artieraj
goldsjo
did you find the arco stuff helpful or was it way off? did you use the "master the gmat cat 2004 " arco book with a picture of an empty classroom on the front? i took the test 3 weeks ago and i am retaking again. my concern is that i have already done the kaplan AND princeton CD roms with the cat's and i can't use them to study (because i am familiar with the questions and answers). i also have done most of the green "
OFFICIAL GUIDE (10TH EDITION)" what other materials are out there for me to utilize?
Hi Goldsjo,
I found ARCO very good ... I actually have a soft corner for it it, since I used ARCO to write GRE on 1.5 days notice (& did quite well in quant & verbal). I am not quite a believer in PR & Kaplan's "strategizing" .. I believe they over-analyze simple things & make them complex (there is a term for it: ANALYSIS PARALYSIS). OTOH, arco focuses on getting the basics right (tons of exercises), which worked great with me. Especially RC, SC & quant problems were quite good. CR was ok (hard to get that wrong) but DS was too easy. Since I was mostly preparing on breaks that I got at work (& while travelling), I worked almost exclusively off the CD software. BTW, the A R CO book that I have is not green, it is yellow.
I believe that the content is the same as in the book. I would suggest that you not be worried about already having seen the Kaplan & PR questions: I believe that BB recommends repetition, as have some of my friends who have also done well in the GMAT. The drawback of that is, that you will not have a good idea of your score going in, but on the plus side, you will have prepared very well indeed.
Hope this helps,
Raj
Hi everyone!
First of all, Congratulations Artieraj on a terrific score. That's kick up your application a few notches at ANY school in the world.
Having said that , I just want to insert a little caveat here when reading the preparation stories of people who score VERY high on the GMAT.
Simply put, some of them do VERY well simply because they are VERY VERY VERY friggin smart. Which means that their study habits will not exactly yield similar results for people who are just regular SMART, or even VERY smart.
The very first time I took the GMAT (in 1990), I didn't study at all because I was not really serious about it and I had studied a little for the LSAT. While the LSAT studying certainly helped CR and RC, I winged Quant and SC blind. I got 740. Most people would be happy with that, but I would never advise anyone to study that way. It's just that my background and education at the time allowed me to do it that way.
Since then, I have scored much higher (really) but I still would not advise my students to study the same way i do.
I have been teaching the GMAT privately for about a year, and I have found that the best approach is to taylor a program of study based on a student's background, education, enthusiasm, and creativity. No two students are alike and to cookie cutter a program based on someone else's success would not be productive.
As a student, you need to take inventory of YOUR own personal strengths and weaknesses, and taylor a sensible plan to overcome those weaknesses while simultaneously enhancing your strengths. What is useful to a person with a 160 IQ might not be so useful to you, and what was a waste of time for that person may be your most valuable resourse. Simply parroting the experience of successful test takers with not typically yield some magic formula for study that will help you succeed.
Just my humble opinion.