Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 23:23 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 23:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vivek_dj
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 337
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Geethu
Joined: 05 May 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 279
Own Kudos:
Location: Aus
Posts: 279
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
new1975
Joined: 21 May 2003
Last visit: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vivek_dj
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 337
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is (C).
The original sentence (A) contains a misplaced modifying phrase (following the comma). The sentence's construction suggests that it is the electorate that cannot reasonably be disputed, although this makes little sense in the context of the sentence as a whole.

(B) suffers from a confusing syntax. It appears from the sentence's construction that the elected officials - rather than the fact that they ignored their electorate's wishes - cannot be disputed. (B) also misplaces the prepositional phrase "on this issue" between the gerund "ignoring" and the object of that gerund, "the wishes of the electorate."

(C) remedies the underlined phrase's faulty construction by rephrasing it as a noun clause.

(D) improperly uses a comma between two clauses that do not constitute independent sentences on their own. (D) also sets up a parallel between "were ignoredтАа" and "cannot reasonably." Both phrases seem to refer to "the wishes of the electorate," although this is probably not the intended meaning.

(E) is the second-best response; it corrects the misplaced-modifier problem in the original version. In two respects, however, (E) is not as effective a sentence as (C). First, in (E) it is less clear that the modifying phrase "on this issue" refers to the wishes of the electorate. Second, (E) employs the passive voice ("wishes...were ignored by...officials") rather than the preferred active voice ("officials ignored the wishes...").

Vivek.
User avatar
Dharmin
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Last visit: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 209
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Either "B" or "C" depends on single truth as,

Who can be disputed ?
The state's elected offcials (B)
or
The fact that "the officials ignored the wishes of their electorates" ? (C)

"D" seems not correct due to "and" at the end....

I think "C" is the correct..

A is wrong bcoz of i think repetative use of "this"

Please post your thoughts on the same..

Dharmin



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
Current Student
278 posts