Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:37 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Business|   Short Passage|                           
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
homersimpsons
Joined: 26 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
471
 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.15
WE:Accounting (Finance: Investment Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhola
Joined: 09 Oct 2019
Last visit: 04 Jul 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Posts: 41
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
theeliteguy
Hi EMPOWERgmatRichC ,

Please help me with the following question.

The passage is primarily concerned with

A. challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products

B. suggesting new marketing strategies for attracting consumers to new products

C. reconciling two different views about the effect of price on consumers??? willingness to try new products

D. describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products

E. discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products

I made the following notes:

1 = OLD STUDY: RISK VS (PRICE AND ADS) -> AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIP
2 = NEW STUDY: MANUF. AFFECTS RISK; OLD STUDIES: RELATIONSHIP COMPLEX

(A) The author is not challenging anything here. OUT
(B) The author did not suggest anything. He mentioned the findings. OUT
(C) ? / Selected this as the answer as I thought Author is making links between old and new studies.
(D) No new approach mentioned. Out
(E) The correct Answer


In passage, author presents the findings of new study and old study. There is no final opinion or any consensus between both studies to present as conclusion in the end. The whole passage has : old study says this; new study says this. This is key reason that C can not be an answer. E fits in because of presenting these findings.

I hope it is clear.
User avatar
rocky620
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 11 May 2023
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail: E-commerce)
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
Posts: 501
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
I have a general query, related to RC passage as whole.

Are all questions in a particular RC passage, of the same difficulty level or there may/can be multiple levels of difficulty in them?

Thanks.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rocky620
Hi Experts,
I have a general query, related to RC passage as whole.

Are all questions in a particular RC passage, of the same difficulty level or there may/can be multiple levels of difficulty in them?

Thanks.
Good question, rocky620. If the OG is any indicator, the questions from one passage are all grouped together under one general level of difficulty. However, given the computer-adaptive nature of the test and the fact that some passages in the OG and Verbal Review have seven or eight questions (something that will not happen on the test), I suspect that within a general level of difficulty, certain questions may be cycled in or out based on test-taker performance.

- Andrew
User avatar
akadiyan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 31 May 2017
Last visit: 20 Jun 2025
Posts: 736
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Products:
Posts: 736
Kudos: 698
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question.
4 Mins to read and take notes and another 4 mins to answer the questions. Got 3 out 4 correct , got the 2nd one incorrect :(
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts can you please chime in on how clear it will be on the actual exam when the question mentions "Line X"? The very first question here mentions line 12 which is the part of the passage that cites multiple studies...I could get the question wrong simply by failing to identify what line the question is referring to.

I also think some of the answers to two of the questions are blasphemy. See my reasoning for the primary purpose...I would argue that yes there was some reconciliation happening...we understand better why the two studies in paragraph one were conflicting via the performance of subsequent studies on advertising.

The passage is primarily concerned with

A. challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products
-challenging is the wrong verb

B. suggesting new marketing strategies for attracting consumers to new products
-new marketing strategies is blatantly incorrect

C. reconciling two different views about the effect of price on consumers’ willingness to try new products
-Correct: the two views are found in the first paragraph, one view is that high price reduces consumer’s perception of performance risk and the other view suggests that price has little/no effect. Subsequent studies shed light on the impact of advertising presentation/manufacturer credibility on this relationship.

D. describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products
-no…new approaches to researching is blatantly incorrect

E. discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products
-this is a pedestrian and non-complex view of the passage

I also thought that the weakener question was fishy...although I got the correct answer...the first choice compares two groups of consumers...if we were to show the same group of consumers products with low prices and find that, that perception was the same when they were shown the same products priced more expensively then yes we would have a weakener...

Which of the following, if true, would most tend to weaken the conclusions drawn from “some of this research” (see line 8)?

A. In a subsequent study, consumers who were asked to evaluate new products with relatively low prices had the same perception of the products’ performance risk as did consumers who were shown the same products priced more expensively.

Correct, remember that the conclusion from that study was high price reduces a consumer’s perception of risk. Cause and effect. So if consumers who view products with low prices had the same perception as those shown the same products priced higher than this weakens…cause is removed.

B. In a subsequent study, the quality of the advertising for the products that consumers perceived as having a lower performance risk was relatively high, while the quality of the advertising for the products that consumers perceived as having a higher performance risk was relatively poor.
-quality of advertising was not part of this study

C. In a subsequent study, the products that consumers perceived as having a lower performance risk were priced higher than the highest priced products in the previous research.
-no…incorrect

D. None of the consumers involved in this research had ever before bought products from the manufacturers involved in the research.
-no…where’s this mention of people buying products for the first time…it’s nowhere.

E. Researchers found that the higher the source credibility for a product, the more consumers were willing to pay for it.
-credibility was not part of this research
User avatar
GMATRockstar
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
793
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 90
Kudos: 793
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A video explanation for Question #415, the first Detail question for this passage:

User avatar
wishmasterdj
Joined: 04 May 2016
Last visit: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 91
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
Experts can you please chime in on how clear it will be on the actual exam when the question mentions "Line X"? The very first question here mentions line 12 which is the part of the passage that cites multiple studies...I could get the question wrong simply by failing to identify what line the question is referring to.

I also think some of the answers to two of the questions are blasphemy. See my reasoning for the primary purpose...I would argue that yes there was some reconciliation happening...we understand better why the two studies in paragraph one were conflicting via the performance of subsequent studies on advertising.

The passage is primarily concerned with

A. challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products
-challenging is the wrong verb

B. suggesting new marketing strategies for attracting consumers to new products
-new marketing strategies is blatantly incorrect

C. reconciling two different views about the effect of price on consumers’ willingness to try new products
-Correct: the two views are found in the first paragraph, one view is that high price reduces consumer’s perception of performance risk and the other view suggests that price has little/no effect. Subsequent studies shed light on the impact of advertising presentation/manufacturer credibility on this relationship.

D. describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products
-no…new approaches to researching is blatantly incorrect

E. discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products
-this is a pedestrian and non-complex view of the passage

I also thought that the weakener question was fishy...although I got the correct answer...the first choice compares two groups of consumers...if we were to show the same group of consumers products with low prices and find that, that perception was the same when they were shown the same products priced more expensively then yes we would have a weakener...

Which of the following, if true, would most tend to weaken the conclusions drawn from “some of this research” (see line 8)?

A. In a subsequent study, consumers who were asked to evaluate new products with relatively low prices had the same perception of the products’ performance risk as did consumers who were shown the same products priced more expensively.

Correct, remember that the conclusion from that study was high price reduces a consumer’s perception of risk. Cause and effect. So if consumers who view products with low prices had the same perception as those shown the same products priced higher than this weakens…cause is removed.

B. In a subsequent study, the quality of the advertising for the products that consumers perceived as having a lower performance risk was relatively high, while the quality of the advertising for the products that consumers perceived as having a higher performance risk was relatively poor.
-quality of advertising was not part of this study

C. In a subsequent study, the products that consumers perceived as having a lower performance risk were priced higher than the highest priced products in the previous research.
-no…incorrect

D. None of the consumers involved in this research had ever before bought products from the manufacturers involved in the research.
-no…where’s this mention of people buying products for the first time…it’s nowhere.

E. Researchers found that the higher the source credibility for a product, the more consumers were willing to pay for it.
-credibility was not part of this research


I agree with your reasoning in Q3. In fact, I used the exact same argument to mark C.

GMATNinja Can you please help clarify this? Also, if you could give some cues on where 'reconcile' may be more valid? Thanks!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


wishmasterdj
CEdward
Experts can you please chime in on how clear it will be on the actual exam when the question mentions "Line X"? The very first question here mentions line 12 which is the part of the passage that cites multiple studies...I could get the question wrong simply by failing to identify what line the question is referring to.

I also think some of the answers to two of the questions are blasphemy. See my reasoning for the primary purpose...I would argue that yes there was some reconciliation happening...we understand better why the two studies in paragraph one were conflicting via the performance of subsequent studies on advertising.

The passage is primarily concerned with

A. challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products
-challenging is the wrong verb

B. suggesting new marketing strategies for attracting consumers to new products
-new marketing strategies is blatantly incorrect

C. reconciling two different views about the effect of price on consumers’ willingness to try new products
-Correct: the two views are found in the first paragraph, one view is that high price reduces consumer’s perception of performance risk and the other view suggests that price has little/no effect. Subsequent studies shed light on the impact of advertising presentation/manufacturer credibility on this relationship.

D. describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products
-no…new approaches to researching is blatantly incorrect

E. discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products
-this is a pedestrian and non-complex view of the passage


I agree with your reasoning in Q3. In fact, I used the exact same argument to mark C.

GMATNinja Can you please help clarify this? Also, if you could give some cues on where 'reconcile' may be more valid? Thanks!
The problem is that the passage is not primarily concerned with the impact of price on consumers’ willingness to try new products. While the first paragraph focuses on price, the second paragraph is focused on manufacturer credibility. It merely mentions price at the end of the paragraph to show how source credibility alone does not account for perceived performance risk. So, the passage as a whole is not primarily concerned with the price.

Moreover, “to reconcile” means to make or show to be compatible. The two views you mentioned cannot be compatible and thus cannot be reconciled. Either price reduces perception of performance risk, or it has little/no effect. It cannot be that price both reduces and has little/no effect on perception of performance risk. Perhaps, as the passage indicates, price and other factors interact to impact perception of performance risk. But that does not reconcile the two views. Rather, it presents a third, alternative view.

I hope that helps!
avatar
noellee
Joined: 12 Apr 2021
Last visit: 21 Oct 2023
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi experts~
we can see the 3rd question's explain on OG(main idea): "it then defines one such motivating factor-perception of performance risk."
i just want to ask why…plzzz
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 811
Kudos: 872
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi bm2201 when you have a bit of time would you mind formatting the passage please. Its driving me nuts!
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,310
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnirudhaS
hi bm2201 when you have a bit of time would you mind formatting the passage please. Its driving me nuts!

I am not sure what problem you are facing but if the passage lines and line numbers are being distorted in your view please decrease the zoom level to 90% in your chrome setting and Let me know if it solves the problem.
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 811
Kudos: 872
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
AnirudhaS
hi bm2201 when you have a bit of time would you mind formatting the passage please. Its driving me nuts!

I am not sure what problem you are facing but if the passage lines and line numbers are being distorted in your view please decrease the zoom level to 90% in your chrome setting and Let me know if it solves the problem.
Thanks, I did not do anything but now it looks perfect. Probably some weird bug!
avatar
RaevMayfly
Joined: 02 Sep 2020
Last visit: 01 Jul 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V39
Posts: 9
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm still confused in Q3. I chose option C because in line 14 it says:
Quote:
These conflicting findings may simply be due to the nature of product advertisements: a recent...
In my understanding, the main discussion was between two opposing theories on price vs performance risk and advertising was only used to reconcile these theories. Ads weren't the main consideration of the argument (as is mentioned in E)
Please help.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


RaevMayfly
I'm still confused in Q3. I chose option C because in line 14 it says:
Quote:
These conflicting findings may simply be due to the nature of product advertisements: a recent...
In my understanding, the main discussion was between two opposing theories on price vs performance risk and advertising was only used to reconcile these theories. Ads weren't the main consideration of the argument (as is mentioned in E)
Please help.
While (C) may be an adequate description of the first paragraph, it really doesn’t capture the author’s primary purpose in the second paragraph. In the second paragraph, the author proceeds to investigate manufacturer credibility, and (C) does not address that.

Check out this post and this post for more on (C), and let us know if you have any further questions!
User avatar
Dinesh654
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello experts,

I got stuck in question 3 primary purpose between A and E

heres how I interpreted paras-

first para- author presents what motivates consumer to try new products

1 study- price effects- PPR (perception)
while another study- price has less or no effect on PPR - challanging previos study

2nd para-
study- source's credibility effects- PPR
but another study - source credibility's effect is complex; its price+credibility effects - PPR (again some how challanging)

therefore I chose A

challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products

however in E

discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products

but passage is talking about- what motivation consumers trying new products- is it price or advertisement or source. Why consumer try new product is vague and not related

where I am wrong?
please explain!
Thanks
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
536
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcoolguy
Hello experts,

I got stuck in question 3 primary purpose between A and E

heres how I interpreted paras-

first para- author presents what motivates consumer to try new products

1 study- price effects- PPR (perception)
while another study- price has less or no effect on PPR - challanging previos study

2nd para-
study- source's credibility effects- PPR
but another study - source credibility's effect is complex; its price+credibility effects - PPR (again some how challanging)

therefore I chose A

challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products

however in E

discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products

but passage is talking about- what motivation consumers trying new products- is it price or advertisement or source. Why consumer try new product is vague and not related

where I am wrong?
please explain!
Thanks

Forget what the passage says for a moment.

Read answer choice A on its own:


A. [The passage is primarily concerned with] challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products.

Write out, in your own words, without thinking about this actual passage, what a passage would look like if this were its primary concern.

(please do this--it will be better for you to try it yourself before reading on).

Here's what I would expect to see in such a passage:

The passage would lay out research on why consumers try to new products. It would then lay out what some people have determined that research implies--meaning, some people would suggest that the research tells us something more--something we should do, know, consider, or try--then what the research itself showed. (E.g. Imagine research that found out that too much sugar is bad for you, and someone suggested this means the government should severely limit the amount of sugar allowed it foods). This passage would then challenge these implications. It would question whether the research really implies what some people are arguing the research implies.

Compare my summary to yours. Where are they similar? Where are they different? Is there certain word I latched onto in the answer that you paid less attention to?

Determine whose 'idea' for what the passage would be in order to justify choosing 'A' is most correct, or rewrite your own that you think captures the idea best.

Now do a similar thing for E:

E. [The passage is primary concerned with] discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products.

My summary is something like:

The passage would lay out several different studies that researched why consumers try new products, and what their findings were.

Now reread the passage.

Does it, in fact, challenge the implications of of previous research?

Or does it, perhaps, simply lay out what the research was?
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For question 476 (which of the following, if true, would most tend to weaken the conclusions drawn from "some of this research" (line 8)), I had a tough time with figuring out where to stop given that the sentence still continued past line 8 in which it then expressed a conflicting view in the same sentence.

How did you know/why did the GMAT expect you to know that "some of this research" just referred to "some of this research has concluded that a relatively high price will reduce a consumer's perception of the performance risk associated with purchasing a particular product" and to not incorporate what follows "while other studies have reported that price has little or no effect on perceived performance risk" ?

Thank you!
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts