Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 14:54 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 14:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
udaymathapati
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Last visit: 27 Jan 2015
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
5,151
 []
Given Kudos: 15
Products:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 5,151
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
soumanag
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 80
Kudos: 358
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,849
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,255
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,849
Kudos: 685,389
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rite2deepti
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 May 2011
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Concentration: International Business, finance
WE 1: Business Development Manger
WE 2: Assistant Manager-Carbon Trading
WE 3: Manager-Carbon Trading
Posts: 32
Kudos: 358
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
udaymathapati
Mr Tolstoy bought 100 CDs at $x and sold them at $y. Did Mr Tolstoy profit from the deal?
1. 40% of x > 30% of y
2. 30% of x > 40% of y

Request bunuel to explain with detail. I am finding it difficult to decipher the explaination given belw.

stmt1> we get, x>0.75. Thus, x=0.8y>0.75y, which case y>x and Mr Tolstoy made a profit or x=2y >0.75y, in which case, he did not make profit. Thus we can't conclude whether he made a profit or not.

Question asks is \(100y>100x\)? or is \(y>x\)? or is \(\frac{y}{x}>1\)?

(1) \(0.4x>0.3y\) --> \(\frac{y}{x}<\frac{4}{3}\). So we can not be sure whether \(\frac{y}{x}>1\). Not sufficient.

(2) \(0.3x>0.4y\) --> \(\frac{y}{x}<\frac{3}{4}<1\). So the answer to the question "is \(\frac{y}{x}>1\)" is NO. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

Can we plug in numbers ..I find that easy and less confusing ..If you can explain by plugging in numbers it will be helpful ...
avatar
muralimba
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 65
Kudos: 528
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rite2deepti
Bunuel
udaymathapati
Mr Tolstoy bought 100 CDs at $x and sold them at $y. Did Mr Tolstoy profit from the deal?
1. 40% of x > 30% of y
2. 30% of x > 40% of y

Request bunuel to explain with detail. I am finding it difficult to decipher the explaination given belw.

stmt1> we get, x>0.75. Thus, x=0.8y>0.75y, which case y>x and Mr Tolstoy made a profit or x=2y >0.75y, in which case, he did not make profit. Thus we can't conclude whether he made a profit or not.

Question asks is \(100y>100x\)? or is \(y>x\)? or is \(\frac{y}{x}>1\)?

(1) \(0.4x>0.3y\) --> \(\frac{y}{x}<\frac{4}{3}\). So we can not be sure whether \(\frac{y}{x}>1\). Not sufficient.

(2) \(0.3x>0.4y\) --> \(\frac{y}{x}<\frac{3}{4}<1\). So the answer to the question "is \(\frac{y}{x}>1\)" is NO. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

Can we plug in numbers ..I find that easy and less confusing ..If you can explain by plugging in numbers it will be helpful ...

Deepti ,

I would like to suggest u in this regard,

GMAT testmakers never expect the testtakers to plug in the #s and find out the answer. They prepare the questions in such a way that finding the answer for them by using the logic would be much more easier and effective than by plugging-in the #s.

TRY TO FIND THE TESTMAKER'S (QUESTION MAKER'S) LOGIC BEHIND THE QUESTION. ---As Bunuel did. This comes with the practice.

Anybody can correct me if i am wrong.

To the original question:

Question asks is x>y (loss) or y>x (Profit)
stmnt1: 4x>3y ==> x/y > 3/4 (Note that x and y must be +ve #s as these are selling/buying prices, and hence can safely be corssmultiplied)
==> hence x/y may/may not be > 1 (i.e 4/4) NOT SUFF.

stmnt2: 3x>4y ==> x/y > 4/3 ==> x/y shud be > 1 (i.e. 3/3) ==> x SHUD be > y ==> he got a "loss"
SUFF.

ANSWER "B".

Regards,
Murali.
Kudos.
User avatar
vaibhavtripathi
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Last visit: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Status:I rest, I rust.
Concentration: IT Major
Schools:ISB - Co 2013
 Q48  V34 GMAT 2: 760  Q50  V44
GPA: 2.5-3.0
WE 1: IT Professional since 2006
Posts: 67
Kudos: 212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
udaymathapati
Mr Tolstoy bought 100 CDs at $x and sold them at $y. Did Mr Tolstoy profit from the deal?
1. 40% of x > 30% of y
2. 30% of x > 40% of y

Request bunuel to explain with detail. I am finding it difficult to decipher the explaination given belw.

stmt1> we get, x>0.75. Thus, x=0.8y>0.75y, which case y>x and Mr Tolstoy made a profit or x=2y >0.75y, in which case, he did not make profit. Thus we can't conclude whether he made a profit or not.

Mr. T would make a profit if \(X<Y\) or \(\frac{X}{Y} < 1\),
Mr. T would incur a loss if \(X>Y\) or \(\frac{X}{Y} > 1\).

S1: 40% of x > 30% of y, so \(4X > 3Y\) or \(\frac{X}{Y} > \frac{3}{4}\), but is it greater than 1? we dont know. Not sufficient.
S2: 30% of x > 40% of y, so \(3X > 4Y\) or \(\frac{X}{Y} > \frac{4}{3}\), which is clearly greater than 1. So Mr. T incurred a loss. Sufficient

Answer: B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 35,799
Own Kudos:
Posts: 35,799
Kudos: 929
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97848 posts