GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2019, 04:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58327
Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2019, 22:44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

78% (01:40) correct 22% (02:16) wrong based on 89 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Competition Mode Question



Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged by another nation should demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin. If all countries behaved according to this method, countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations.

The professor's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?

A. No country truly acts in accordance with this method of international conflict resolution.

B. In conflict resolution, no country should announce conditions for negotiations.

C. International conflicts should be settled by an objective international third party.

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations.

E. Countries place conditions on negotiation so that those negotiations might ultimately be successful.

_________________
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 597
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
WE: Project Management (Investment Banking)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2019, 23:14
1
Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged by another nation should demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin. If all countries behaved according to this method, countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations.

The professor's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
The professor states that "demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin"
If this were true then countries should have agreed to all conditions before negotiations however prof assumes that "countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations" . hence he assumes ha countries in discussion never agree on other country's demand before beginning negotiation.

A. No country truly acts in accordance with this method of international conflict resolution.This actualy weakens is argument

B. In conflict resolution, no country should announce conditions for negotiations.No impact

C. International conflicts should be settled by an objective international third party.Out of scope. Prof doesnt say so

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations.Thsi fills in the correct gap

E. Countries place conditions on negotiation so that those negotiations might ultimately be successful.It doest have an impact on begining negotiations
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Status: Whatever it takes!
Joined: 10 Oct 2018
Posts: 381
GPA: 4
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2019, 23:29
1
Oh an easy one!
Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged by another nation should demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin. If all countries behaved according to this method, countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations.

The professor's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?

Before attempting assumption questions, it is important to jot down the para in points. This method makes it very easy to answer.

Premise: one C X by another C, wrong C must meet conditions first (C=countries)
Assumption: ?
Conclusion: This methodology would never help C succeeding in beginning negotiations.

assumption could be that no country would ever agree with another country's allegations or conditions which will be followed by fights, arguments etc and because of all these, countries could never succeed in advance of beginning negotiations.

A. No country truly acts in accordance with this method of international conflict resolution.
INCORRECT. Pretty much a good candidate for a contender. But then this assumption has no relation with beginning negotiations. Still feeling doubt then do negate this sentence. If all countries act in this method of international conflict, then the problem continues. The misunderstanding would exists and argument is unaffected.

B. In conflict resolution, no country should announce conditions for negotiations.
INCORRECT. Even if you negate, it argument is unaffected.

C. International conflicts should be settled by an objective international third party.
INCORRECT. Out of scope.

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations.
CORRECT. matches with our assumption(mentioned above along with reason) and the sentence does have a relation with advance of beginning negotiations (with the conclusion). Negation: If countries in conflict with another country meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations, then no problem would ever exists and every negotiation will move on smoothly. Destroys argument.

E. Countries place conditions on negotiation so that those negotiations might ultimately be successful.
INCORRECT. Same as option A and B
_________________
Kudos OK Please!!

ALL ABOUT GMAT- \(https://exampal.com/gmat/blog/gmat-score-explained\)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 315
Location: India
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V27
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
CAT Tests
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2019, 03:26
1
Premise: For resolving international conflicts victim nation should demand conditions that need to be met by defendant nation before negotiations begin.

Conclusion: If all countries behave in this manner no negotiation would begin between countries.

Argument basis is that negotiations could resolve conflicts but for that negotiations must start first.

A. No country truly acts in accordance with this method of international conflict resolution. – WRONG. This is close. If no country acts according to the method there’s no point in discussing the argument then. Irrelevant.

B. In conflict resolution, no country should announce conditions for negotiations. – WRONG. If countries don’t put conditions at first does argument says countries would be successful in starting negotiations. No, can’t be said.

C. International conflicts should be settled by an objective international third party. – WRONG. Irrelevant.

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations. – CORRECT. If countries meet the demands in advance than argument fails to hold true. Thus correct.

E. Countries place conditions on negotiation so that those negotiations might ultimately be successful. – WRONG. This might be true but it is irrelevant as assumption for argument still remain same.

IMO Answer (D).
_________________
Ephemeral Epiphany..!

GMATPREP1 590(Q48,V23) March 6, 2019
GMATPREP2 610(Q44,V29) June 10, 2019
GMATPREPSoft1 680(Q48,V35) June 26, 2019
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 Aug 2018
Posts: 323
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2019, 06:43
1
IMO it is D. Because it gives the reason that no country will meet conditions in advance and without that negotiations will not start.

Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged by another nation should demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin. If all countries behaved according to this method, countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations.

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations.
_________________
On the way to conquer the GMAT and I will not leave it until I win. WHATEVER IT TAKES.
Target 720+


" I CAN AND I WILL"

Your suggestions will be appreciated here---> https://gmatclub.com/forum/your-one-advice-could-help-me-poor-gmat-scores-299072.html

1) Gmat prep: [620 Q48 V27], 2) Gmat prep: [610 Q47 V28], 3) Gmat prep: [620 Q47 V28],
4) Gmat prep: [660 Q47 V34], 5) Gmat prep: [560 Q37 V29], 6) Gmat prep: [540 Q39 V26],
7) Veritas Cat: [620 Q46 V30], 8) Veritas Cat: [630 Q45 V32], 9) Manhattan:[630 Q41, V35]
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58327
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2019, 22:45
Bunuel wrote:

Competition Mode Question



Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged by another nation should demand that conditions be met by the wrongdoing nation before negotiations between both parties can begin. If all countries behaved according to this method, countries in conflict would never succeed in beginning negotiations.

The professor's argument relies on which of the following assumptions?

A. No country truly acts in accordance with this method of international conflict resolution.

B. In conflict resolution, no country should announce conditions for negotiations.

C. International conflicts should be settled by an objective international third party.

D. No country in conflict with another country will meet any of that country's demands in advance of beginning negotiations.

E. Countries place conditions on negotiation so that those negotiations might ultimately be successful.


Official Explanation



Reading the question: with a quasi-syllogistic argument, this prompt may succumb to term matching. The last sentence is the conclusion. What terms in there are not matched properly to the evidence?

Image

"Beginning negotiations" is properly matched. "This method," while vague on its own, is well matched with a reference on the other side. But "countries at conflict" does not precisely match with "a nation that perceives itself to have been wronged." Those two things are not necessarily the same. For example, the argument appears to assume that all countries in conflict perceive themselves to have been wronged by another nation. We have our filter.

Applying the filter leaves us with (D), which is similar to our filter, as it involves nations being standoffish always.

Logical proof: we can use the negation test. What if countries generally do meet other countries' demands in advance of beginning negotiations? Well, then, the argument would be quite wrong--countries would generally meet each other's demands, and then they would, in fact, start negotiations. The argument breaks if (D) is false; therefore, the argument indeed assumes that (D) is true.

The correct answer is (D).

Attachment:
image026.jpg
image026.jpg [ 10.01 KiB | Viewed 411 times ]

_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio   [#permalink] 02 Sep 2019, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Professor: in one method of international conflict resolution, a natio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne