Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 09:43 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 09:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,874
Own Kudos:
3,573
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,874
Kudos: 3,573
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TAC470
Joined: 18 Jun 2019
Last visit: 01 Mar 2022
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V21
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V21
Posts: 56
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,874
Own Kudos:
3,573
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,874
Kudos: 3,573
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Jatin108
Joined: 09 Apr 2015
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q46 V38
GMAT 1: 690 Q46 V38
Posts: 26
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ok for people who don't know what are absolute phrases here are my 2cents on how to solve this one :

A: appear was is a red flag, it still is perhaps, also evidence of is unidiomatic
B: Appears it had been and stunning evidence that : this is problematic because the "And" here just disturbs the meaning altogether
C: "Appear was" : same error as A
D: hold , can't find a mistake
E : Evidence of unidiomatic

D It is : and stunning evidence modifies the clause before the comma so yeah
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 05 Jul 2025
Posts: 197
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 197
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Appears verb is referring to which subject? Is from what resulting in inverted sentence structure?
Please help

@VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
User avatar
mansianand1234
Joined: 24 Jul 2017
Last visit: 02 Dec 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 22
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
how do I identify here that 'stunning' is not ing verbal but part of absolute phrase

I thought ing verbal is incorrectly used here.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,486
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,486
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mansianand1234
how do I identify here that 'stunning' is not ing verbal but part of absolute phrase

I thought ing verbal is incorrectly used here.
The only way to tell what the function of "stunning" is in this context is to consider the meaning conveyed.

We can see that it doesn't make sense to say that, when researchers unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears, the researchers were "stunning evidence." Thus, as you indicated, logic dictates that "stunning evidence ..." cannot be a participial phrase that modifies the preceding clause.

However, we don't stop there. Rather, we have to consider whether a different meaning makes sense.

Doing so, we see that "stunning evidence" can be an appositive that renames "400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground." The spears and hunting ground represent "stunning evidence that human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed."

In that case, "stunning" is a participle that modifies "evidence."

Since the sentence is properly constructed and the meaning conveyed makes sense, the (D) version is correct.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,513
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nikitathegreat
Appears verb is referring to which subject? Is from what resulting in inverted sentence structure?
Please help

@veritaskarishma GMATNinja
This is construction certainly isn't wrong, but it's funky and pretty unusual. "What" is basically functioning as a stand-in (a pronoun) for "the thing that":

    "Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from the thing that appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground..."

And how do we know whether it should be "appear" or "appears"? Well, it depends on what comes after "to be":

  • "Researchers have found what appears to be an ancient hunting ground." - Since "an ancient hunting ground" is singular, we need a singular form of the verb ("appears"). Notice also that you can replace "what" with "the thing that" ("the thing that appears to be...").
  • "Researchers have found what appear to be ancient fishing hooks." - Since "ancient fishing hooks" is plural, we now need a plural verb (appear). Now the "what" means "the things that".

But again, this isn't something you're likely to see very often, so don't lose too much sleep over it.

I hope that helps!
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts