Official Explanation
The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids have existed for so long, though inseparable from one another.
A. aphids have existed for so long, though inseparable
B. aphids has existed for so long but are not inseparable
C. aphids, has existed for so long that they are inseparable
D. aphids—has existed for so long but they are not separable
E. also aphids, for so long has existed not inseparable
After a quick glance, it’s clear that there are several differences we can focus on here, but let’s narrow it down to just a couple differences to start:
1. have existed vs. has existed (Verb Tense)
2. though inseparable / but are not inseparable / that they are inseparable / but they are not separable / not inseparable (Structure & Meaning)
While it might be tempting to start with #1 because it’s an either/or split, look closely – it’s a 4-to-1 split. Odds are, you won’t eliminate 4 options based on something as simple as a verb choice. Instead, let’s tackle #2, which has to do with structure.
If we look closely at the original sentence, it appears to use a non-essential clause to give an example of a symbiotic relationship (a type of bacteria and aphids). We need to make sure this non-essential clause can be removed without creating a sentence fragment or run-on. To make problems easier to spot, let’s add in the non-underlined portions.
A. The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids have existed for so long, though inseparable from one another.
This is INCORRECT because, if we remove the non-essential clause that’s bookended with commas, we’re left with a sentence fragment. This means that the verb (have existed) was accidentally included in the non-essential clause! Also, the plural verb “have existed” doesn’t match the singular subject “relationship.”
B. The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids has existed for so long but are not inseparable from one another.
This is INCORRECT because the writer forgot the put the comma after “aphids,” which would have closed off the non-essential clause. Now we’re left with a subject and one very long -ing modifier that is worded awkwardly and also swallowed up our verb!
C. The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids, has existed for so long that they are inseparable from one another.
Here is our CORRECT choice! If we remove the non-essential clause (including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids), what we’re left with is still a complete sentence.
D. The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and aphids—has existed for so long but they are not separable from one another.
This is INCORRECT because, whenever we add in a non-essential clause, the punctuation before and after need to match. You could use commas or hyphens – but you cannot use both.
E. The symbiotic relationship of some animal species, including the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola and also aphids, for so long has existed not inseparable from one another.
This is INCORRECT for a couple reasons. First, saying “and also” is not necessary – it’s overly wordy. Second, even if we take out the non-essential clause, we have a meaning problem. By using the double-negative “not inseparable,” the meaning is fundamentally changed. This is saying that symbiotic species are actually separate from each other, which is NOT the meaning we’re trying to convey! Option C clearly shows that species that are in a symbiotic relationship are inseparable, which makes much more sense.
There you have it – option C is our winner!
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.