dave13
hi
generis, though D is correct answer do you feel the way the sentence is structured is okay ? i mean the style
Normally when i hear "because" in conversations ... i expect and I hear
something before
because .... "because' mostly is proceeded by some words e.g. "i dont like pizza with mushrooms because i dont like mushrooms"
i think in spoken language i emphasize more on the inner meaning of my thoughts rather than grammatical aspects
Because
the acai berry’s antioxidants boost immune cell function more effectively than those in almost any other fruit, it is one of the healthiest fruits that is widely available
dave13 , you ask a good question.
I imagine that "because" at the beginning of a sentence sounds odd because that construction is fairly rare in spoken and informally written English.
In language, familiarity does not breed contempt. In language, familiarity breeds comfort.
You have a good ear. "Because" may sound a little odd at first, but its use is effective:
Because I am a woman, I must make unusual efforts to succeed. If I fail, no one will say, "She doesn't have what it takes,"' They will say, "Women don't have what it takes."-- Claire Booth Luce
Finally, how we understand causality in any language ranks near the top in "important areas to master."
• How AND, BUT, and OR -- and BECAUSE -- got banished for no reason
Very often native English speakers (and perhaps non-native speakers) encounter at least one teacher who announces that sentences must never begin with conjunctions.
The "rule" pertains to the coordinating conjunctions AND, BUT, and OR.
No such rule exists, although its contents still circulate.
The Chicago Manual of Style calls this rule a "myth."Good writers have always ignored the non-rule.
Despite the fact that "because" is a subordinating and not a coordinating conjunction, "because" was also banished to the Land of Words that Should Never Begin a Sentence.
Yep. We were taught not to begin sentences with "because."
That prohibition also still circulates.
There is no such rule about "because," either. There is not even a "stylistic preference" for the placement of because.
GMAT?
A quick and informal survey indicates that GMAC includes at least one question that starts with
because in its OGs and Verbal Reviews.
• Verbal Review 2018, SC 229 (collagen fibers);
• 2012 OG (13th edition): SC 33 (oversupply of computer chips) and SC 115 (maritime provisions)
• 2016 OG: SC 67 (oversupply of computer chips) and SC 115 (maritime provisions)
• 2018 OG SC 779 (maritime provisions)
In answer to your question: I think it is well-constructed to test the concept.
Try rewriting the sentence without that structure. See whether you can construct a sentence as efficient as that one with all those words.
One takeaway: If you see "because" begin a sentence, be prepared to assess whether there is a subordinate clause (because ABC)
and a main clause (X happened or Y is true).
Another takeaway: Some sentences are richer with "because" at the beginning. This is one of those sentences ("think" it in English, a suggestion that sounds absurd, but I believe you will understand):
Because we have little use for history, and because we refuse the comforts of a society established on the blueprint of class privilege, we find ourselves set adrift at birth in an existential void, inheriting nothing except the obligation to construct a plausible self . . . -- Lewis H. Lapham,
Who and What is an American?"Because" at the beginning makes the last phrase strike with eerily beautiful force: "inheriting nothing except the obligation to construct a plausible self."
Final takeaway: the unfamiliarity of the construction caught many people asleep on the issue of meaning, particularly with respect to the issue of absurd causality in A, B, and C. Heads up, everyone.