Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 12:39 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 12:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4386
Own Kudos [?]: 32883 [16]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 606 [0]
Given Kudos: 1063
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2015
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [2]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Since the real problem is between the difference between the outward and inward funds, it is essential to understand the growth in the number of people in each of those categories. C speaks of that.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 606 [0]
Given Kudos: 1063
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Ok I understand C is the right answer. But what's wrong with E? Is it out of scope or not related to the conclusion?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [3]
Given Kudos: 61
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Answer is C
The author assumes that social security contributors will be outnumbered soon by recipient and hence there is need of privatization.
This argument is only valid if there is possibility of such event.

C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future
If Ans is Yes for near future, then privatization needed.
If Ans is No for near future, then keep the existing system.

Kudos please, if it helped.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 457
Own Kudos [?]: 724 [0]
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Hello Experts,

Can anyone explain the difference between C and E?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 289
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Can anyone explain options c and e
Also, in option c, what does the number of dependents in the future refer to?
I am having a hard time to comprehend option c
(C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 823 [1]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
1
Kudos
sunny91 wrote:
Can anyone explain options c and e
Also, in option c, what does the number of dependents in the future refer to?
I am having a hard time to comprehend option c
(C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future


E suggests to take loans to meet the shortage of funds. But the premise is already stating -" Sooner or later, the fund will not be able to meet its obligations", which would mean while taking loans might help in addressing the short term problem, later the same problem is going to arise.

C- Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future
Explanation - The issue with current system is because of not being able to maintain a fixed ratio between the workers and recipients.
"Decades ago, there were many more workers for every recipient.." - Example 3 workers for 1 client (many to one relationship)- 3:1
"....but now the situation has reversed." - Now the ratio is reversed - 1 worker for many client- 1:3 (one to many relationship)
So if the number of workers exceed the number of clients in future the situation can again get stable, like it was a decade ago.This would suggest that we wont have to proceed with the privatization of Social Security in the US.
But if the answer is No to 'C', then we will have to go with the privatization.
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
boiled down to A and C.
E is an important pattern b/c E suggests another solution. Also, such pattern often is out of scopes in many question b/c the pattern discusses sth else that is not directly linked with the argument.
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Can someone explain why A isn't the answer ?
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1089
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
1
Kudos
According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in the US, the current system is impossible to sustain. Decades ago, there were many more workers for every recipient but now the situation has reversed. Sooner or later, the fund will not be able to meet its obligations, because there will be more payments going out, than income coming in. Privatizing the system for the future recipients, while gradually phasing out the system for current and near-term recipients, is probably the best way to keep the system viable.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in determining whether privatization of Social Security in the US would be a good idea?

(A) Whether privatization has proved successful for other government provided services such as employee provident funds -Other funds are out of scope
(B) Whether the population of the US is likely to increase significantly in the future -Out of scope
(C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future -Correct. If the income earning people become more in number than the payments going out (dependants) people, then the problem can be resolved.
(D) Whether privatization of social security will lead to large scale protests by US citizens -Protests are out of scope
(E) Whether taking loans can help the Social Security system tide over the problem of the reduction in funds coming in to the system -Taking loans will eventually lead to payment of debt. Thus, this can't be a good evaluation tool.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2164 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
(C) tries to throw you off with the synonym "dependents" in place of "recipients, which is used in the stem.
Current Student
Joined: 05 May 2019
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 133
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
Send PM
According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
dcummins wrote:
(C) tries to throw you off with the synonym "dependents" in place of "recipients, which is used in the stem.



Can you explain how to eliminate option E?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
the summary of the passage is as follows:

Current social security system is impossible to sustain because as things stand, the number of dependents of the fund is increasing, whereas the #of providers to the fund is decreasing. Privatizing the fund by phasing out the old system will make Social security more viable in the future.

(A) Whether privatization has proved successful for other government provided services such as employee provident funds
- what may be true for other government services may not be applicable to the Social security system.

(B) Whether the population of the US is likely to increase significantly in the future
- (B) does not tell us whether the number of dependents/providers of (to) the funds is decreasing or increasing. Without knowing the answer to this question, we cannot arrive at the conclusion.

(C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future - if the answer to this question is no, then we can infer that there would be more providers to the fund than dependents. This would improve the situation of the fund. But if the answer is yes, then it would imply that privatization of the current social security system would lead to a shortage of funds since there will now be more dependents than fund providers. Hence, (C) will hep us determine whether the privatization of Social Security in the US would be a good idea. therefore, (C) is the right answer choice.

(D) Whether privatization of social security will lead to large scale protests by US citizens
- irrelevant to the passage

(E) Whether taking loans can help the Social Security system tide over the problem of the reduction in funds coming in to the system
- the passage is concerned with whether the privatization of Social Security in the US would be a good idea. In this context, ''loans'' is irrelevant.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619226 [0]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Expert Reply
carcass wrote:
According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in the US, the current system is impossible to sustain. Decades ago, there were many more workers for every recipient but now the situation has reversed. Sooner or later, the fund will not be able to meet its obligations, because there will be more payments going out, than income coming in. Privatizing the system for the future recipients, while gradually phasing out the system for current and near-term recipients, is probably the best way to keep the system viable.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in determining whether privatization of Social Security in the US would be a good idea?


(A) Whether privatization has proved successful for other government provided services such as employee provident funds

(B) Whether the population of the US is likely to increase significantly in the future

(C) Whether the growth in the number of workers is the US is likely to outstrip the growth in the number of dependents in the future

(D) Whether privatization of social security will lead to large scale protests by US citizens

(E) Whether taking loans can help the Social Security system tide over the problem of the reduction in funds coming in to the system


This question is a part of QOTD Question Collection



Official Explanation



Answer: C

The argument assumes that in the US the number of dependents in the future will be far more than the number of earning workers, a situation that will lead to the social security funds drying up. However, if this assumption is not true, then the Social Security system could continue working as it has been over the years. C points out this fact and is the correct answer.

(A) Whether privatization has proved successful for other services has no bearing on whether privatization will work for the Social Security system.

(B) The problem is not the population growth rate but the ratio between earners and dependents. As long as this ratio remains favourable, an increase in population should not make any difference.

(C) The correct answer.

(D) This is not the basis of the argument’s conclusion.

(E) Taking loans can provide a short-term solution but the problem will remain in the long term.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: According to those in favour of privatisation of Social Security in th [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne