Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score.
The Easter Bunny brings … the first day of school?? Yes! Now is the time to start studying for the GMAT if you’re planning to apply to Round 1 of fall MBA programs. Get a special discount with the Easter sale!
$84 + an extra $10 off for the first month of EMPOWERgmat access. Train to be ready for Round 3 Deadlines with EMPOWERgmat's Score Booster. Ends April 21st Code: GCENHANCED
What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips, and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. Save your spot today!
Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Dec 2005, 09:58
2
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
65% (hard)
Question Stats:
37% (01:07) correct 63% (01:11) wrong based on 168 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America's most enduring writers and a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s, will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books.
A. will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. B. is publishing hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. C. would have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. D. will publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. E. would publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books.
Coming to current problem, first part is in past. Hence next part should be conditional Here, both WOULD HAVE and WOULD are conditional Yet there is a difference: Would have is used for the past which never happened. Eg- if John had eaten pizza yesterday, he would have fell ill. Note here that John didn't eat pizza in fact.
Would is used when we know it has happened, as in present case. John, who ate pizza yesterday, would become ill. Here it's past+conditional.
The best answer is E. Choices A, B and D use tenses that can only be used for the living. Hughes, the subject of the sentence, is deceased, as is evidenced by the sentence. Choice C sets up a condition would have published... but the condition is then not specified.
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring wri
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Sep 2007, 04:57
1
This is E. It's difficult to explain why.
A, B & D have to be wrong because of the tense (Hughes is dead, so everything is in the past, not present or future).
C - "Would have published" begs an "if" clause - it suggests that he didn't actually publish
"Would publish" actually has the force of past perfect, it means the same as "Did publish" and would be used in a certain type of formal writing. Sorry I can't give you a more "grammary" explanation, but I'm sure this is right.
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2012, 09:00
3
Straight E. That answer option uses the right tense to indicate that something that has already happened, is being anticipated to occur as if it hasn't happened. The word "would" fulfills this bill.
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4690
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2012, 23:36
2
1
To understand this topic in its right perspective, please travel with me to the beginning of the Hughes’s life-span of 65 years and look at the events from there A. 65 years is deep in the past and hence we need a past tense related verb and the use of will have published, a future perfect tense is inappropriate. B. Is publishing is also wrong for the same reasons as in A C. Would have published is sheer speculation as though, a correct count could not be taken even at the end of the 65- year tenure. incorrect D. Will publish does not go well with the pastness E. Would publish gives the picture of a report, because, starting from the beginning, the tense indicates a factual factor. correct choice
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4690
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2012, 03:11
2
Here the text wants to assert that Hughes has published a certain number of things. ‘Would publish’, a past future tense of ‘will publish’ does that job neatly. On the contrary, ‘would have published’ leaves us with an uncertainty whether he did publish at all so many. This element of speculation makes C inferior.
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2012, 03:24
1
over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America's most enduring writers and a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s, will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books.
A. will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. B. is publishing hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. C. would have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. D. will publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books. E. would publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children's books.
lets start the elimination process. A - Can not because will have denotes something in the future but sentence says -Over his 65 years - means the its about past tense. So - Eliminate B and D.
Now Out of C & E, E is a conditional sentence - Would publish.... that can be said for future work as well. So only Option left is C and that is the best answer. .
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4690
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2012, 08:39
Google for modal verbs, among which would is one. Many sites have writings on the use of would, acting as a future tense of will in indirect speech, and as a subjunctive mood auxiliary verb in hypothetical cases.
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of Americas most
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Sep 2013, 04:07
3
There is big confusion between C and E.
As per the intended meaning: There are some works that Hughes did repeatedly in his 65-years of life span.
Would Vs Would have: C: Hughes would have published X, Y, Z. Means If something had happened Hughes would have published. This is not the author wants to convey.
E: Hughes would publish X,Y,Z. Means: In his life span of 65 years Hughes published X,Y,Z repeatedly. Supporting Doc: "Would" is most commonly used to create conditional verb forms. It also serves as the past form of the modal verb "will." Additionally, "would" can indicate repetition in the past. Examples: If he were an actor, he would be in adventure movies. conditional I knew that she would be very successful in her career. past of "will" When they first met, they would always have picnics on the beach. repetition
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring wri
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Mar 2017, 00:10
johnycute wrote:
Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring writers and a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920’s, will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books. A. will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books. B. is publishing hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books. C. would have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books. D. will publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books. E. would publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
Good Question.
Doubt should be between C and E.
C is only incorrect because it posses a half conditional. E is the best.
_________________
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 542
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring wri
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2017, 07:19
1
sarathgopinath wrote:
Why is C wrong? Please help
Hi Sara,
(C) is wrong because of the use of the word 'have'. This changes the meaning of the sentence. (E) states: Would [go on to] publish; whereas (C) states: Would have [gone on to] publish. This changes the meaning and makes it sound like the author didn't publish his books during his life because of some reason.
Re: Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring wri
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2019, 07:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
37% (01:07) correct 
