Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 20:38 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 20:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
gmt1
Joined: 18 May 2015
Last visit: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
338
 [6]
Given Kudos: 123
Posts: 33
Kudos: 338
 [6]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rajeshjainpharma
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
swapyuee
Joined: 10 May 2015
Last visit: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 11
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pavankarwa123
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Last visit: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 27
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swapyuee
Isn't C similar to D ? In C , it says that the authorities could be persuaded to make pollution less of a problem for dolphins.
In D , it says the effect of pollution is not that significant. Is D option preferred because persuading the authorities is kind of a long shot ?

No, the interpretation is quite different here-

Note the subtle difference in two main causes of extinction. The Proposal emphasizes specifically that fishermen turn to other fishing methods because dolphin's food is caught enormously with so-called mosquito nets.

Therefore, in slowing the rate of extinction, anybody has to stress more on the issue of dolphin's food depletion rather than pollution levels. And that is exactly what (D) does.

In contrast, C stresses more on pollution levels.

Does this help?
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 02 Oct 2024
Posts: 6,014
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 6,014
Kudos: 4,948
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmt1
Proposal: The two most formidable threats faced by freshwater dolphins are depletion of their prey by the enormous by-catch of fish in "mosquito" nets and the increase in pollution that reduces freshwater resources. To slow the dolphins' extinction, local fishermen should stop using "mosquito" nets and turn to other fishing methods.

Objection: Any other fishing method requires the use of more motor boats that will inevitably lead to further the increase in pollution and further threaten the dolphins.

Threats of freshwater dolphins -

1. Depletion of their prey
2. Increase in Pollution

To check the problem : Use of any other fishing methods ( more motor boats) will lead to further increase in population.

Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection to the proposal? - Weakening the Conclusion


A. It is impossible for the local fishermen to completely stop using the "mosquito" nets because this would result in financial losses. - Out of scope and completely wrong.

B. Replacing "mosquito" nets with other fishing methods would more than double the amount of fish available for dolphins to consume.

Ok lets accept for the sake of arguement that other fishing methods will increase the amount of fish available for dolphins to consume , but what about the Pollution ?

This statement neither supports nor weakens the conclusion.. - Incorrect

C. With the help of active environmental campaigns, local authorities could be persuaded to build more water purification facilities, thus making pollution less of a problem for dolphins.

Using local authorities..... to build more........thus making pollution less of a problem...........

Completely relying on outside aid , Incorrect.

D. Dolphins suffer significantly more when their food is scarce than when the level of pollution increases.

Scarcity of Food > Pollution....


Pollution is not primary concern for the Dolphins and clearly challenges the Conclusion .

This statement further suggests that use of other fishing method can be introduced without threateniing the Dolphin population...

E. Regardless of whether the food is scarce or abundant, it is unlikely that dolphins will be able to survive if the present rate of pollution increases.

This is a dubious statement having 2 possible effects -

1. If rate of Pollution increases - unlikely that dolphins will be able to survive.

2. If rate of Pollution doesn't increase then ?????? - Will the dolphins survive ?

Based on the above IMO (D)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,989
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,989
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts