It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 01:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 234

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2012, 07:02
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:50) correct 47% (01:57) wrong based on 667 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations, other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.

B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.

D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by nelz007 on 14 Nov 2012, 08:41, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 635

Kudos [?]: 664 [1], given: 23

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2012, 07:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
nelz007 wrote:
Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations, other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.

B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.

D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.


Again a question without OA.. :x

In my opinion ans should be C. "the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations" is a fact (it is mentioned that it has been confirmed) and based on this fact a perception is formed (conclusion). However second statement provides a reason to question the formation of this perception.

Ans C it is.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!! ;-)
Black Friday Debrief

Kudos [?]: 664 [1], given: 23

5 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [5], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2012, 07:37
5
This post received
KUDOS
I feel that the asnwer is C.
Though did it by POE, it took more than 2 mins.
The main conclusion is: THIS MAY NOT BE SOUND REASONING.
A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument. SECOND BOLDFACE IS NOT A CONCLUSION
B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion DISASTER. NONE OF THE PART IS CORRECT. THE FIRST DOESNT PROVIDES ANY EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE MAIN CONCLUSION AND SECOND BOLDFACE DOESNT STATES THE CONCLUSION.
C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. CORRECT
D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. THE FIRST DOES'NT DESCRIBES ANY CIRCUMSTANCE THAT THE WHOLE ARGUMENT SEEKS TO EXPLAIN. INCORRECT
E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. THE FIRST DOES'NT DESCRIBES ANY CIRCUMSTANCE THAT THE WHOLE ARGUMENT SEEKS TO EXPLAIN. INCORRECT

IMHO C.
whats the OA and the source Nelz?
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Kudos [?]: 1703 [5], given: 62

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 234

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2012, 07:44
Thanks for the explanations OA is C source is veritas

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 234

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2012, 08:38
could you guys try this question @marcab and @vips0000

in-the-past-50-years-the-population-of-honeybees-in-the-142416.html

will provide OA after explanations. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 413 [0], given: 63

VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 70

Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2012, 02:02
Pls explain how can be first bold face is supporting conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 70

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most pro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2012, 02:08
Archit143 wrote:
Pls explain how can be first bold face is supporting conclusion.


Hey archit...how are u doing?

Look at the intermediate conclusion.

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations, other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease.
[/color]
Now look at the first boldface. It is supporting the IC but not the main conclusion.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 01:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2015, 09:15
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2014
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 43

Concentration: Operations, Marketing
Schools: ISB '17 (D)
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2015, 13:22
Veritas PREP or egmat or any Expert.
Can you please explain this question. I am not able to understand it.
_________________

Beat verbal, Beat GMAT...;)
Trying Hard to do that.....

Kudos if my post helped you

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 43

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2015
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 31 [2], given: 456

Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: General Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User
Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2015, 05:25
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sahil7389 wrote:
Veritas PREP or egmat or any Expert.
Can you please explain this question. I am not able to understand it.


Hi sahil7389

Please find below my reasoning. Let me know if it helps.

Splitting the argument.

1. Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations,- Fact
2. other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. - Premise
3. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. Conclusion
4. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease. - Counter Premise

The (1) BF and (2) BF are opposite premises.

A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument. The second is not the conclusion. It is a counter premise "This may not be sound reasoning because...." Hence incorrect. (note the words - may not be)

B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion. The two BFs are supporting opposite conclusions. Hence incorrect.

C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. Yes, Both are premises, the first one supporting the conclusion and the second one, doing the opposite, makes you question the conclusion. - Correct

D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. Both are supporting opposite conclusions and are not on the same side of the argument. Also, the second BF is not an explanation, it gives you a reason to question the conclusion. Hence incorrect.

E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. Both are supporting opposite conclusions and are not on the same side of the argument. The second provides a counter -evidence to the conclusion. Hence incorrect.

Let me know if this helped you or confused you more :)

Kudos [?]: 31 [2], given: 456

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2672

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 200

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2016, 07:40
nelz007 wrote:
Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations, other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.

B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.

D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.


second is definitely not a conclusion
A and B are right away eliminated.
First one describes a fact that has lead people to consider smth. The second one, is an example why that consideration might be false.
C is the best!

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 200

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 162

Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.68
Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 06:18
nelz007 wrote:
Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most prominent multi-property owners in the condominium complex have been using home equity credit to make renovations, other owners, who feared that the complex's property values were rapidly decreasing, have been greatly relieved. They posit that, since the largest stakeholders in the complex evidently believe in the soundness of their properties, the worry that values are declining must be false. This may not be sound reasoning, however, because the largest stakeholders may simply be protecting their investments by creating the image that the property values will stay high so that other owners do not sell their properties and further perpetuate the decrease.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.

B The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

C The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.

D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

E The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.



In this question apparently C is the best option.

But for studying, What is exactly wrong in E ?


E - The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.[/quote]

1. circumstance
2. argument as a whole seeks to explain
3. provides evidence of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish


From where problems begin?
Of course, I`ve already read all the post.

broall

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 162

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most   [#permalink] 09 Nov 2017, 06:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently, since rumors have been confirmed that the most

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.