The passage describes a negative feedback loop for carbon regulation:
When carbon increases: ↑ Carbon → ↑ Heat → ↑ Evaporation → ↑ Rain → ↑ Carbon washed into oceans → ↓ Carbon
When carbon decreases: ↓ Carbon → ↓ Heat → ↓ Evaporation → ↓ Rain → ↓ Carbon washed into oceans → ↑ Carbon
Evaluating The Answer Choices(A) A decrease in atmospheric heat causes less carbon to be washed into the oceans.
The passage states: decreased heat → decreased evaporation → decreased rain → less carbon washed into oceans. This can be inferred.
(B) An increase in atmospheric carbon causes increased evaporation.
The passage states: increased carbon → increased heat → increased evaporation. This can be inferred (carbon increase causes heat increase, which causes evaporation increase).
(C) An increase in atmospheric heat causes increased rainfall.
The passage states: increased heat → increased evaporation → increased rain. This can be inferred.
(D) A decrease in atmospheric carbon causes decreased evaporation.
The passage states: decreased carbon → decreased heat → decreased evaporation. This can be inferred.
(E) A decrease in atmospheric heat causes a decrease in atmospheric carbon.
Here's the problem: The passage establishes that carbon drives heat, not the reverse.
The causal chain runs: Carbon → Heat → Evaporation → Rain → Carbon removed
If heat decreases independently, the passage doesn't tell us what happens to carbon levels
In fact, the described mechanism suggests that less heat would mean less rain, which would mean less carbon washed away, potentially leading to carbon increasing (not decreasing)
The passage never establishes heat as a cause of carbon levels—only as an effect. Choice (E) reverses the causal direction.
Answer: (E)
This is the exception because it cannot be inferred from the passage. The passage describes carbon affecting heat, not heat independently affecting carbon levels.