Bunuel
Competition Mode Question
Restaurant manager: In response to requests from our patrons for vegetarian main dishes, we recently introduced three: an eggplant and zucchini casserole with tomatoes, brown rice with mushrooms, and potatoes baked with cheese. The first two are frequently ordered, but no one orders the potato dish, although it costs less than the other two. Clearly, then, our patrons prefer not to eat potatoes.
Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in the restaurant manager’s argument?
(A) concluding that two things that occur at the same time have a common cause
(B) drawing a conclusion that is inconsistent with one premise of the argument
(C) ignoring possible differences between what people say they want and what they actually choose
(D) attempting to prove a claim on the basis of evidence that a number of people hold that claim to be true
(E) treating one of several plausible explanations of a phenomenon as the only possible explanation
Of the three, people choose first 2, not the third.
There could be many reasons for this.
They may not like potatoes.
They may like potatoes but could prefer eggplant/rice over potatoes.
They my not like cheese.
They may like cheese but prefer mushrooms/tomatoes over cheese.
etc
The manager is assuming that the reason is that people do not like potatoes. But that is only one of the possible explanations. Hence (E) is correct.
(C) ignoring possible differences between what people say they want and what they actually choose
This is irrelevant. If "what people say they want" and "what they choose" are different things, we have no data on "what people say they want". We only know what they actually choose (first two dishes). The manager doesn't know what "people say they want". So he cannot ignore that difference.
Only based on the data available to him about what people choose, he claims that people do not like potatoes.
Hence (C) is not correct.