premise : researchers found almost 70% of restaurant lemon wedge has have harmful microorganism
Conclusion: don't drink it
A. The researchers could not determine why or how the microbial contamination occurred on the lemon wedges.
doesn't help in weakening the argument.why or how contamination happened is not the subject here.incorrect
B. The researchers failed to investigate contamination of restaurant lime wedges by harmful microorganisms.
same as A. incorrect
C. The researchers found that people who ordered the lemon wedges at restaurants were equally likely to contact the diseases caused by the discovered bacteria as were people who did not order lemon wedges.
if this is true,then there must be more to the story than just killer lemon wedges
hold on
D. Health laws require lemons to be handled with gloves or tongs, but the common practice for waiters and waitresses is to handle them with their bare hands.
this gives all the more reasons strengthening the argument.inocrrect
E. Many factors affect the chance of an individual contracting a disease by coming into contact with bacteria that have nothing to do with lemons. These factors include things such as health and age of the individual, as well as the status of their immune system.
Out of scope.
IMO C