 8% of people involved in accident who took safety course is actually what proportion of the total motocyclists who took motorcycle-safety-course.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [5]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 17 Feb 2020, 20:29
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaChauhan
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?

(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
GPEP1.png

Can someone help me explain why A is correct, I have seen expert's replies but I am having a hard time to correlate the two proportion: 1) Proportion of total motocyclists who have taken motocycle-safety-course and 2) Proportion of people involved in Accident who have taken motorcycle-safety-course.

As per my understanding even if 8% of people involved in accident have taken safety course and 4% of the total population have taken a safety course there is a good chance that 8% is only 0.2% of the total population we don't know what proportion of total population of motorcyclists was involved in accident and which will mean we can still prove that motorcyclist lessons were effective even if the proportion is below 8% of the total population. According to me the argument will be strengthened if choice A mentioned that 8% of people involved in accident who took safety course is actually what proportion of the total motocyclists who took motorcycle-safety-course.
Show more
The logic of this argument does not depend on knowing the absolute figure or the exact proportion of people who have taken a motorcycle safety course.

The logic of this argument DOES depend on an assumption that the population of motorcyclists who are involved in a serious accident is representative of the entire population of motorcyclists.

While it would certainly be nice to know the exact proportions here, none of the answer choices offer that information. So we're left to pick the choice that most helps us evaluate the logic of the argument. (A) gives us enough information to know whether the population of motorcyclists in a serious accident actually is representative of the greater population of motorcyclists (or not).

That's why (A) is worth keeping. Plus, ultimately no other answer choice does a better job at helping us evaluate the argument.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If that doesn't resolve your doubt, let's revisit the more thorough explanation I attempted to convey in my earlier post):

First imagine that 92% of motorcyclists have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

  • If we pick a motorcyclist at random, there's a 92% chance that he/she has never taken a motorcycle-safety course.
  • So if we pick a group of motorcyclists at random, we would expect that about 92% of the group have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

Then, imagine that the course is absolutely useless. In other words, it has no impact on your odds of getting into a serious motorcycle accident.

  • Now, if we randomly pick a motorcyclist who has been in a serious accident, there's still a 92% chance that he/she has never taken a safety course. These odds haven't changed from our first scenario, because the course has no impact on your odds of being involved in a serious accident).
  • So if we randomly pick a group of motorcyclists who have been in serious accidents (and if the course is useless) then we would expect that about 92% of the group have never taken a safety course.

Now, take another look at the passage:

    "Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course."

  • Well, IF 92% of motorcyclists have never taken a safety course and IF the course is useless, then that is exactly the data that we should expect!
  • In other words, if (i) 92% of motorcyclists have never taken a safety course and if (ii) 92% of motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a safety course, then we have evidence that the safety course has no impact on the odds of being involved in a serious accident.

However, if only a small portion of all motorcyclists (for instance, 10%) have never taken a safety course, while 92% of motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a safety course, then we have evidence that the safety course is actually quite useful. In this case:

  • MOST motorcyclists have taken the course.
  • Yet, most of the motorcyclists involved in serious accidents have NOT taken the course.
  • This suggests that your odds of getting into a serious accident are much higher if you have NOT taken the safety course.

That's why we'd want to know whether significantly less than 92% of motorcyclists have NEVER taken a safety course. If so, then we have evidence that the safety course is effective. If not, we have evidence that the safety course is not effective. This is the same as choice (A), just written a different way. :cool:

VeritasKarishma gives a more numerical explanation here.

I hope that makes it more clear! If not, please try to let us know what part of the explanation doesn't make sense to you, and we'll do our best to help!
avatar
jvdunn26
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 Oct 2018
Last visit: 30 Sep 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
127
Given Kudos: 113
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: Darden '23 (D) Yale '23 (D) Ross '23 (M$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 780 Q49 V51 (Online)
GPA: 3.26
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Schools: Darden '23 (D) Yale '23 (D) Ross '23 (M$)
GMAT 2: 780 Q49 V51 (Online)
Posts: 14
Kudos: 127
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 28 Mar 2020, 17:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If Option A confuses you, elimination of B - D is extremely effective in this case.

(B) I think we can agree passengers are irrelevant here.
(C) The problem discusses a binary situation: either motorcyclists have or have not taken a course. The quality of the course is not relevant.
(D) A motorcycle accident could be serious even if it did not involve another vehicle. Further, the safety courses effectively covered both scenarios: "important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users"
(E) This question relates only to preventing specific outcomes. Causes are irrelevant.
User avatar
XavierAlexander
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
409
Given Kudos: 5,540
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 44
Kudos: 409
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach Updated on: 16 Oct 2021, 07:42
Originally posted by XavierAlexander on 05 Jul 2020, 07:36.
Last edited by XavierAlexander on 16 Oct 2021, 07:42, edited 2 times in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise:- If 100 motorcyclists have met with accidents, then around 90 haven't taken the safety course.
Conclusion:- Therefore, safety courses would have avoided these accidents.

Let's use the Yes-No test for the tricky Option A. :
i.e. acceptance and denial of the option statement either strengthen or weaken the conclusion.

Option A:- Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists (say 50% = 50) have taken a motorcycle-safety course

Yes --> 50 motorcyclists in concern have taken the safety course. --> This Weakens the conclusion as it implies that even the motorcyclists trained with safety course have met with accidents. Thus safety training wouldn't have helped much.

No --> Only 10 motorcyclists have taken the safety course. --> This Strengthens the conclusion, indicating that since majority have not taken the safety course they couldn't avoid accidents.


Other options are quite irrelevant, and pretty to easy to spot that they don't work per Yes-No test. Thus Option A is the right answer.


Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occuring.


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
GPEP1.png
Show more
avatar
rajsekhark
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2017
Last visit: 14 Mar 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 96
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Strategy
Posts: 7
Kudos: 7
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 04 Oct 2020, 07:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TeamGMATIFY
Akgmat85
i find that i got trapped since argument speaks about motorcyclists who are involved in a serious accident, and answer choice talks about all motorcyclists, so i ruled it out as comparing two different subsets of data.

So to that, is it just a poorly written question or is it like that on purpose? and if on purpose, how do u reconcile comparing two subsets of data?

First of all, you need to understand the pattern how GMAT is testing you. For example %centages - normally GMAT tests the students:
1) Comparing %tages and actual Numbers
2) Changing the base of the %tages

So this question falls in the second category and as a student, you need to understand that change and be mindful of these changes.

This is not at all poorly written question and you need to practice more these type of questions to get a hang of these questions.

All the best.
Show more


The person has pointed out the exact discrepancy that is evident in the question. It is also exactly what you have mentioned in Point#2 --- 2) Changing the base of the %tages

Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course. mentions motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident only.

(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course talks about eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course , not motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident.

Why would one consider the 8% in Option A to be part of the 100% to which the previously mentioned 92% belongs?

Can anyone please help in specifying what I missed out?
GMAT does not interchange key words of sets and subsets, which is evidently done here.
avatar
Suryanshi
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Oct 2019
Last visit: 26 Mar 2021
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 8
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 12
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 09 Nov 2020, 05:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have read all the explanations below but I am still not able to wrap my head around the fact that A is the right answer instead of D. Following is how I approached this question-:

A. How does that matter if more than 8% of motorcyclists have taken the course? We need to concentrate on the motorcyclists with accidents and if 92% of those haven't taken the course, we already ready know that 8%of the motorcyclists have taken the course. So I don't see how A will contribute to us reaching a correct solution. I mean A would have been OK if it would have talked about all motorcyclists and not just 8% of it since (as in what proportion of motorcyclists who take the course and end up in accident). Because no matter what proportion we find out from asking A, until and unless we know about the relation of that proportion to accidents, how does that answer to A matters?

D. Clearly, brings another view int the picture? What proportion of accidents had another moving vehicle in the picture? which means it could be that it is another vehicle's fault and not the motorcyclists' bad handling. which could in turn tell us that motorcyclists' training doesn't matter really?

I understand in the second case as well, we have to make some assumption. But to be honest, in case of A as well that seems to be the case (at least to me)

Did I babble too much? But still thank you for having the patience of reading this whoever did and I really hope someone could clear up this for me in a simple language.
User avatar
thangvietnam
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
418
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
 [1]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 09 Nov 2020, 07:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we have only 2 minutes for each cr question. make the reasoning simple.
choice A is the only choice which is relevant to the statistics in the argument. other choices are not relevant. we give choice A a deep analysis.

evaluate question is potential weakening question

if substantially more than 8 percent , say , 15 percent of general drivers take the course and 8 percent=100-92 percent of the persons who involve in accidents take the course, this mean among person who involve in accident, only 8 percent take the course while for all persons, 15 percent take the course- this mean among persons who involve accident , the portion who take the course is lower than the portion of the total population who take the course-this mean if you take the course, you are at risk of 8 percent to be in accident and if you dont take the course, you are at risk of 15 percent to be in accident.

taking course is safer.
this kind of statistic problem is more easy if you know this kind before you are in test room
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [3]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 09 Nov 2020, 08:47
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occurring.
Show more

This is a SAMPLING argument.
Of cyclists involved in accidents, 92% did not take a safety course, implying that 8% DID take a safety course.
The passage offers statistics about SOME cyclists -- those involved in accidents -- and draws a conclusion about ALL cyclists.
Look for an answer choice that could make or break the link between SOME cyclists and ALL cyclists.

A: Whether significantly more than eight percent of [ALL] motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
Test what happens if exactly 8% of all cyclists took a safety course.
To organize the data, we can use a double-matrix:

.............................Course..........No course............Total

Accident....................8.....................92..................100

No accident

Total.........................80...................920................1000

In the matrix above:
Of 1000 cyclists, exactly 8% took the course.
Of 100 accident victims, exactly 8% took the course.
Accident rate for course-takers = 8/80 = 10%.
Accident rate for non-course-takers = 92/920 = 10%.
The rate is the SAME in each case, weakening the conclusion that the course prevents accidents.
Thus, to conclude that the course prevents accidents, we need to know whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course.

Show Spoiler
A
.
avatar
Suryanshi
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Oct 2019
Last visit: 26 Mar 2021
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 8
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 12
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 09 Nov 2020, 21:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you
GMATGuruNY
for a detailed solution. I understand the reasoning now.

GMATGuruNY
Marcab
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach motorcyclists important techniques for handling and for safely sharing the road with other road users. If more motorcyclists took these courses, there would be fewer serious motorcycle accidents. Data show that 92% of the motorcyclists who are involved in a serious motorcycle accident have never taken a motorcycle-safety course.

In assessing whether the data cited provided support for the position taken about motorcyclists' taking the courses, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course

(B ) Whether it is riskier for a motorcyclist to ride with a passenger behind the rider than to ride alone

(C) Whether the different organizations that offer motorcycle-safety courses differ in the content of the courses that they offer

(D) Whether more than 92% of serious motorcycle accidents involve collisions between a motorcycle and another vehicle in motion.

(E) Whether variations in the size and potential speed of a motorcycle influence the risk of a serious accident's occurring.

This is a SAMPLING argument.
Of cyclists involved in accidents, 92% did not take a safety course, implying that 8% DID take a safety course.
The passage offers statistics about SOME cyclists -- those involved in accidents -- and draws a conclusion about ALL cyclists.
Look for an answer choice that could make or break the link between SOME cyclists and ALL cyclists.

A: Whether significantly more than eight percent of [ALL] motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
Test what happens if exactly 8% of all cyclists took a safety course.
To organize the data, we can use a double-matrix:

.............................Course..........No course............Total

Accident....................8.....................92..................100

No accident

Total.........................80...................920................1000

In the matrix above:
Of 1000 cyclists, exactly 8% took the course.
Of 100 accident victims, exactly 8% took the course.
Accident rate for course-takers = 8/80 = 10%.
Accident rate for non-course-takers = 92/920 = 10%.
The rate is the SAME in each case, weakening the conclusion that the course prevents accidents.
Thus, to conclude that the course prevents accidents, we need to know whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course.

Show Spoiler
A
.
Show more
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 24 Nov 2020, 01:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suryanshi
I have read all the explanations below but I am still not able to wrap my head around the fact that A is the right answer instead of D. Following is how I approached this question-:

A. How does that matter if more than 8% of motorcyclists have taken the course? We need to concentrate on the motorcyclists with accidents and if 92% of those haven't taken the course, we already ready know that 8%of the motorcyclists have taken the course. So I don't see how A will contribute to us reaching a correct solution. I mean A would have been OK if it would have talked about all motorcyclists and not just 8% of it since (as in what proportion of motorcyclists who take the course and end up in accident). Because no matter what proportion we find out from asking A, until and unless we know about the relation of that proportion to accidents, how does that answer to A matters?

D. Clearly, brings another view int the picture? What proportion of accidents had another moving vehicle in the picture? which means it could be that it is another vehicle's fault and not the motorcyclists' bad handling. which could in turn tell us that motorcyclists' training doesn't matter really?

I understand in the second case as well, we have to make some assumption. But to be honest, in case of A as well that seems to be the case (at least to me)

Did I babble too much? But still thank you for having the patience of reading this whoever did and I really hope someone could clear up this for me in a simple language.
Show more

Hi Suryanshi

You are spot on about option (D) in stating that it requires a leap of faith to assuming that it could be other vehicle's fault and not bad handling by the motor cyclists in question.

Let us come back to answer option (A). We know that 8% of riders in accidents have taken the course and 92% such riders have not. This is used to draw the conclusion that the course helps in rider safety.

However, what if, of all motorcyclists, a proportion much greater than 8% (say, 25%) has taken the course. Now we have a situation where 25% of all motorcyclists have taken the course but only 8% of motorcyclists in accidents have attended the course. If the course has no impact on subsequent rider safety, then we would not expect much difference in the proportion of riders who have taken the course and the proportion of riders in accidents who have taken the course - both should be similar proportions.

Thus, answering option (A) helps to determine if the course has a material impact on rider safety.

Hope this helps.
avatar
Suryanshi
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Oct 2019
Last visit: 26 Mar 2021
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 8
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Schools: Tepper '23 (A)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 12
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 24 Nov 2020, 09:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi
CrackVerbalGMAT
,

Thank you for making it so simple. I finally understand and appreciate the logic to chose A now. :)

CrackVerbalGMAT
Suryanshi
I have read all the explanations below but I am still not able to wrap my head around the fact that A is the right answer instead of D. Following is how I approached this question-:

A. How does that matter if more than 8% of motorcyclists have taken the course? We need to concentrate on the motorcyclists with accidents and if 92% of those haven't taken the course, we already ready know that 8%of the motorcyclists have taken the course. So I don't see how A will contribute to us reaching a correct solution. I mean A would have been OK if it would have talked about all motorcyclists and not just 8% of it since (as in what proportion of motorcyclists who take the course and end up in accident). Because no matter what proportion we find out from asking A, until and unless we know about the relation of that proportion to accidents, how does that answer to A matters?

D. Clearly, brings another view int the picture? What proportion of accidents had another moving vehicle in the picture? which means it could be that it is another vehicle's fault and not the motorcyclists' bad handling. which could in turn tell us that motorcyclists' training doesn't matter really?

I understand in the second case as well, we have to make some assumption. But to be honest, in case of A as well that seems to be the case (at least to me)

Did I babble too much? But still thank you for having the patience of reading this whoever did and I really hope someone could clear up this for me in a simple language.

Hi Suryanshi

You are spot on about option (D) in stating that it requires a leap of faith to assuming that it could be other vehicle's fault and not bad handling by the motor cyclists in question.

Let us come back to answer option (A). We know that 8% of riders in accidents have taken the course and 92% such riders have not. This is used to draw the conclusion that the course helps in rider safety.

However, what if, of all motorcyclists, a proportion much greater than 8% (say, 25%) has taken the course. Now we have a situation where 25% of all motorcyclists have taken the course but only 8% of motorcyclists in accidents have attended the course. If the course has no impact on subsequent rider safety, then we would not expect much difference in the proportion of riders who have taken the course and the proportion of riders in accidents who have taken the course - both should be similar proportions.

Thus, answering option (A) helps to determine if the course has a material impact on rider safety.

Hope this helps.
Show more
User avatar
Ansh777
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2019
Last visit: 06 Jun 2023
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
172
 [1]
Given Kudos: 129
Location: India
Schools: Booth '24 Columbia CBS '24 Darden '24 Fuqua '24 Haas '24 Harvard '24 LBS '24 Stanford '24 Kellogg '24 Wharton '24
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Schools: Booth '24 Columbia CBS '24 Darden '24 Fuqua '24 Haas '24 Harvard '24 LBS '24 Stanford '24 Kellogg '24 Wharton '24
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 56
Kudos: 172
 [1]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 18 Feb 2021, 06:32
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Now say number of motorcyclist who met serious accident are 100 out of which 92 never took course, while 8 took course
Let assume that total number of motorcyclist is 1000 out of which 920 never took course and 80 took course
A: >80 took Course, say 600 out of which only 8 met accident so course does reduces accidents
<80 took course; say 8 took course and 8 met accident then course has no effect.
Attachments

Motor.PNG
Motor.PNG [ 4.15 KiB | Viewed 4350 times ]

User avatar
Tanchat
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 14 Jun 2022, 11:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
SidJainGMAT
Hello Verbal Experts (GMATNinja,e-Gmat)

I am confused how option A is the answer?

Can someone help over here..

Thanks in advance!
Quote:
A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
We are told that 92% of the motorcyclists involved in serious accidents (NOT 92% of ALL motorcyclists) have never taken a safety course. This also means that 8% of those involved in serious accidents HAVE taken a safety course.

Before we dig into choice (A), pretend that half of ALL motorcyclists took a safety course and the other half did not. In that case, consider the following possible results from the data:

  • Half of motorcyclists involved in serious accidents took the course and half did not (an even split) - this would suggest that the course had no effect. Motorcyclists who took a safety course were just as likely to get in a serious accident as motorcyclists who did not take a safety course.
  • Most motorcyclists involved in serious accidents did NOT take the course - this would suggest that the course did help. Motorcyclists who did not take the course were MORE likely to get in a serious accident.

Now, what if only 8% of all motorcyclists have taken a safety course? Well, if the course was useless, then we would expect that 8% of those involved in serious accidents have taken the course. It would be like if we painted blue nail polish on 8% of all motorcyclists. If the nail polish has no effect on safety, then we would expect 8% of those involved in serious accidents to have blue nail polish. In other words, those with blue nail polish are just as likely to be involved in a serious accident as those without blue nail polish.

Similarly, if only 8% of motorcyclists have taken a safety course, then this would suggest that the safety courses did NOT have a significant effect on safety, hurting the argument. However, if significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course, then the data would suggest that the safety courses were effective.

Thus, choice (A) is the best answer.
Show more

GMATNinja

"Similarly, if only 8% of motorcyclists have taken a safety course, then this would suggest that the safety courses did NOT have a significant effect on safety, hurting the argument. However, if significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course, then the data would suggest that the safety courses were effective."

To evaluate the benefits of taking course, we require ratio Total of motorcyclists who have taken the course and involved in serious accident to Total of motorcyclists who have taken the course, right? Then, The lesser the ratio, the more effective the safety courses.

I have taken tons of time to find a reason why it has to be 8% (finally I did it!!) and the logic that you said "Now, what if only 8% of all motorcyclists have taken a safety course? Well, if the course was useless, then we would expect that 8% of those involved in serious accidents have taken the course. It would be like if we painted blue nail polish on 8% of all motorcyclists. If the nail polish has no effect on safety, then we would expect 8% of those involved in serious accidents to have blue nail polish. In other words, those with blue nail polish are just as likely to be involved in a serious accident as those without blue nail polish."


In CR, do I have to understand the reason of why it has to be "NUMBER" ?
Could you provide good practice to handle this problem?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 20 Jun 2022, 15:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat
GMATNinja
SidJainGMAT
Hello Verbal Experts (GMATNinja,e-Gmat)

I am confused how option A is the answer?

Can someone help over here..

Thanks in advance!
Quote:
A) Whether significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course
We are told that 92% of the motorcyclists involved in serious accidents (NOT 92% of ALL motorcyclists) have never taken a safety course. This also means that 8% of those involved in serious accidents HAVE taken a safety course.

Before we dig into choice (A), pretend that half of ALL motorcyclists took a safety course and the other half did not. In that case, consider the following possible results from the data:

  • Half of motorcyclists involved in serious accidents took the course and half did not (an even split) - this would suggest that the course had no effect. Motorcyclists who took a safety course were just as likely to get in a serious accident as motorcyclists who did not take a safety course.
  • Most motorcyclists involved in serious accidents did NOT take the course - this would suggest that the course did help. Motorcyclists who did not take the course were MORE likely to get in a serious accident.

Now, what if only 8% of all motorcyclists have taken a safety course? Well, if the course was useless, then we would expect that 8% of those involved in serious accidents have taken the course. It would be like if we painted blue nail polish on 8% of all motorcyclists. If the nail polish has no effect on safety, then we would expect 8% of those involved in serious accidents to have blue nail polish. In other words, those with blue nail polish are just as likely to be involved in a serious accident as those without blue nail polish.

Similarly, if only 8% of motorcyclists have taken a safety course, then this would suggest that the safety courses did NOT have a significant effect on safety, hurting the argument. However, if significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course, then the data would suggest that the safety courses were effective.

Thus, choice (A) is the best answer.

GMATNinja

"Similarly, if only 8% of motorcyclists have taken a safety course, then this would suggest that the safety courses did NOT have a significant effect on safety, hurting the argument. However, if significantly more than eight percent of motorcyclists have taken a motorcycle-safety course, then the data would suggest that the safety courses were effective."

To evaluate the benefits of taking course, we require ratio Total of motorcyclists who have taken the course and involved in serious accident to Total of motorcyclists who have taken the course, right? Then, The lesser the ratio, the more effective the safety courses.

I have taken tons of time to find a reason why it has to be 8% (finally I did it!!) and the logic that you said "Now, what if only 8% of all motorcyclists have taken a safety course? Well, if the course was useless, then we would expect that 8% of those involved in serious accidents have taken the course. It would be like if we painted blue nail polish on 8% of all motorcyclists. If the nail polish has no effect on safety, then we would expect 8% of those involved in serious accidents to have blue nail polish. In other words, those with blue nail polish are just as likely to be involved in a serious accident as those without blue nail polish."


In CR, do I have to understand the reason of why it has to be "NUMBER" ?
Could you provide good practice to handle this problem?
Show more
There's no need to approach a "numbers" question any differently than you would approach a different type of CR question. Here, we have to find the answer choice that would help us to evaluate the argument. As you go through the answer choices, you just want to think about which one would help you assess how valid the author's reasoning is.

(A) features a question about the percentage of motorcycle riders who have taken the safety course. Answering this question would fill in a massive gap in the argument: how effective is the safety course, really? So, (A) would be super helpful in evaluating the argument.

In short, just do the same thing on a "numbers" question as you would in any other CR question. You can find out more about that flexible approach here.

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
himanshu0123
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Last visit: 20 Mar 2023
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 190
Kudos: 5
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 06 Aug 2022, 02:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in option A] am actually not clear with the fact that in qsn stem we are saying 92% of the people involved in accident and option A] says 8% of general population

How do I relate the two facts when the basis are not very same?
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
537
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 430
Kudos: 537
 [1]
Motorcycle-safety courses, offered by a number of organizations, teach 08 Aug 2022, 08:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
himanshu0123
in option A] am actually not clear with the fact that in qsn stem we are saying 92% of the people involved in accident and option A] says 8% of general population

How do I relate the two facts when the basis are not very same?
Show more

Among motorcyclists who have had accidents, 8% have taken the course (100% – 92%, from the original information).
Among motorcyclists who have NOT had accidents, let's say X% have taken the course.

Those two pools of motorcyclists combined contain ALL motorcyclists.
Therefore, the percentage of ALL motorcyclists who have taken the course is a weighted average of 8% and X%.

If that weighted average is significantly greater than 8%, then
8% < weighted average < X%
and therefore people who HAVE taken the course are over-represented among all motorcyclists who have NOT had accidents, relative to the overall average. That's evidence that the course is effective in reducing accidents.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts