Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Dec 1511:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Dec 1608:00 AM PST
-11:59 PM PST
GMAT Club 12 Days of Christmas is a 4th Annual GMAT Club Winter Competition based on solving questions. This is the Winter GMAT competition on GMAT Club with an amazing opportunity to win over $40,000 worth of prizes!- Dec 17
09:00 AM PST
-10:00 AM PST
Join Manhattan Prep instructor Whitney Garner for a fun—and thorough—review of logic-based (non-math) problems, with a particular emphasis on Data Sufficiency and Two-Parts. - Dec 18
10:00 AM PST
-11:00 AM PST
Here is the essential guide to securing scholarships as an MBA student! In this video, we explore the various types of scholarships available, including need-based and merit-based options.
03 Jan 2017, 05:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi everyone! I have 1 week left until GMAT and just did my first AWA. Would be very grateful for any suggestions for improvement or even an estimation of score for it.
Cheers,
Fredrik
Argument:
My answer:
The author claims that President Leonard must be recalled because of economic stagnation which is assumed to be attributed to the president. This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions actually are the cause of the economic stagnation, which is not obvious from the argument. Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises, making it unconvincing.
First, it is implied that the above average unemployment rate is the fault of the president. While it could be the case that he has made decisions that caused the unemployment rate to rise, there is certainly not any convincing proof that it would be so. The high unemployment rate might be a consequence of various different factors. For instance, there could be a global recession, causing economic stagnation worldwide. It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed. Without any clear link between the actions of the president and the unemployment rate, the argument remains flawed.
Second, the author uses the fact that the approval rating of the president is below 50% as a reason to recall him to get the citizens back to employment. Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument. In fact, it is not uncommon that the people feel unsatisfied with their current conditions, falsely attributing their situation to their current leader and therefore disapprove him. Also, the low approval rating does not necessarily need to be caused by high unemployment rate, but could be due to other policies that the president has introduced.
Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons. The author draws a conclusion that the president must be recalled because of the current bad economic conditions, without any clear evidence that the president actually has caused the economic stagnation. To make the argument more convincing, the author could have provided examples of actions that the president has done to cause the increase in unemployment. He could also have given evidence linking the approval rating to specific choices made by the president. Without clearer evidence of causality between the president and the economic conditions, one cannot be sure that he is the cause the problems and the argument remains unconvincing.
Cheers,
Fredrik
Argument:
Quote:
The following letter to the editor appeared in the Coastal Times:
It has become clear that President Leonard needs to be recalled. His approval rating is down below 50% and the unemployment rate is well above its historical average. While I agree with his handling of the recent international conflicts, we simply cannot afford such stagnant economic growth. We must recall President Leonard in order to put our neighbors back to work!
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
It has become clear that President Leonard needs to be recalled. His approval rating is down below 50% and the unemployment rate is well above its historical average. While I agree with his handling of the recent international conflicts, we simply cannot afford such stagnant economic growth. We must recall President Leonard in order to put our neighbors back to work!
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
My answer:
The author claims that President Leonard must be recalled because of economic stagnation which is assumed to be attributed to the president. This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions actually are the cause of the economic stagnation, which is not obvious from the argument. Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises, making it unconvincing.
First, it is implied that the above average unemployment rate is the fault of the president. While it could be the case that he has made decisions that caused the unemployment rate to rise, there is certainly not any convincing proof that it would be so. The high unemployment rate might be a consequence of various different factors. For instance, there could be a global recession, causing economic stagnation worldwide. It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed. Without any clear link between the actions of the president and the unemployment rate, the argument remains flawed.
Second, the author uses the fact that the approval rating of the president is below 50% as a reason to recall him to get the citizens back to employment. Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument. In fact, it is not uncommon that the people feel unsatisfied with their current conditions, falsely attributing their situation to their current leader and therefore disapprove him. Also, the low approval rating does not necessarily need to be caused by high unemployment rate, but could be due to other policies that the president has introduced.
Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons. The author draws a conclusion that the president must be recalled because of the current bad economic conditions, without any clear evidence that the president actually has caused the economic stagnation. To make the argument more convincing, the author could have provided examples of actions that the president has done to cause the increase in unemployment. He could also have given evidence linking the approval rating to specific choices made by the president. Without clearer evidence of causality between the president and the economic conditions, one cannot be sure that he is the cause the problems and the argument remains unconvincing.
04 Jan 2017, 20:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think you need to allocate some time towards the end to remove any grammatical mistakes. I will point out the more obvious ones -
"This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions" - I think you meant "based on the belief that". You need an apostrophe here - "Leonard's".
"Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises" - remove the "is".
"It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed." - "whose" refers to the previous President.
"Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument." - It is not clear what you are trying to say. Perhaps, you could simplify the sentence.
"Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons." - Not clear what you are trying to do here. this sentence seems to imply that several more reasons follow, but then none do.
You can also add more points to your essay argument. You do not need to include all of them. Try to challenge each sentence -
An approval rating below 50% is not necessarily dire. What was the average approval rating of previous presidents? Probably the current President's rating is much higher than the historical average.
Unemployment rate is not the only indicator of economic stagnation. What if his performance on other economic indicators are stellar?
What if international conflicts caused the unemployment rate to be higher than average? Probably companies in conflict zones that outsource jobs shut down
What if the unemployment rate would have much higher than it is now if someone else were the President? He probably brought it down to its current levels. It would have been much higher otherwise.
What if the unemployment rate has reduced from its previous high during the tenure of the previous President? (even though the unemployment rate is higher than its historical average)
What if there are no qualified candidates for the Presidency? What if other candidates make the situation even worse?
Are there are positive signs of improvement in the economy? If there are, then it seems that his policies are working.
What if the Senate and the House are responsible for economic stagnation?
What if recalling the President results in power vacuum and make the situation even worse?
"This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions" - I think you meant "based on the belief that". You need an apostrophe here - "Leonard's".
"Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises" - remove the "is".
"It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed." - "whose" refers to the previous President.
"Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument." - It is not clear what you are trying to say. Perhaps, you could simplify the sentence.
"Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons." - Not clear what you are trying to do here. this sentence seems to imply that several more reasons follow, but then none do.
You can also add more points to your essay argument. You do not need to include all of them. Try to challenge each sentence -
An approval rating below 50% is not necessarily dire. What was the average approval rating of previous presidents? Probably the current President's rating is much higher than the historical average.
Unemployment rate is not the only indicator of economic stagnation. What if his performance on other economic indicators are stellar?
What if international conflicts caused the unemployment rate to be higher than average? Probably companies in conflict zones that outsource jobs shut down
What if the unemployment rate would have much higher than it is now if someone else were the President? He probably brought it down to its current levels. It would have been much higher otherwise.
What if the unemployment rate has reduced from its previous high during the tenure of the previous President? (even though the unemployment rate is higher than its historical average)
What if there are no qualified candidates for the Presidency? What if other candidates make the situation even worse?
Are there are positive signs of improvement in the economy? If there are, then it seems that his policies are working.
What if the Senate and the House are responsible for economic stagnation?
What if recalling the President results in power vacuum and make the situation even worse?
05 Jan 2017, 07:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
CrackVerbalGMAT
I think you need to allocate some time towards the end to remove any grammatical mistakes. I will point out the more obvious ones -
"This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions" - I think you meant "based on the belief that". You need an apostrophe here - "Leonard's".
"Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises" - remove the "is".
"It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed." - "whose" refers to the previous President.
"Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument." - It is not clear what you are trying to say. Perhaps, you could simplify the sentence.
"Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons." - Not clear what you are trying to do here. this sentence seems to imply that several more reasons follow, but then none do.
You can also add more points to your essay argument. You do not need to include all of them. Try to challenge each sentence -
An approval rating below 50% is not necessarily dire. What was the average approval rating of previous presidents? Probably the current President's rating is much higher than the historical average.
Unemployment rate is not the only indicator of economic stagnation. What if his performance on other economic indicators are stellar?
What if international conflicts caused the unemployment rate to be higher than average? Probably companies in conflict zones that outsource jobs shut down
What if the unemployment rate would have much higher than it is now if someone else were the President? He probably brought it down to its current levels. It would have been much higher otherwise.
What if the unemployment rate has reduced from its previous high during the tenure of the previous President? (even though the unemployment rate is higher than its historical average)
What if there are no qualified candidates for the Presidency? What if other candidates make the situation even worse?
Are there are positive signs of improvement in the economy? If there are, then it seems that his policies are working.
What if the Senate and the House are responsible for economic stagnation?
What if recalling the President results in power vacuum and make the situation even worse?
"This conclusion is based on that President Leonards actions" - I think you meant "based on the belief that". You need an apostrophe here - "Leonard's".
"Therefore, the conclusion is relies on weak premises" - remove the "is".
"It could also have been caused by the actions of the previous president, whose effects are delayed." - "whose" refers to the previous President.
"Even though the low approval rate could be caused by actions done by the president, perhaps an increase in minimum wage, which could have reinforced the unemployment rate, it is not at all obvious from the argument." - It is not clear what you are trying to say. Perhaps, you could simplify the sentence.
"Finally, this argument is flawed for several reasons." - Not clear what you are trying to do here. this sentence seems to imply that several more reasons follow, but then none do.
You can also add more points to your essay argument. You do not need to include all of them. Try to challenge each sentence -
An approval rating below 50% is not necessarily dire. What was the average approval rating of previous presidents? Probably the current President's rating is much higher than the historical average.
Unemployment rate is not the only indicator of economic stagnation. What if his performance on other economic indicators are stellar?
What if international conflicts caused the unemployment rate to be higher than average? Probably companies in conflict zones that outsource jobs shut down
What if the unemployment rate would have much higher than it is now if someone else were the President? He probably brought it down to its current levels. It would have been much higher otherwise.
What if the unemployment rate has reduced from its previous high during the tenure of the previous President? (even though the unemployment rate is higher than its historical average)
What if there are no qualified candidates for the Presidency? What if other candidates make the situation even worse?
Are there are positive signs of improvement in the economy? If there are, then it seems that his policies are working.
What if the Senate and the House are responsible for economic stagnation?
What if recalling the President results in power vacuum and make the situation even worse?
Thanks a lot for the thorough answer! Definitely going to re-read my answer more carefully next time and also to expand my points.
